Jonathan W Serpell1, Peter W G Carne, Michael Bailey. 1. The Alfred and Frankston Hospitals, the Victorian Melanoma Service, The Alfred Hospital, the Department of Surgery, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. jwserpell@ozemail.com.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic lymph node dissection for melanoma aims to achieve regional disease control. Radical lymphadenectomy (RLND) can be a difficult procedure associated with significant postoperative morbidity. The aims of the present study were to review regional disease control and morbidity in a series of lymphadenectomies performed within a specialist unit. METHODS: The present study involved the analysis of 73 lymphadenectomies in 64 patients, from 1995 to 2001. RESULTS: The overall wound complication rate after inguinal lymphadenectomy (71%) was higher than after axillary lymphadenectomy (47%; P = 0.05). After inguinal lymphadenectomy, the wound infection rate was higher (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), delayed wound healing was more frequent (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), and the mean time that drain tubes remained in situ was longer (12.5 vs 8.2 days; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in seroma (46%vs 32%) rates. Lymphoedema was more common after inguinal lymphadenectomy (P < 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified inguinal RLND (P = 0.002) and increasing tumour size (P = 0.045) as predictors of wound morbidity. More patients received postoperative radiotherapy after neck RLND compared to inguinal or axilla RLND (P = 0.03). Six (8%) patients developed local recurrence after lymphadenectomy. At a median follow up of 22 months, 34 (53%) patients have died, from disseminated disease. CONCLUSIONS: Radical lymphadenectomy for melanoma is associated with significant morbidity. Inguinal node dissection has a higher rate of complications than axillary dissection. Low local recurrence rates can be achieved, limiting the potential morbidity of uncontrolled regional metastatic disease.
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic lymph node dissection for melanoma aims to achieve regional disease control. Radical lymphadenectomy (RLND) can be a difficult procedure associated with significant postoperative morbidity. The aims of the present study were to review regional disease control and morbidity in a series of lymphadenectomies performed within a specialist unit. METHODS: The present study involved the analysis of 73 lymphadenectomies in 64 patients, from 1995 to 2001. RESULTS: The overall wound complication rate after inguinal lymphadenectomy (71%) was higher than after axillary lymphadenectomy (47%; P = 0.05). After inguinal lymphadenectomy, the wound infection rate was higher (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), delayed wound healing was more frequent (25.0%vs 5.9%; P = 0.03), and the mean time that drain tubes remained in situ was longer (12.5 vs 8.2 days; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in seroma (46%vs 32%) rates. Lymphoedema was more common after inguinal lymphadenectomy (P < 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified inguinal RLND (P = 0.002) and increasing tumour size (P = 0.045) as predictors of wound morbidity. More patients received postoperative radiotherapy after neck RLND compared to inguinal or axilla RLND (P = 0.03). Six (8%) patients developed local recurrence after lymphadenectomy. At a median follow up of 22 months, 34 (53%) patients have died, from disseminated disease. CONCLUSIONS: Radical lymphadenectomy for melanoma is associated with significant morbidity. Inguinal node dissection has a higher rate of complications than axillary dissection. Low local recurrence rates can be achieved, limiting the potential morbidity of uncontrolled regional metastatic disease.
Authors: F Egberts; C Hartje; C Schafmayer; K C Kaehler; W von Schönfels; A Hauschild; T Becker; J H Egberts Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Sharon B Chang; Robert L Askew; Yan Xing; Storm Weaver; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Richard Royal; Anthony Lucci; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Rachel K Voss; Kate D Cromwell; Yi-Ju Chiang; Jane M Armer; Merrick I Ross; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Bob R Stewart; Simona F Shaitelman; Janice N Cormier Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2015-10-18 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: James W Jakub; Alicia M Terando; Amod Sarnaik; Charlotte E Ariyan; Mark B Faries; Sabino Zani; Heather B Neuman; Nabil Wasif; Jeffrey M Farma; Bruce J Averbook; Karl Y Bilimoria; Travis E Grotz; Jacob B Jake Allred; Vera J Suman; Mary Sue Brady; Douglas Tyler; Jeffrey D Wayne; Heidi Nelson Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Carly E Glarner; David Y Greenblatt; Robert J Rettammel; Heather B Neuman; Sharon M Weber Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 5.344