Literature DB >> 2033449

Isoflurane-induced attenuation of motor evoked potentials caused by electrical motor cortex stimulation during surgery.

B Calancie1, K J Klose, S Baier, B A Green.   

Abstract

Dysfunction of spinal motor conduction during surgical procedures may not be reflected by changes in somatosensory evoked potential waveforms. A method of monitoring that allows direct and continuous assessment of motor function within the central nervous system during surgery would be useful. This paper describes one such method utilizing noninvasive electric cortical stimulation to evoke muscle activity (the motor evoked potential, or MEP) during surgery. The effect of isoflurane (superimposed on a baseline of N2O/narcotic anesthesia) on MEP's in response to cortical stimulation is specifically examined. Eight patients undergoing elective neurosurgical operations were included in the study. All patients received a background of general anesthesia and partial nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. The motor cortex was stimulated electrically via self-adhesive scalp electrodes. Electromyographic responses from multiple muscles were measured with subdermal electroencephalograph-type needle electrodes. Motor responses to stimulation were continually recorded on magnetic tape for off-line analysis. Once closing of the surgical incision was begun, a series of four to five stimuli of constant magnitude were applied to obtain "baseline" MEP responses. Patients were then ventilated with isoflurane for up to 8 minutes, during which time stimuli were continued every 15 to 20 seconds. Comparison was made of MEP responses for trials before, 1 minute after, and 5 minutes after the addition of isoflurane. All patients demonstrated reproducible motor responses to cortical stimulation during surgery. Addition of isoflurane [isoflurane)exp, less than or equal to 0.5%) to pre-existing anesthesia caused marked attenuation of MEP amplitudes in all patients within 5 minutes of its application, without affecting neuromuscular transmission as judged by direct peripheral nerve stimulation. It is concluded that: 1) monitoring motor system integrity and function with electric transcranial cortical stimulation during surgery is feasible when utilizing an N2O/narcotic anesthetic protocol; and 2) the quality of data obtained will likely suffer with the addition of isoflurane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2033449     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1991.74.6.0897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  17 in total

1.  Activation of the external anal and urethral sphincter muscles by repetitive transcranial cortical stimulation during spine surgery.

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi; Richard Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Methodology of motor evoked potentials in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Stephen D Waterford; Michelle Rastegar; Erin Goodwin; Paul A Lapchak; Viviana Juan; Farnaz Haji; René Bombien; Ali Khoynezhad
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  Intraoperative transcranial electrical motor evoked potential monitoring during spinal surgery under intravenous ketamine or etomidate anaesthesia.

Authors:  L H Yang; S M Lin; W Y Lee; C C Liu
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Quantification of the proportion of motor neurons recruited by transcranial electrical stimulation during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Shunji Tsutsui; Hiroshi Yamada; Hiroshi Hashizume; Akihito Minamide; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Munehito Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Intraoperative electrical stimulation mapping as an aid for surgery of intracranial lesions involving motor areas in children.

Authors:  Francesco Signorelli; J Guyotat; C Mottolese; F Schneider; G D'Acunzi; J Isnard
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Monitoring of motor evoked potentials with high intensity repetitive transcranial electrical stimulation during spinal surgery.

Authors:  Siavash S Haghighi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 9.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  PET∕CT imaging evidence of FUS-mediated (18)F-FDG uptake changes in rat brain.

Authors:  Hyungmin Kim; Mi-Ae Park; Shuyan Wang; Alan Chiu; Krisztina Fischer; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.