Literature DB >> 20329849

Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.

Heleen Luts1, Koen Eneman, Jan Wouters, Michael Schulte, Matthias Vormann, Michael Buechler, Norbert Dillier, Rolph Houben, Wouter A Dreschler, Matthias Froehlich, Henning Puder, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, Arne Leijon, Anthony Lombard, Dirk Mauler, Ann Spriet.   

Abstract

In the framework of the European HearCom project, promising signal enhancement algorithms were developed and evaluated for future use in hearing instruments. To assess the algorithms' performance, five of the algorithms were selected and implemented on a common real-time hardware/software platform. Four test centers in Belgium, The Netherlands, Germany, and Switzerland perceptually evaluated the algorithms. Listening tests were performed with large numbers of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Three perceptual measures were used: speech reception threshold (SRT), listening effort scaling, and preference rating. Tests were carried out in two types of rooms. Speech was presented in multitalker babble arriving from one or three loudspeakers. In a pseudo-diffuse noise scenario, only one algorithm, the spatially preprocessed speech-distortion-weighted multi-channel Wiener filtering, provided a SRT improvement relative to the unprocessed condition. Despite the general lack of improvement in SRT, some algorithms were preferred over the unprocessed condition at all tested signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). These effects were found across different subject groups and test sites. The listening effort scores were less consistent over test sites. For the algorithms that did not affect speech intelligibility, a reduction in listening effort was observed at 0 dB SNR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20329849     DOI: 10.1121/1.3299168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  A method to remove differences in frequency response between commercial hearing aids to allow direct comparison of the sound quality of hearing-aid features.

Authors:  Rolph Houben; Inge Brons; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-11-07

2.  Gain-induced speech distortions and the absence of intelligibility benefit with existing noise-reduction algorithms.

Authors:  Gibak Kim; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Benefit of binaural listening as revealed by speech intelligibility and listening effort.

Authors:  Jan Rennies; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load During Conventional Speech Audiometry With Matrix Sentences.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Sebastian Rählmann; Ulrike Lemke; Jana Besser
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.

Authors:  Jitong Chen; Yuxuan Wang; Sarah E Yoho; DeLiang Wang; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Katrina Freeston; Jörg M Buchholz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Heather Cones
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.

Authors:  Samantha Gustafson; Ryan McCreery; Brenda Hoover; Judy G Kopun; Pat Stelmachowicz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental Effort.

Authors:  Travis M Moore; Erin M Picou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Influence of surgical and N95 face masks on speech perception and listening effort in noise.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Stefan Plontke; Luise Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.