Literature DB >> 12439250

Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty.

Mauricio Silva1, Ravi Tharani, Thomas P Schmalzried.   

Abstract

In this literature review, 30 reports provided outcome data on 37 direct exchange arthroplasties, 530 open debridements, and 23 arthroscopic debridements. The average followup was approximately 4 years, but the range was broad (range, 0.02-14 years). Infection was controlled in 33 of the 37 infected total knee arthroplasties (89.2%) treated by direct exchange arthroplasty, in only 173 of the 530 infected total knee arthroplasties (32.6%) treated by open debridement and retention of the prosthetic components, and in 12 of the 23 infected total knee arthroplasties (52.2%) treated by arthroscopic debridement. There was wide variability in associated antibiotic therapy. Factors associated with successful direct exchange included infections by gram-positive organisms, absence of sinus formation, use of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement for the new prosthesis, and 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Direct exchange arthroplasty failed in four of 37 knees; two were in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were taking corticosteroids. Factors associated with successful debridements included those done within 4 months of the index procedure, or in patients with less than 4 weeks of symptoms, antibiotic sensitive gram-positive organisms, well-fixed components with no radiologic evidence of osteitis, and in young healthy patients. Factors associated with the failed debridements included postoperative drainage for more than 2 weeks, sinus tracts present at the time of the debridement, a hinged prosthesis, and an immunocompromised host. Direct exchange can be successful with a sensitive organism in a healthy host with prolonged antibiotic therapy. Debridement can be successful in early infections in a healthy host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439250     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  69 in total

1.  Infections Associated with Prosthetic Knee and Prosthetic Hip.

Authors:  Joseph R Lentino
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 2.  Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers.

Authors:  C L Romanò; L Gala; N Logoluso; D Romanò; L Drago
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  Dann J Laudermilch; Catherine J Fedorka; Alma Heyl; Nalini Rao; Richard L McGough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Assessing the gold standard: a review of 253 two-stage revisions for infected TKA.

Authors:  Tahir Mahmud; Matthew C Lyons; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J Macdonald; Richard W McCalden
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Failure of irrigation and débridement for early postoperative periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Susan M Odum; Keith R Berend; William A Jiranek; Javad Parvizi; Kevin J Bozic; Craig J Della Valle; Terence J Gioe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Irrigation and débridement and prosthesis retention for treating acute periprosthetic infections.

Authors:  Jonathan P Van Kleunen; Denise Knox; Jonathan P Garino; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Functional outcomes of acutely infected knee arthroplasty: a comparison of different surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Ivan Dzaja; James Howard; Lyndsay Somerville; Brent Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Direct exchange endoprosthetic reconstruction with tumour prosthesis for periprosthetic knee infection associated with segmental bone defects.

Authors:  Manjunath Ramappa; Ian McMurtry; Andrew Port
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-01-12

9.  Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology.

Authors:  P Bejon; A Berendt; B L Atkins; N Green; H Parry; S Masters; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; I Byren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 10.  Outcome of prosthesis exchange for infected knee arthroplasty: the effect of treatment approach.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Ioannis Stogiannidis; Antti Malmivaara; Jorma Pajamäki; Timo Puolakka; Yrjö T Konttinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.