Literature DB >> 20308671

Capecitabine in addition to anthracycline- and taxane-based neoadjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer: phase III GeparQuattro study.

Gunter von Minckwitz1, Mahdi Rezai, Sibylle Loibl, Peter A Fasching, Jens Huober, Hans Tesch, Ingo Bauerfeind, Jörn Hilfrich, Holger Eidtmann, Bernd Gerber, Claus Hanusch, Thorsten Kühn, Andreas du Bois, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Christoph Thomssen, Serban Dan Costa, Christian Jackisch, Manfred Kaufmann, Keyur Mehta, Michael Untch.   

Abstract

PURPOSE Capecitabine can be integrated either concomitantly or sequentially to anthracycline-plus-taxane-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with large operable or locally advanced tumors, with hormone receptor-negative tumors, or with receptor-positive tumors but also clinically node-positive disease were recruited to receive preoperatively four cycles of epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (EC; epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)). Patients were then randomly assigned to four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m(2)), four cycles of docetaxel + capecitabine (TX; docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus capecitabine 1,800 mg/m(2)), or four cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) followed by four cycles of capecitabine (1,800 mg/m(2); T-X). Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) -positive tumors received trastuzumab concomitantly with all cycles. Primary objectives were to assess the effect of docetaxel by comparing EC plus docetaxel versus EC plus TX and to assess the effect of duration by comparing EC plus TX versus EC plus T-X on pathologic complete response (pCR, without invasive/noninvasive breast tumor, regardless of nodal status) at surgery, irrespective of trastuzumab treatment. Results Of 1,509 patients starting EC, 1,421 were randomly assigned to docetaxel (n = 471), TX (n = 471), or T-X (n = 479). At surgery, pCR rates were 22.3%, 19.5%, and 22.3%, respectively; the difference for docetaxel (EC plus docetaxel v EC plus TX) was 2.8% (95% CI, -2.4% to 8.0%; P = .298).The difference for duration was -2.8% (95% CI, -8.0% to 2.4%; P = .298). Breast conservation rates were 70.1%, 68.4%, and 65.3%, respectively (P = .781 for docetaxel; P = .270 for duration). Concomitant but not sequential treatment with docetaxel was associated with more diarrhea; nail changes, and hand-foot-syndrome, but it was associated with less edema. CONCLUSION Adding capecitabine to or prolonging duration of neoadjuvant EC plus docetaxel does not result in higher efficacy at surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308671     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  58 in total

1.  Re-Challenging Taxanes in Recurrent Breast Cancer in Patients Treated with (Neo-)Adjuvant Taxane-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Xinrong Guo; Sibylle Loibl; Michael Untch; Volker Möbus; Kathrin Schwedler; Peter A Fasching; Jana Barinoff; Frank Holms; Christoph Thomssen; Dirk M Zahm; Rolf Kreienberg; Maik Hauschild; Holger Eidtmann; Sascha Tauchert; Keyur Mehta; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Effect of Body Mass Index- and Actual Weight-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Doses on Pathologic Complete Response in Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rachna Raman; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Sneha Phadke; Jad El Masri; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Landscape of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tufia C Haddad; Matthew P Goetz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  ER, PgR, HER-2, Ki-67, topoisomerase IIα, and nm23-H1 proteins expression as predictors of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Xi-ru Li; Mei Liu; Yan-jun Zhang; Jian-dong Wang; Yi-qiong Zheng; Jie Li; Bing Ma; Xin Song
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Cellular redox pathways as a therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Alberto J Montero; Jacek Jassem
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.

Authors:  Shetal A Patel; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond.

Authors:  C E Simmons; S Hogeveen; R Leonard; Y Rajmohan; D Han; A Wong; J Lee; M Brackstone; J F Boileau; R Dinniwell; S Gandhi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Time interval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer: how long is acceptable?

Authors:  Tae-Kyung Yoo; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

9.  Incidence and risk of central nervous system metastases as site of first recurrence in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.

Authors:  E M Olson; M Abdel-Rasoul; J Maly; C S Wu; N U Lin; C L Shapiro
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC-75) followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab versus paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC-75 plus trastuzumab as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (Z1041): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Aman U Buzdar; Vera J Suman; Funda Meric-Bernstam; A Marilyn Leitch; Matthew J Ellis; Judy C Boughey; Gary Unzeitig; Melanie Royce; Linda M McCall; Michael S Ewer; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.