BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest differences in stroke care associated with race/ethnicity. We sought to determine whether such differences existed in a population of black, Hispanic, and white patients hospitalized with stroke among hospitals participating in a quality-improvement program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed in-hospital mortality and 7 stroke performance measures among 397,257 patients admitted with ischemic stroke to 1181 hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program 2003 through 2008. Relative to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger and more often had diabetes mellitus and hypertension. After adjustment for both patient- and hospital-level variables, black patients had lower odds relative to white patients of receiving intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.91), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.92), smoking cessation (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91), discharge antithrombotics (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.92), anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.94), and lipid therapy (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.96), and of dying in-hospital (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.95). Hispanic patients received similar care as their white counterparts on all 7 measures and had similar in-hospital mortality. Black (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.35) and Hispanic (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.20) patients had higher odds of exceeding the median length of hospital stay relative to whites. During the study, quality of care improved in all 3 race/ethnicity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with stroke received fewer evidence-based care processes than Hispanic or white patients. These differences could lead to increased risk of recurrent stroke. Quality of care improved substantially in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program over time for all 3 racial/ethnic groups.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies suggest differences in stroke care associated with race/ethnicity. We sought to determine whether such differences existed in a population of black, Hispanic, and white patients hospitalized with stroke among hospitals participating in a quality-improvement program. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed in-hospital mortality and 7 stroke performance measures among 397,257 patients admitted with ischemic stroke to 1181 hospitals participating in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke program 2003 through 2008. Relative to white patients, black and Hispanic patients were younger and more often had diabetes mellitus and hypertension. After adjustment for both patient- and hospital-level variables, black patients had lower odds relative to white patients of receiving intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 0.91), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.92), smoking cessation (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.91), discharge antithrombotics (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.92), anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.94), and lipid therapy (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.96), and of dying in-hospital (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.95). Hispanic patients received similar care as their white counterparts on all 7 measures and had similar in-hospital mortality. Black (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.35) and Hispanic (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.20) patients had higher odds of exceeding the median length of hospital stay relative to whites. During the study, quality of care improved in all 3 race/ethnicity groups. CONCLUSIONS: Black patients with stroke received fewer evidence-based care processes than Hispanic or white patients. These differences could lead to increased risk of recurrent stroke. Quality of care improved substantially in the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Program over time for all 3 racial/ethnic groups.
Authors: Sana M Al-Khatib; Anne S Hellkamp; Adrian F Hernandez; Gregg C Fonarow; Kevin L Thomas; Hussein R Al-Khalidi; Paul A Heidenreich; Stephen Hammill; Clyde Yancy; Eric D Peterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Amie W Hsia; Dorothy F Edwards; Lewis B Morgenstern; Jeffrey J Wing; Nina C Brown; Regina Coles; Sarah Loftin; Andrea Wein; Sara S Koslosky; Sabiha Fatima; Brisa N Sánchez; Ali Fokar; M Chris Gibbons; Nawar Shara; Annapurni Jayam-Trouth; Chelsea S Kidwell Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-06-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Darin B Zahuranec; Lynda D Lisabeth; Jonggyu Baek; Eric E Adelman; Nelda M Garcia; Erin C Case; Morgan S Campbell; Lewis B Morgenstern Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2017
Authors: Sofia A Oluwole; Kefeng Wang; Chuanhui Dong; Maria A Ciliberti-Vargas; Carolina M Gutierrez; Li Yi; Jose G Romano; Enmanuel Perez; Brittany Ann Tyson; Maranatha Ayodele; Negar Asdaghi; Hannah Gardener; David Z Rose; Enid J Garcia; Juan Carlos Zevallos; Dianne Foster; Mary Robichaux; Salina P Waddy; Ralph L Sacco; Tatjana Rundek Journal: Stroke Date: 2017-07-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Michael J Lyerly; Karen C Albright; Amelia K Boehme; Reza Bavarsad Shahripour; John P Donnelly; James T Houston; Pawan V Rawal; Niren Kapoor; Muhammad Alvi; April Sisson; Anne W Alexandrov; Andrei V Alexandrov Journal: South Med J Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: P M Chen; D T Nguyen; J P Ho; M Pirastehfar; R Narula; K Rapp; K Agrawal; B Huisa; R Modir; D Meyer; T Hemmen; C Kidwell; B C Meyer Journal: Austin J Cerebrovasc Dis Stroke Date: 2018-01-11