Literature DB >> 20308592

Genomic arrangement of bacterial operons is constrained by biological pathways encoded in the genome.

Yanbin Yin1, Han Zhang, Victor Olman, Ying Xu.   

Abstract

It is generally known that bacterial genes working in the same biological pathways tend to group into operons, possibly to facilitate cotranscription and to provide stoichiometry. However, very little is understood about what may determine the global arrangement of bacterial genes in a genome beyond the operon level. Here we present evidence that the global arrangement of operons in a bacterial genome is largely influenced by the tendency that a bacterium keeps its operons encoding the same biological pathway in nearby genomic locations, and by the tendency to keep operons involved in multiple pathways in locations close to the other members of their participating pathways. We also observed that the activation frequencies of pathways also influence the genomic locations of their encoding operons, tending to have operons of the more frequently activated pathways more tightly clustered together. We have quantitatively assessed the influences on the global genomic arrangement of operons by different factors. We found that the current arrangements of operons in most of the bacterial genomes we studied tend to minimize the overall distance between consecutive operons of a same pathway across all pathways encoded in the genome.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20308592      PMCID: PMC2851940          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0911237107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Predicted highly expressed genes of diverse prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  S Karlin; J Mrázek
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias.

Authors:  B M Bolstad; R A Irizarry; M Astrand; T P Speed
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Essentiality, not expressiveness, drives gene-strand bias in bacteria.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Antoine Danchin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  From genes to genomes: universal scale-invariant properties of microbial chromosome organisation.

Authors:  Benjamin Audit; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins.

Authors:  F JACOB; J MONOD
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  [Operon: a group of genes with the expression coordinated by an operator].

Authors:  F JACOB; D PERRIN; C SANCHEZ; J MONOD
Journal:  C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci       Date:  1960-02-29

7.  Topological domain structure of the Escherichia coli chromosome.

Authors:  Lisa Postow; Christine D Hardy; Javier Arsuaga; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  The organization of the bacterial genome.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  Selfish operons: horizontal transfer may drive the evolution of gene clusters.

Authors:  J G Lawrence; J R Roth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Periodic transcriptional organization of the E.coli genome.

Authors:  François Képès
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  22 in total

1.  Transcriptome and Comparative Genomics Analyses Reveal New Functional Insights on Key Determinants of Pathogenesis and Interbacterial Competition in Pectobacterium and Dickeya spp.

Authors:  Daniel Bellieny-Rabelo; Collins K Tanui; Nikki Miguel; Stanford Kwenda; Divine Y Shyntum; Lucy N Moleleki
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Transcription of Bacterial Chromatin.

Authors:  Beth A Shen; Robert Landick
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Characterization of a planctomycetal organelle: a novel bacterial microcompartment for the aerobic degradation of plant saccharides.

Authors:  Onur Erbilgin; Kent L McDonald; Cheryl A Kerfeld
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Expression during host infection and localization of Yersinia pestis autotransporter proteins.

Authors:  Jonathan D Lenz; Matthew B Lawrenz; David G Cotter; M Chelsea Lane; Rodrigo J Gonzalez; Michelle Palacios; Virginia L Miller
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  Coevolution of the Organization and Structure of Prokaryotic Genomes.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  High-throughput screen of essential gene modules in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a bibliometric approach.

Authors:  Guangyu Xu; Bin Liu; Fang Wang; Chengguo Wei; Ying Zhang; Jiyao Sheng; Guoqing Wang; Fan Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Genomic arrangement of regulons in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Yanbin Yin; Victor Olman; Ying Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Spatial features for Escherichia coli genome organization.

Authors:  Ting Xie; Liang-Yu Fu; Qing-Yong Yang; Heng Xiong; Hongrui Xu; Bin-Guang Ma; Hong-Yu Zhang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Gene location and DNA density determine transcription factor distributions in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Thomas E Kuhlman; Edward C Cox
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.429

10.  Computational analyses of transcriptomic data reveal the dynamic organization of the Escherichia coli chromosome under different conditions.

Authors:  Qin Ma; Yanbin Yin; Mark A Schell; Han Zhang; Guojun Li; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.