Literature DB >> 20307669

A mobile threat to genome stability: The impact of non-LTR retrotransposons upon the human genome.

Miriam K Konkel1, Mark A Batzer.   

Abstract

It is now commonly agreed that the human genome is not the stable entity originally presumed. Deletions, duplications, inversions, and insertions are common, and contribute significantly to genomic structural variations (SVs). Their collective impact generates much of the inter-individual genomic diversity observed among humans. Not only do these variations change the structure of the genome; they may also have functional implications, e.g. altered gene expression. Some SVs have been identified as the cause of genetic disorders, including cancer predisposition. Cancer cells are notorious for their genomic instability, and often show genomic rearrangements at the microscopic and submicroscopic level to which transposable elements (TEs) contribute. Here, we review the role of TEs in genome instability, with particular focus on non-LTR retrotransposons. Currently, three non-LTR retrotransposon families - long interspersed element 1 (L1), SVA (short interspersed element (SINE-R), variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), and Alu), and Alu (a SINE) elements - mobilize in the human genome, and cause genomic instability through both insertion- and post-insertion-based mutagenesis. Due to the abundance and high sequence identity of TEs, they frequently mislead the homologous recombination repair pathway into non-allelic homologous recombination, causing deletions, duplications, and inversions. While less comprehensively studied, non-LTR retrotransposon insertions and TE-mediated rearrangements are probably more common in cancer cells than in healthy tissue. This may be at least partially attributed to the commonly seen global hypomethylation as well as general epigenetic dysfunction of cancer cells. Where possible, we provide examples that impact cancer predisposition and/or development.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20307669      PMCID: PMC2925057          DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol        ISSN: 1044-579X            Impact factor:   15.707


  151 in total

1.  Chromosomal instability and tumors promoted by DNA hypomethylation.

Authors:  Amir Eden; François Gaudet; Alpana Waghmare; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  SVA elements: a hominid-specific retroposon family.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Jinchuan Xing; Deepak Grover; Dale J Hedges; Kyudong Han; Jerilyn A Walker; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Human L1 retrotransposon encodes a conserved endonuclease required for retrotransposition.

Authors:  Q Feng; J V Moran; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Human L1 retrotransposition: cis preference versus trans complementation.

Authors:  W Wei; N Gilbert; S L Ooi; J F Lawler; E M Ostertag; H H Kazazian; J D Boeke; J V Moran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Human L1 element target-primed reverse transcription in vitro.

Authors:  Gregory J Cost; Qinghua Feng; Alain Jacquier; Jef D Boeke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Chromosomal translocation mechanisms at intronic alu elements in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Beth Elliott; Christine Richardson; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-03-18       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  A large germline deletion in the Chek2 kinase gene is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Cybulski; D Wokołorczyk; T Huzarski; T Byrski; J Gronwald; B Górski; T Debniak; B Masojć; A Jakubowska; B Gliniewicz; A Sikorski; M Stawicka; D Godlewski; Z Kwias; A Antczak; K Krajka; W Lauer; M Sosnowski; P Sikorska-Radek; K Bar; R Klijer; R Zdrojowy; B Małkiewicz; A Borkowski; T Borkowski; M Szwiec; S A Narod; J Lubiński
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  MSH2 in contrast to MLH1 and MSH6 is frequently inactivated by exonic and promoter rearrangements in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Françoise Charbonnier; Sylviane Olschwang; Qing Wang; Cécile Boisson; Cosette Martin; Marie-Pierre Buisine; Alain Puisieux; Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Unit-length line-1 transcripts in human teratocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  J Skowronski; T G Fanning; M F Singer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Endonuclease-independent insertion provides an alternative pathway for L1 retrotransposition in the human genome.

Authors:  Shurjo K Sen; Charles T Huang; Kyudong Han; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  79 in total

1.  Independently derived targeting of 28S rDNA by A- and D-clade R2 retrotransposons: Plasticity of integration mechanism.

Authors:  Blaine K Thompson; Shawn M Christensen
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-05

2.  Comprehensive analysis of microRNA genomic loci identifies pervasive repetitive-element origins.

Authors:  Glen M Borchert; Nathaniel W Holton; Jonathan D Williams; William L Hernan; Ian P Bishop; Joel A Dembosky; James E Elste; Nathaniel S Gregoire; Jee-Ah Kim; Wesley W Koehler; Joe C Lengerich; Arianna A Medema; Marilyn A Nguyen; Geoffrey D Ower; Michelle A Rarick; Brooke N Strong; Nicholas J Tardi; Nathan M Tasker; Darren J Wozniak; Craig Gatto; Erik D Larson
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-05

Review 3.  Male germline control of transposable elements.

Authors:  Jianqiang Bao; Wei Yan
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.285

4.  Transposable element insertions have strongly affected human evolution.

Authors:  Roy J Britten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Noise-driven heterogeneity in the rate of genetic-variant generation as a basis for evolvability.

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Capp
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: the role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.878

7.  SMYD5 Controls Heterochromatin and Chromosome Integrity during Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Kidder; Runsheng He; Darawalee Wangsa; Hesed M Padilla-Nash; M Margarida Bernardo; Shijie Sheng; Thomas Ried; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Somatizing the transposons action.

Authors:  Elgion L S Loreto; Camila Moura Pereira
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2017-04-13

9.  Characterization of a novel germline PALB2 duplication in a hereditary breast and ovarian cancer family.

Authors:  Ciyu Yang; Angela G Arnold; Magan Trottier; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Oliver Zivanovic; Mark E Robson; Zsofia K Stadler; Michael F Walsh; David M Hyman; Kenneth Offit; Liying Zhang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Mobilizing diversity: transposable element insertions in genetic variation and disease.

Authors:  Kathryn A O'Donnell; Kathleen H Burns
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-09-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.