Literature DB >> 20306533

Sulfate reduction at pH 4.0 for treatment of process and wastewaters.

Martijn F M Bijmans1, Erik de Vries, Chun-Hui Yang, Cees J N Buisman, Piet N L Lens, Mark Dopson.   

Abstract

Acidic industrial process and wastewaters often contain high sulfate and metal concentrations and their direct biological treatment is thus far not possible as biological processes at pH < 5 have been neglected. Sulfate-reducing bacteria convert sulfate to sulfide that can subsequently be used to recover metals as metal-sulfides precipitate. This study reports on high-rate sulfate reduction with a mixed microbial community at pH 4.0 and 4.5 with hydrogen and/or formate as electron donors. The maximum sulfate reducing activity at pH 4.0 was sustained for over 40 days with a specific activity 500-fold greater than previously reported values: 151 mmol sulfate reduced/L reactor liquid per day with a maximum specific activity of 84 mmol sulfate per gram of volatile suspended solids per day. The biomass yield gradually decreased from 38 to 0.4 g volatile suspended solids per kilogram of sulfate when decreasing the reactor pH from pH 6 to 4. The microorganisms had a high maintenance requirement probably due maintaining pH homeostasis and the toxicity of sulfide at low pH. The microbial community diversity in the pH 4.0 membrane bioreactor decreased over time, while the diversity of the sulfate reducing community increased. Thus, a specialized microbial community containing a lower proportion of microorganisms capable of activity at pH 4 developed in the reactor compared with those present at the start of the experiment. The 16S rRNA genes identified from the pH 4.0 grown mixed culture were most similar to those of Desulfovibrio species and Desulfosporosinus sp. M1. (c) 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306533     DOI: 10.1002/btpr.400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Prog        ISSN: 1520-6033


  6 in total

1.  Screening of anaerobic activities in sediments of an acidic environment: Tinto River.

Authors:  Irene Sánchez-Andrea; Patricia Rojas-Ojeda; Ricardo Amils; José Luis Sanz
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  A Small-Volume, Low-Cost, and Versatile Continuous Culture Device.

Authors:  Dominick Matteau; Vincent Baby; Stéphane Pelletier; Sébastien Rodrigue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Electricity generation from an inorganic sulfur compound containing mining wastewater by acidophilic microorganisms.

Authors:  Gaofeng Ni; Stephan Christel; Pawel Roman; Zhen Lim Wong; Martijn F M Bijmans; Mark Dopson
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Sulfur Reduction at Hyperthermoacidophilic Conditions with Mesophilic Anaerobic Sludge as the Inoculum.

Authors:  Adrian Hidalgo-Ulloa; Irene Sánchez-Andrea; Cees Buisman; Jan Weijma
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  High rate production of concentrated sulfides from metal bearing wastewater in an expanded bed hydrogenotrophic sulfate reducing bioreactor.

Authors:  Pieter Ostermeyer; Josefien Van Landuyt; Luiza Bonin; Karel Folens; Adam Williamson; Tom Hennebel; Korneel Rabaey
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-04-06

6.  Complete genome sequences of Desulfosporosinus orientis DSM765T, Desulfosporosinus youngiae DSM17734T, Desulfosporosinus meridiei DSM13257T, and Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus DSM22704T.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Evelyne Brambilla; Didier Alazard; Thomas Rattei; Thomas Weinmaier; James Han; Susan Lucas; Alla Lapidus; Jan-Fang Cheng; Lynne Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Lin Peters; Galina Ovchinnikova; Hazuki Teshima; John C Detter; Cliff S Han; Roxanne Tapia; Miriam L Land; Loren Hauser; Nikos C Kyrpides; Natalia N Ivanova; Ioanna Pagani; Marcel Huntmann; Chia-Lin Wei; Karen W Davenport; Hajnalka Daligault; Patrick S G Chain; Amy Chen; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Victor Markowitz; Ernest Szeto; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Michael Wagner; Tanja Woyke; Bernard Ollivier; Hans-Peter Klenk; Stefan Spring; Alexander Loy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.490

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.