PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetic profile of pantoprazole granules was assessed in neonates and preterm infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either the pantoprazole 1.25 mg (approx. 0.6 mg/kg) or 2.5 mg (approx. 1.2-mg/kg) group and treated for > or =5 consecutive days. Blood was sampled either at 0, 2, 8, and 18 h postdose or at 0, 1, 4, and 12 h postdose on day 1 and at 3 and 6 h postdose after > or =5 consecutive doses. Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) and CYP3A4 genotypes were determined. Safety was monitored. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) analyses were conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: The popPK modeling of the pantoprazole 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg groups obtained mean (+/-standard deviation) estimates for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 3.54 (+/-2.82) and 7.27 (+/-5.30) microg h/mL, respectively, and mean estimates for half-life of 3.1 (+/-1.5) and 2.7 (+/-1.1) h, respectively. Pantoprazole did not accumulate following multiple-dose administration. The two patients with the CYP2C19 poor metabolizer genotype had a substantially higher AUC than extensive metabolizers. No safety-related discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants and neonates, pantoprazole granules were generally well tolerated, mean exposures with pantoprazole 2.5 mg were slightly higher than that in adults who received 40 mg. While the half-life was longer, accumulation did not occur.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetic profile of pantoprazole granules was assessed in neonates and preterm infants with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. METHODS:Patients were randomly assigned to either the pantoprazole 1.25 mg (approx. 0.6 mg/kg) or 2.5 mg (approx. 1.2-mg/kg) group and treated for > or =5 consecutive days. Blood was sampled either at 0, 2, 8, and 18 h postdose or at 0, 1, 4, and 12 h postdose on day 1 and at 3 and 6 h postdose after > or =5 consecutive doses. Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) and CYP3A4 genotypes were determined. Safety was monitored. Population pharmacokinetics (popPK) analyses were conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. RESULTS: The popPK modeling of the pantoprazole 1.25 mg and 2.5 mg groups obtained mean (+/-standard deviation) estimates for the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 3.54 (+/-2.82) and 7.27 (+/-5.30) microg h/mL, respectively, and mean estimates for half-life of 3.1 (+/-1.5) and 2.7 (+/-1.1) h, respectively. Pantoprazole did not accumulate following multiple-dose administration. The two patients with the CYP2C19 poor metabolizer genotype had a substantially higher AUC than extensive metabolizers. No safety-related discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In preterm infants and neonates, pantoprazole granules were generally well tolerated, mean exposures with pantoprazole 2.5 mg were slightly higher than that in adults who received 40 mg. While the half-life was longer, accumulation did not occur.
Authors: Sevasti B Koukouritaki; Jason R Manro; Sandra A Marsh; Jeffrey C Stevens; Allan E Rettie; D Gail McCarver; Ronald N Hines Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2003-11-21 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: M Tanaka; T Ohkubo; K Otani; A Suzuki; S Kaneko; K Sugawara; Y Ryokawa; H Hakusui; S Yamamori; T Ishizaki Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1997-12 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Gregory L Kearns; Jeffrey Blumer; Stephen Schexnayder; Laura P James; Kim G Adcock; Michael D Reed; James F Daniel; Andrea Gaedigk; Jeffrey Paul Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2008-07-29 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Gregory L Kearns; Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Sarah W Alander; Douglas L Blowey; J Steven Leeder; Ralph E Kauffman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elizabeth H Doby; Daniel K Benjamin; Anne J Blaschke; Robert M Ward; Andrew T Pavia; Paul L Martin; Timothy A Driscoll; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Cassandra Moran Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Robert M Ward; Gregory L Kearns; Brinda Tammara; Phyllis Bishop; Molly A O'Gorman; Laura P James; Mitchell H Katz; Mary K Maguire; Natalie Rath; Xu Meng; Gail M Comer Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Matthew M Laughon; Debbie Avant; Nidhi Tripathi; Christoph P Hornik; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Reese H Clark; P Brian Smith; William Rodriguez Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Justine Badée; Stephen Fowler; Saskia N de Wildt; Abby C Collier; Stephan Schmidt; Neil Parrott Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 6.447