Literature DB >> 20306000

Evolving early (pre-dementia) Alzheimer's disease trials: suit the outcomes to the population and study design.

R S Doody1.   

Abstract

Assuming that some cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) could be prevented or delayed, prevention trials will be developed for this neurodegenerative condition. Initially, stakeholders will have to agree about the definition of prevention-true primary prevention, meaning the prevention of AD neuropathological changes; the prevention of clinical signs and symptoms that often augur AD; or preventing the progression of signs and symptoms to full-blown dementia. True primary prevention trials will have to rely completely upon neuroimaging or biomarker outcomes that reflect AD pathology. On the other hand, trials designed to prevent signs and symptoms of dementia will require researchers to agree on the phenomenology that would constitute an unequivocal endpoint: cognitive worsening on one or more measure compared to a normative group; development of Mild cognitive impairment (MCI); or development of Alzheimer's dementia. Prevention trials utilizing any of these outcomes in the general public will be large, will have to utilize low risk public health interventions, and might therefore have only a small impact (treatment effect size), especially if the studies are too short or the study populations are too diverse. An alternative to interventions aimed at the general public would be any attempt to prevent signs and symptoms of dementia in individuals thought to be at an increased risk for clinical dementia. These trials could try to reduce the development of signs and symptoms of dementia in cognitively normal subjects, or they could try to prevent progression from some form of Mild Cognitive Impairment to AD, or they could have the more subtle goal of reducing the accumulation of subclinical deficits in MCI subjects. If the populations for these trials are limited to individuals who have abnormal laboratory and neuroimaging studies associated with AD neuropathology, the results will not generalize to biomarker-negative, at risk individuals, who are likely to constitute the majority of any clinically relevant study population. Outcome measures for each study design will depend upon the characteristics of the study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20306000     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-010-0067-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  24 in total

1.  Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome.

Authors:  R C Petersen; G E Smith; S C Waring; R J Ivnik; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1999-03

2.  CSF biomarkers and medial temporal lobe atrophy predict dementia in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  F H Bouwman; S N M Schoonenboom; W M van der Flier; E J van Elk; A Kok; F Barkhof; M A Blankenstein; Ph Scheltens
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  PET of brain amyloid and tau in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Gary W Small; Vladimir Kepe; Linda M Ercoli; Prabha Siddarth; Susan Y Bookheimer; Karen J Miller; Helen Lavretsky; Alison C Burggren; Greg M Cole; Harry V Vinters; Paul M Thompson; S-C Huang; N Satyamurthy; Michael E Phelps; Jorge R Barrio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study.

Authors:  Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Markers of Alzheimer's disease in a population attending a memory clinic.

Authors:  Giovanni B Frisoni; Annapaola Prestia; Orazio Zanetti; Samantha Galluzzi; Melissa Romano; Maria Cotelli; Massimo Gennarelli; Giuliano Binetti; Luisella Bocchio; Barbara Paghera; Giovanni Amicucci; Matteo Bonetti; Luisa Benussi; Roberta Ghidoni; Cristina Geroldi
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Prevention protocols for Alzheimer disease. Position paper from the International Working Group on Harmonization of Dementia Drug Guidelines.

Authors:  L J Thal; A Carta; R Doody; P Leber; R Mohs; L Schneider; S Shimohama; C Silber
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.703

7.  Cerebrospinal fluid biomarker signature in Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative subjects.

Authors:  Leslie M Shaw; Hugo Vanderstichele; Malgorzata Knapik-Czajka; Christopher M Clark; Paul S Aisen; Ronald C Petersen; Kaj Blennow; Holly Soares; Adam Simon; Piotr Lewczuk; Robert Dean; Eric Siemers; William Potter; Virginia M-Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  A S Fleisher; B B Sowell; C Taylor; A C Gamst; R C Petersen; L J Thal
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study.

Authors:  Oskar Hansson; Henrik Zetterberg; Peder Buchhave; Elisabet Londos; Kaj Blennow; Lennart Minthon
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 10.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.

Authors:  H Braak; E Braak
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.088

View more
  4 in total

1.  Pro-dromal sarcopenia.

Authors:  D L Waters
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.075

2.  Recruitment, retention and other methodological issues related to clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Early Alzheimer's trials: new developments.

Authors:  B Vellas; P S Aisen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 4.  Pre-dementia Alzheimer's trials: overview.

Authors:  P S Aisen
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.