Literature DB >> 20305754

Nutritient intake of young children with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Marianne Lindmark1, Kerstin Trygg, Kaja Giltvedt, Svein O Kolset.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is a rare genetic disorder resulting in obesity. The diets for young children with PWS must balance the importance of preventing development of obesity with the need to supply sufficient energy and essential nutrients.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the nutritional intake for children with PWS 2, 3, and 4 years of age and compare it with Nordic Nutritional Recommendations (NNR) and intake of healthy controls.
DESIGN: Assessments of food intake for six children 2-4 years of age were performed twice a year. At the age of 2 and 3 years data was obtained by using food recall interviews and at 4 year of age a pre-coded food-diary was used.
RESULTS: The energy intake for the 2-year-old children was 3.25 MJ/day (SD 0.85) and for the 3- and 4-year olds 3.62 MJ/day (SD 0.73) and 4.07 MJ/day (SD 0.39 MJ), respectively. These intakes are 61%, 68%, and 77% of the estimated energy requirements in NNR for healthy 2-, 3- and 4-year-old children, respectively, and 60% and 66% of the energy intakes of 2- and 4-year-old children in reference populations. The children's BMI-for-age score and length growth was within the normal range during the study period. The intake of fat was about 25 E% in all age groups and reduced when compared with reference populations. In 25% of the assessments the fat intake was 20 E% or below. The intake of iron was below recommendations in all age groups both with and without supplementation. The mean intake of vitamin D and tocopherol was below recommendations when intakes were determined excluding dietary supplementations.
CONCLUSIONS: More large-scale investigations on nutritional intake are needed to further investigate dietary challenges for this patient group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prader–Willi syndrome; child; dietetics; energy intake; fat; micronutrients; unsaturated fatty acids

Year:  2010        PMID: 20305754      PMCID: PMC2842107          DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v54i0.2112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Nutr Res        ISSN: 1654-661X            Impact factor:   3.894


The Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is a complex, multisystem disorder of genetic origin due to lack of paternally active genes in chromosome 15 q11–q13. The birth incidence of the condition is reported to be 1:22,000 to 1:29,000 with no gender or ethnic differences of distribution (1–3). The three different genetic mechanisms leading to PWS are deletions (70%), maternal uniparental disomies (UPD) (28%), and imprinting defects (>2%) (4). The major clinical features include neonatal hypotonia and failure to thrive and childhood onset of hyperphagia that typically occurs from age between 2 and 6 years of age, which in turn, will lead to obesity in the absence of energy restrictions. Other features include short stature, hypogonadism, learning disability, developmental delay, and behavioral problems (4–6). Hypothalamic dysfunction may be responsible for many of the clinical features seen in PWS (7). The management of PWS involves a multidisciplinary life-long approach to improve quality of life, prevent complications, and prolong life expectancy. Prevention and treatment of obesity is essential and depend on a low-energy and well-balanced diet with rigorous supervision and restriction of food access, combined with regular meals and exercise (8). The nutritional intakes for persons with PWS have traditionally been described as having two phases. Firstly, poor feeding and frequent failure to thrive, occurring from birth to early infancy and secondly, the onset of hyperphagia leading to obesity. A more complex progression and development with several nutritional phases during the first year has also been reported (9). The energy requirements for children from 8 year of age and adults with PWS are found to be 20–30% reduced compared with healthy age-matched controls (10, 11). The lower energy expenditure is to a large degree explained by reduced metabolic rate and due to altered body composition with a lower muscle mass (11, 12). Furthermore, persons with PWS have been reported to have a more inactive lifestyle (11, 13). There has been less focus on the energy requirements of young children with PWS than those of older children and adults. Guidelines on energy requirements for children with PWS must therefore be used with caution. Excessive energy intake may lead to overweight, whereas inadequate energy intake may have serious consequence for the children's growth and development. Today, many of the children with PWS are diagnosed during their first month of life due to the presence of neonatal hypotonia, which leads to genetic testing and diagnosis. Parents and caregivers will therefore at an early stage become aware of the high risk for development of obesity for their children. However, there are no established routines in Norway today involving counseling with a registered dietitian at the time of diagnosis. This leaves parents and caregivers with the challenges of preventing development of obesity combined with presenting a diet with sufficient energy and essential nutrients to ensure optimal growth and development. To the best of our knowledge there are no systematic studies published on the actual nutritional intake in persons with PWS. This is a paradox since specific diet-regimes are recommended and widely used as part of the management for this condition (8). The recommended regime includes reduced access to foods, drinks, and rigorous supervision. To deprive a person the opportunities to influence his/her own food intake raises important ethical issues. In PWS restriction of food availability and strict monitoring is considered to be in the best interest for the person(s) involved. However, this also raises the need to make sure the diet is nutritionally sufficient in all essential nutrients and in accordance with general recommendations on diets for optimal health and development. The nutritional intake for young children in growth and development is especially an important issue. The aim of this study was to investigate the nutritional intake for young children with PWS in Norway and to compare it with Nordic Nutritional Recommendations (NNR) (14) and with healthy age-matched Norwegian children as reference population (15, 16). Results presented suggest that total intake of energy and fat for young children with PWS is reduced compared with age-matched reference populations, and that the intake of micronutrients is low for several nutrients if dietary supplements are not used.

Subjects

The parents of seven children with PWS born in Norway from 2000 to 2002 were invited to participate in this study in 2003. The diagnoses were genetically verified by florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) chromosome test and DNA-analysis for the one child with maternal uniparental disomy (UPD). At the time of invitation the families were given both written and oral information about the study. All invited families accepted the invitation and gave written informed consent to participate. The study group constituted the total known population of children alive with PWS in Norway born in this particular period. All the children in this study were diagnosed with PWS in their first months of life. One child died early in the study period and data on six children are therefore presented here (three male and three female). The project was approved by Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics and Norwegian Social Science Data Service.

Methods

Four assessments of food intake at the age of 2 and 3 years were performed. The first, third, and fourth assessments were by food recall interview with parents and day-care personnel, either at their homes or in the day-care centers. The second assessment during this period was completed by only interviewing one of the parents via telephone. There was approximately a period of six months between the different assessments. The interviews were performed by the same person who was a registered dietitian. The year the children reached 4 years of age, the parents recorded the food consumption by using a pre-coded food-diary in two registration periods separated by approximately six months, with three or four days of reporting on each occasion. The pre-coded food-diary has been developed for and used in national food surveys in Norway for 4-, 9- and 13-year-old children in the general population (17). All the recorded data was encoded and analyzed using a food database and software systems developed at the Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo. Medical background information was collected from the records of the local hospitals. Data on weight and height were collected from records of the local maternal and child health centers. Body mass indexes (BMI) at different ages are calculated and are presented together with BMI Z-scores and medical background information in Table 1.
Table 1

Medical background information

Genetic mechanismAge at start of GHa treatment2 years3 years4 years



BMIZ-score (SD)BMIZ-score (SD)BMIZ-score (SD)
Child 1Deletion3.8 years17.5+1.1317.8+1.4017.6+1.27
Child 2Deletion4.0 years15.8−0.1416.9+0.7714.7−1.0
Child 3DeletionNo treatment during study period15.1−0.4216.5+0.6416.8+0.86
Child 4UPDb4.0 years16.2+0.3615.7+0.0715.4−0.08
Child 5Deletion3.9 years15.2−0.3316.5+0.2915.4−0.16
Child 6Deletion4.0 years16.0+0.0414.3−1.4814.5−1.19

aGrowth hormone.

bMaternal uniparental disomy.

Medical background information aGrowth hormone. bMaternal uniparental disomy.

Data

Descriptive statistics with mean intake and standard derivations was used to describe the data. The energy intakes were compared with estimated energy requirements in NNR (14) and data from healthy age-matched Norwegian children in the general population (15, 16). Similar the intakes of energy-yielding nutrients were compared with age-matched reference populations (15, 16) and NNR (14). The intake of micronutrients was evaluated against NNR (14) and calculated as percentage of these recommendations. For those micronutrients where the intakes were below recommendations we also describe the intakes in the reference populations (15, 16). Intakes of nutrients from dietary supplements are presented separately together with information on how many children using supplementations.

Results

The mean total energy intake for the 2-year-old children with PWS was 3.25 MJ/day, and 3.62 and 4.07 MJ/day for the 3- and 4-year-old children, respectively. These energy intakes are 61%, 68%, and 77% of the estimated energy requirements in NNR for the 2-, 3- and 4-year-old children, respectively, as can be seen in Table 2. For the 2- and 4-year-old children the corresponding percentages were 60% and 66%, compared to age-matched children in the reference populations (15, 16).
Table 2

Daily intake of energy, vitamins, and minerals

2 years (n=6)3 years (n=6)4 years (n=6)



Mean (SD)aNNR (%)bMean (SD)aNNR (%)bMean (SD)aNNR (%)b
Energy (MJ)3.25 (0.85)613.62 (0.73)684.07 (0.39)77
Retinol (μ)2,019 (1,292)5761,384 (953)3951,025 (565)292
Vitamin D (μ)15.6 (14.5)20815.1 (6.2)2017.2 (4.5)96
Tocopherol (mg)13.2 (11.6)26415.1 (5.4)3029.8 (3.9)195
Thiamin (mg)1.2 (0.5)2001.1 (0.6)1831.2 (0.4)200
Riboflavin (mg)1.54 (0.75)2201.48 (0.83)2111.58 (0.52)166
Ascorbic acid (mg)80 (32)26652 (24)17363 (21)210
Calcium (mg)596 (332)99602 (111)100710 (117)118
Iron (mg)6.9 (3.2)866.7 (3.7)847.7 (3.5)96
Magnesium (mg)144 (57)120157 (35)131180 (36)150

aStandard deviation.

bPercent of Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004.

cDietary supplements included.

Daily intake of energy, vitamins, and minerals aStandard deviation. bPercent of Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004. cDietary supplements included. The children with PWS had a mean length growth during the study period of 20.0 cm (SD 4.0). Five of the six children started growth hormone treatment around the age of 4 (see Table 1). Mean growth for healthy children in the same age period is 20.5 cm (18). The children with PWS have in general a low intake of fat. The mean energy percent from fat was 24 E% for the 2-year olds, and 25 E% for both 3- and 4-year olds. These intakes are below the general recommendations for the population and far below those of the reference populations. The intakes of both saturated fat and monounsaturated fat are reduced when compared with intakes of the reference populations, as can be seen in Table 3, and also below recommendations in NNR (14). The mean intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) was approximately half of the intake of the reference populations, when compared as actual intake (g), but only 7% and 12% reduced when the intakes are compared as percent of total energy intake (15, 16).The mean intake of PUFA was within recommendations in NNR (14).
Table 3

Daily intake of energy-yielding nutrients

2 years (n=6)3 years (n=6)4 years (n=6)


Mean (SD)aRP (SD)a,bMean (SD)aMean (SD)aRP (SD)a,c
Fat E%23.8 (7.3)33.3 (5.1)24.8 (5.1)24.5 (4.3)32.5 (4.8)
Saturated fat E%7.6 (2.8)14.2 (2.7)8.3 (2.5)9.3 (2.3)14.2 (2.5)
Monounsaturated fat E%7.9 (3.3)10.4 (1.8)8.1 (1.8)8.0 (1.8)9.9 (1.7)
Polyunsaturated fat E%5.6 (2.4)5.7 (1.9)5.4 (1.9)5.0 (1.4)6.0 (1.7)
Protein E%16.6 (3.7)13.4 (1.8)18.1 (2.9)20.3 (2.1)14.1 (2.5)
Carbohydrate E%57.3 (7.1)53.3 (5.6)56.8 (6.6)55.2 (5.8)53.5 (5.5)
Sugar E%4.3 (5.6)11.7 (5.8)2.6 (2.0)5.0 (4.9)15.2 (5.5)

aStandard deviation.

bMean intake in Reference population (15).

cMean intake in Reference population (16).

In 25% of the assessments the intake of fat was 20 E% or less of the total energy intake. In most of these assessments the intakes of PUFA were below recommendations (14). The intake of protein was higher when expressed as percent of total energy intake in the PWS population compared with the reference populations for both the 2- and 4-year olds. However, when expressed as gram protein per kg the intake was 3.0 g/kg for the 2-year-old children with PWS and 3.7 g/kg in the reference population (15). For the 3-year olds the intakes in the PWS group was 3.1 g/kg, and for the 4-year-old children 3.2 g/kg in the PWS group and 2.9 g/kg in the reference population (16). The intake of protein in the PWS groups was within the recommended level of intake in NNR on all assessments (14). The intake of carbohydrates expressed as percent of total energy intake was similar both in children with PWS at different age and the reference populations, as can be seen in Table 3. The intakes of carbohydrates for the children with PWS were within the NNR recommendations (14). However, the mean intakes of sugar for the children with PWS were considerably lower than intakes in the reference populations (15, 16), and within the recommendations (14). Daily intake of energy-yielding nutrients aStandard deviation. bMean intake in Reference population (15). cMean intake in Reference population (16). In general, the diets contained enough water-soluble vitamins even without supplementations. However, the mean intake of vitamin D was only 26%, 38%, and 32% of NNR for the 2-, 3-, and 4-year olds, respectively, when excluding the dietary supplements. Similarly the intake of tocopherol was 47%, 45%, and 57% of NNR for the 2-, 3-, and 4-year olds, respectively. However, it is worth noting that the intake of vitamin D in the reference population was only 35% of NNR in both the 2- and 4-year-old children when calculated without supplementations, whereas the intake of tocopherol was 84% and 90% of NNR for the 2- and 4-year-old children in the reference population (15, 16). The mean intake of iron in the PWS group was found to be somewhat below NNR in all age groups (84–96%), as can be seen in Table 2. Similar levels of intakes have also been reported in the reference population with an intake at 89% and 83% of NNR in the 2- and 4-year-old children (15, 16). The mean intake of calcium reached the recommended level in the PWS children, but the intakes differed to a large extent within the 2- and 3-year-old groups. Three of six children at 2 years of age and two of those 3 years of age did not reach the recommended level of intake. The children with low intake of calcium drank milk only occasionally and mainly used dairy products as part of food preparations. The mean intake of calcium in the reference population was 129% and 113% of NNR for the 2- and 4-year-old children, respectively (15, 16). The use of dietary supplementation and how this affects the mean intake of energy, vitamins, and minerals in the different age-groups are presented in Table 4. The children with PWS used supplementation with either cod liver oil, multivitamins, multivitamin-minerals, or a combination of these. Most children used one dietary supplement but some used a combination of two. At the age of 2 years, one child used a combination of cod liver oil and multivitamin mineral. At the age of 3 years, none combined several supplements. Finally, at 4 years of age one child used a combination of cod liver oil and multivitamin-minerals, whereas one child used cod liver oil and multivitamins. Cod liver oil increases the intake of the fat-soluble vitamins as well as PUFA.
Table 4

Daily intake of energy, vitamins, and minerals from dietary supplements

2 years3 years4 years



MeanNbMeanNbMeanNb
Energy (MJ)0.0220.1430.082
Retinol (μ)1,571598053595
Vitamin D (μ)13.6512.254.84
Tocopherol (mg)10.8512.856.94
Thiamin (mg)0.5530.3720.323
Riboflavin (mg)0.6330.4420.33
Ascorbic acid (mg)223162123
Calcium (mg)000000
Iron (mg)000.611.71
Magnesium (mg)13113100

aType of dietary supplements used: Cod liver oil, multivitamin, and multivitamin minerals.

bNumber of children using dietary supplement of the nutrient.

Daily intake of energy, vitamins, and minerals from dietary supplements aType of dietary supplements used: Cod liver oil, multivitamin, and multivitamin minerals. bNumber of children using dietary supplement of the nutrient.

Discussion

This study on the nutritional intake for children with PWS involves a small number of participants. Seven children were recruited for the study. Based on data on birth rate in Norway for 2000–2002 (19) divided with the number of children with PWS recruited for this study give an incidence of 1:24,447. Given the reported incidence for PWS we conclude that our study most likely include all children alive with PWS born in Norway from 2000 to 2002. Self-reported methods as those used in this study may be subject to bias and underestimations of energy intake have been reported (17, 20). We collected data twice a year to limit the difference in dietary intake due to seasonal differences. The pre-coded food-diary used for the 4-year-old children has been validated and shown to give a lower intake of energy, fat, and sugar compared to 24-h recall (21). Furthermore, compared to energy expenditure data the underreporting with this method was 18% (22). In this study we show that the children with PWS have approximately 20–40% reduced energy intake compared to NNR and surveys among other Norwegian children their age (14). Children with PWS are expected to have a reduced requirement for energy, even though this has not been a subject of proper investigations and the literature mostly refers to clinical experiences (9). The literature suggested that the energy intakes are restricted to prevent obesity, but there is some disagreement at what age the reduced energy requirements starts and the extent of energy restrictions required (9). Uncertainties on energy requirements for small children with PWS and the widespread use of growth hormone treatment seen today, emphasize the need for more investigations on energy requirements. We found no support for reduced growth due to reduced energy intake among the children in our study. We also found normal BMI-for-age throughout the study period. These findings support the notion that energy intake was appropriate for the children studied. In another study a fat-reduced and carbohydrate modified diet providing 10 kcal/cm (42 kJ/cm) of height starting at the second year of life, resulted in shorter stature when compared with a control group of persons with PWS diagnosed at a later stage in life (23). Our data suggest that some parents and caregivers of children with PWS restrict the intake of fat too much. Very low intakes of fat (e.g. below 20 E% of total energy intake) increase the risk for inadequate intake of PUFA. This may have negative consequences for brain and nervous system development (24). This finding indicates that parents of children with PWS may need professional assistance on food selection. The guidance should include information on foods with appropriate fat content and how much fat the children need. High intakes of sugar are one of the nutritional challenges for children in Norway (25). More than 50% of the children 2 years of age (15), and 80% of children 4 years of age (16) in the general population consume more sugar than recommended. The intake of sugar in the PWS population was considerably below the intakes of the reference populations. The difference in intake of sugars is mainly explained by the difference in consumption of soft drinks. The data presented also show that children with PWS have low intake of several essential nutrients. This is mainly due to the reduced intake of energy. Our findings suggest that children with PWS may need dietary supplementation of vitamin D and tocopherol, and the minerals iron and calcium. Calcium could also be increased by increasing the diet contents of low-fat dairy products. Due to the increased reported risk for osteoporosis supplementation of vitamin D and calcium are recommended for individuals with PWS (26). Many of the children in our study used dietary supplementation, but none used calcium supplementation even though this is a clear recommendation for the patient group. Parents and caregivers of young children with PWS should be offered evaluations of the dietary intake by a registered dietitian to ensure optimal growth and development. Attention should be given to the intake of energy, fat, vitamin D, tocopherol, iron, and calcium. More large-scale investigations on the dietary intake of people with PWS should be performed.
  19 in total

1.  Energy expenditure at rest and during sleep in children with Prader-Willi syndrome is explained by body composition.

Authors:  E A van Mil; K R Westerterp; W J Gerver; L M Curfs; C T Schrander-Stumpel; A D Kester; W H Saris
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Validation of a pre-coded food diary with energy expenditure, comparison of under-reporters v. acceptable reporters.

Authors:  I T L Lillegaard; L F Andersen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.718

3.  The changing purpose of Prader-Willi syndrome clinical diagnostic criteria and proposed revised criteria.

Authors:  M Gunay-Aygun; S Schwartz; S Heeger; M A O'Riordan; S B Cassidy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Prader-Willi syndrome and the hypothalamus.

Authors:  D F Swaab
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Suppl       Date:  1997-11

5.  Comparison of diet measures from a food-frequency questionnaire with measures from repeated 24-hour dietary recalls. The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study.

Authors:  Anette Hjartåker; Lene Frost Andersen; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  A long-term population-based clinical and morbidity review of Prader-Willi syndrome in Western Australia.

Authors:  A K Thomson; E J Glasson; A H Bittles
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2006-01

7.  Successful early dietary intervention avoids obesity in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome: a ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  H Schmidt; S Bechtold-Dalla Pozza; W Bonfig; H P Schwarz; K Dokoupil
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.634

8.  Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  A P Goldstone; A J Holland; B P Hauffa; A C Hokken-Koelega; M Tauber
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Minimum prevalence, birth incidence and cause of death for Prader-Willi syndrome in Flanders.

Authors:  Annick Vogels; Jenneke Van Den Ende; Kathelijne Keymolen; Geert Mortier; Koen Devriendt; E Legius; J P Fryns
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Prader-Willi syndrome: consensus diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  V A Holm; S B Cassidy; M G Butler; J M Hanchett; L R Greenswag; B Y Whitman; F Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  7 in total

1.  Normal and unusual days for dietary intake during the 12 months after a breast cancer diagnosis in women.

Authors:  Sonja H Brunvoll; Vidar G Flote; Eline H Halset; Gro F Bertheussen; Helle Skjerven; Jon Lømo; Inger Thune; Anette Hjartåker
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  A reduced-energy intake, well-balanced diet improves weight control in children with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  J L Miller; C H Lynn; J Shuster; D J Driscoll
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.089

3.  Prader-Willi syndrome: A primer for clinicians.

Authors:  Mary Cataletto; Moris Angulo; Gila Hertz; Barbara Whitman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2011-10-18

4.  The associations between diet and physical activity with body composition and walking a timed distance in adults with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Susan G Woods; Allen Knehans; Sandra Arnold; Carol Dionne; Leah Hoffman; Peggy Turner; Jonathan Baldwin
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  A multidisciplinary approach to the clinical management of Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica Duis; Pieter J van Wattum; Ann Scheimann; Parisa Salehi; Elly Brokamp; Laura Fairbrother; Anna Childers; Althea Robinson Shelton; Nathan C Bingham; Ashley H Shoemaker; Jennifer L Miller
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.183

6.  Validation of energy intake recorded by a 7-day pre-coded food diary against measured energy expenditure in a group of Norwegian adults.

Authors:  Anne Marte Wetting Johansen; Jannicke Borch Myhre; Anette Hjartåker; Lene Frost Andersen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Nutritional intakes in children with Prader-Willi syndrome and non-congenital obesity.

Authors:  Daniela A Rubin; Jill Nowak; Erin McLaren; Monzeratt Patiño; Diobel M Castner; Marilyn C Dumont-Driscoll
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.