BACKGROUND: Country-specific patients' registries are rarely used to make international comparisons because of protocol discrepancies in data collation. We present data from a European cystic fibrosis registry that is dedicated to collection of demographic data, and assess whether the resources available in countries with and without European Union (EU) membership affects care and survival of patients. METHODS: Data for demographic indicators-age, age at diagnosis, sex, and genotype-for patients with cystic fibrosis from 35 European countries were combined, and used to establish the differences in demographic indicators between EU and non-EU countries. EU membership status in 2003 was used to divide countries. We modelled demographic indicators of EU countries on non-EU countries to estimate the size of the cystic fibrosis population if non-EU countries had had the same resources available for patients as did EU countries. FINDINGS: Data were gathered for 29 025 patients, who had a median age of 16.3 years (IQR 8.9-24.8), with a difference of 4.9 years (95% CI 4.4-5.1; p<0.0001) between EU (median 17.0 years, IQR 9.5-25.6) and non-EU countries (12.1 years, 6.0-19.2). The proportion of patients older than 40 years was higher in EU countries (1205 [5%]) than in non-EU countries (76 [2%]), with an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.0, p<0.0001). We estimated that the cystic fibrosis population in non-EU countries would increase by 84% if patients had a demographic profile comparable to that of patients in EU countries. INTERPRETATION: Future studies need to establish the reasons for the lower proportion of patients with cystic fibrosis in non-EU countries than in EU countries, such as underdiagnosis and premature childhood mortality. FUNDING: European Community's Sixth Framework Programme for Research, and Czech Ministry of Health. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Country-specific patients' registries are rarely used to make international comparisons because of protocol discrepancies in data collation. We present data from a European cystic fibrosis registry that is dedicated to collection of demographic data, and assess whether the resources available in countries with and without European Union (EU) membership affects care and survival of patients. METHODS: Data for demographic indicators-age, age at diagnosis, sex, and genotype-for patients with cystic fibrosis from 35 European countries were combined, and used to establish the differences in demographic indicators between EU and non-EU countries. EU membership status in 2003 was used to divide countries. We modelled demographic indicators of EU countries on non-EU countries to estimate the size of the cystic fibrosis population if non-EU countries had had the same resources available for patients as did EU countries. FINDINGS: Data were gathered for 29 025 patients, who had a median age of 16.3 years (IQR 8.9-24.8), with a difference of 4.9 years (95% CI 4.4-5.1; p<0.0001) between EU (median 17.0 years, IQR 9.5-25.6) and non-EU countries (12.1 years, 6.0-19.2). The proportion of patients older than 40 years was higher in EU countries (1205 [5%]) than in non-EU countries (76 [2%]), with an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.9-3.0, p<0.0001). We estimated that the cystic fibrosis population in non-EU countries would increase by 84% if patients had a demographic profile comparable to that of patients in EU countries. INTERPRETATION: Future studies need to establish the reasons for the lower proportion of patients with cystic fibrosis in non-EU countries than in EU countries, such as underdiagnosis and premature childhood mortality. FUNDING: European Community's Sixth Framework Programme for Research, and Czech Ministry of Health. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Christopher H Goss; Stephanie J MacNeill; Hebe B Quinton; Bruce C Marshall; Alexander Elbert; Emily A Knapp; Kristofer Petren; Elaine Gunn; Joanne Osmond; Diana Bilton Journal: Thorax Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Felix Ratjen; Scott C Bell; Steven M Rowe; Christopher H Goss; Alexandra L Quittner; Andrew Bush Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Gerd Döring; Alessandra Bragonzi; Moira Paroni; Firdevs-Fatma Aktürk; Cristina Cigana; Annika Schmidt; Deirdre Gilpin; Susanne Heyder; Torsten Born; Christina Smaczny; Martin Kohlhäufl; Thomas O F Wagner; Michael R Loebinger; Diana Bilton; Michael M Tunney; J Stuart Elborn; Gerald B Pier; Michael W Konstan; Martina Ulrich Journal: J Cyst Fibros Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Scott C Bell; Marcus A Mall; Hector Gutierrez; Milan Macek; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies; Pierre-Régis Burgel; Elizabeth Tullis; Claudio Castaños; Carlo Castellani; Catherine A Byrnes; Fiona Cathcart; Sanjay H Chotirmall; Rebecca Cosgriff; Irmgard Eichler; Isabelle Fajac; Christopher H Goss; Pavel Drevinek; Philip M Farrell; Anna M Gravelle; Trudy Havermans; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett; Nataliya Kashirskaya; Eitan Kerem; Joseph L Mathew; Edward F McKone; Lutz Naehrlich; Samya Z Nasr; Gabriela R Oates; Ciaran O'Neill; Ulrike Pypops; Karen S Raraigh; Steven M Rowe; Kevin W Southern; Sheila Sivam; Anne L Stephenson; Marco Zampoli; Felix Ratjen Journal: Lancet Respir Med Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 30.700
Authors: Anne L Stephenson; Jenna Sykes; Sanja Stanojevic; Bradley S Quon; Bruce C Marshall; Kristofer Petren; Josh Ostrenga; Aliza K Fink; Alexander Elbert; Christopher H Goss Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-03-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Rachel Thompson; Louise Johnston; Domenica Taruscio; Lucia Monaco; Christophe Béroud; Ivo G Gut; Mats G Hansson; Peter-Bram A 't Hoen; George P Patrinos; Hugh Dawkins; Monica Ensini; Kurt Zatloukal; David Koubi; Emma Heslop; Justin E Paschall; Manuel Posada; Peter N Robinson; Kate Bushby; Hanns Lochmüller Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.128