Literature DB >> 20303687

Breast surgical specimen radiographs: how reliable are they?

P D Britton1, L I Sonoda, A K Yamamoto, B Koo, E Soh, A Goud.   

Abstract

Radiography of the excised surgical specimen following wire guided localisation of impalpable breast lesions is standard surgical practice. The aims of the study were to establish the reliability of the breast specimen radiograph (SR) in determining lesion excision and to determine whether the radiographic margin correlated with the histological margin. The clinical, imaging, SR and pathological details of 106 patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The reliability of orientation was estimated and the appearance and distance from the mammographic abnormality to each radial margin were measured and correlated with surgical histological findings. The overall accuracy of the specimen radiograph in determining whether the mammographic lesion was present was 99%. The SR could be orientated "very reliably" or "reliably" in 80% of patients however in only 48% of patients did the closest margin on the SR correspond with the same nearest margin at final histology. A maximum measurement of 11 mm or more from the lesion to the specimen edge was associated with a 77% likelihood of having a clear final histological margin (taken as 5mm or more) and if <11 mm a 58% chance of having involved final histological margins. There was however a wide overlap in the results with patients having an apparently wide SR margin but histologically involved margins and vice versa. The SR is reliable at determining whether the target lesion has been removed. The correlation of SR margin orientation and measurement with final histological measurement is however far less reliable. Crown
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20303687     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

1.  What to look for on a breast specimen radiograph: lessons learnt.

Authors:  Donna Taylor
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-01-23

2.  A Phantom Study of Terahertz Spectroscopy and Imaging of Micro- and Nano-diamonds and Nano-onions as Contrast Agents for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tyler Bowman; Alec Walter; Olga Shenderova; Nicholas Nunn; Gary McGuire; Magda El-Shenawee
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-09-13

3.  Visualization of Breast Microcalcifications on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and 2-Dimensional Digital Mammography Using Specimens.

Authors:  Jieun Byun; Jee Eun Lee; Eun Suk Cha; Jin Chung; Jeoung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-04-12

4.  Breast lesion size assessment in mastectomy specimens: Correlation of cone-beam breast-CT, digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography with histopathology.

Authors:  Susanne Wienbeck; Johannes Uhlig; Uwe Fischer; Martin Hellriegel; Eva von Fintel; Dietrich Kulenkampff; Alexey Surov; Joachim Lotz; Christina Perske
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Intraoperative photoacoustic screening of breast cancer: a new perspective on malignancy visualization and surgical guidance.

Authors:  Ivan Kosik; Muriel Brackstone; Anat Kornecki; Astrid Chamson-Reig; Philip Wong; Morteza Heydari Araghi; Jeffrey J Carson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Re-Excision Rates in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with and without the Use of a Radiopaque Tissue Transfer and X-ray System.

Authors:  Suniza Jamaris; Leyla Akpolat-Basci; Miltiades Stephanou; Sarah Wetzig; Yueksel Cubuk; Johannes Gerharz; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Mee Hoong See; Cornelia Liedtke; Hans-Christian Kolberg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Deanna Attai; Dunya Atisha; Peter Beitsch; Linda Bosserman; Judy Boughey; Jodi Carter; Stephen Edge; Sheldon Feldman; Joshua Froman; Caprice Greenberg; Cary Kaufman; Monica Morrow; Barbara Pockaj; Melvin Silverstein; Lawrence Solin; Alicia Staley; Frank Vicini; Lee Wilke; Wei Yang; Hiram Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Accuracy of Specimen Radiography in Assessing Complete Local Excision with Breast-Conservation Surgery

Authors:  Saira Naz; Imrana Masroor; Shaista Afzal; Waseem Mirza; Sehrish Butt; Zafar Sajjad; Anwar Ahmad
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-03-27

9.  Ultrasound Guided Optoacoustic Tomography in Assessment of Tumor Margins for Lumpectomies.

Authors:  Yonggeng Goh; Ghayathri Balasundaram; Mohesh Moothanchery; Amalina Attia; Xiuting Li; Hann Qian Lim; Neal C Burton; Yi Qiu; Thomas Choudary Putti; Ching Wan Chan; Philip Iau; Shaik Ahmad Buhari; Mikael Hartman; Siau Wei Tang; Celene Wei Qi Ng; Yiong Huak Chan; Felicity Jane Pool; Premilla Pillay; Wynne Chua; Jeevesh Kapur; Pooja Jagmohan; Eide Sterling; Swee Tian Quek; Malini Olivo
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 4.243

10.  Indications and methods of intraoperative specimen radiography in breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Yong Sik Jung; Se Hwan Han; Ji Hyun Sung; Min Hee Hur
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.