Literature DB >> 31798390

Re-Excision Rates in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Breast Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with and without the Use of a Radiopaque Tissue Transfer and X-ray System.

Suniza Jamaris1, Leyla Akpolat-Basci2, Miltiades Stephanou3, Sarah Wetzig3, Yueksel Cubuk4, Johannes Gerharz4, Ann-Kathrin Bittner5, Mee Hoong See1, Cornelia Liedtke6, Hans-Christian Kolberg3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy may result from difficulties in defining the surgical target particularly in cases with excellent treatment response. Devices allowing an exact topographic localisation of the lesion in the resected tissue could reduce re-excision rates by optimising the intraoperative detection of involved margins.
METHODS: 80 patients with invasive breast cancer receiving BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included in this non-randomized case-control study. 40 patients with specimen radiography performed in a standard approach (control group) were compared to 40 patients with use of a radiopaque tissue transfer system (study group).
RESULTS: 19/80 (23.75%) patients required re-excision because of involved margins; among those, 14/40 (35%) were in the control group and 5/40 (12.5%) in the study group. The association between the use of the radiopaque tissue transfer system and the lower re-excision rate was statistically significant (p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides a rationale for the routine use of a radiopaque tissue transfer system for specimen radiography in BCS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer in order to reduce re-excision rates.
Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Klinitray™; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Re-excision rate; Specimen radiography

Year:  2018        PMID: 31798390      PMCID: PMC6883442          DOI: 10.1159/000493017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)        ISSN: 1661-3791            Impact factor:   2.860


  35 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer versus wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Frans D Rahusen; Andre J A Bremers; Hans F J Fabry; A H M Taets van Amerongen; Rob P A Boom; S Meijer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Wire-guided excision of non-palpable breast cancer: determinants and correlations between radiologic and histologic margins and residual disease in re-excisions.

Authors:  A O Saarela; T J Rissanen; K M Lähteenmäki; Y Soini; K Haukipuro; O Kaarela; H O Kiviniemi
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Margin re-excision and local recurrence in invasive breast cancer: A cost analysis using a decision tree model.

Authors:  Shoko E Abe; Joshua S Hill; Yimei Han; Kendall Walsh; James T Symanowski; Lejla Hadzikadic-Gusic; Teresa Flippo-Morton; Terry Sarantou; Meghan Forster; Richard L White
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer: Update 2017.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Marc Thill; Christian Jackisch; Christoph Thomssen; Volkmar Müller; Wolfgang Janni; Wolfgang Janni
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  [Specimen radiography assessment of surgical margins status in subclinical breast carcinoma: a diagnostic study].

Authors:  C-J Fouché; F Tabareau; P Michenet; P Lebas; E-G Simon
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris)       Date:  2011-02-23

6.  Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Michael A Proschan
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.339

7.  Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact?

Authors:  Geneviève Soucy; Julie Bélanger; Guy Leblanc; Lucas Sideris; Pierre Drolet; Andrew Mitchell; Yves E Leclerc; Michel P Dufresne; Julie Beaudet; Pierre Dubé
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast cancers.

Authors:  Charlotte Ngô; Aymeric G Pollet; Juliette Laperrelle; Gregory Ackerman; Sandra Gomme; Fabienne Thibault; Virginie Fourchotte; Remy J Salmon
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Radioguided occult lesion localization versus wire-guided localization for non-palpable breast lesions: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Koray Ocal; Ahmet Dag; Ozgur Turkmenoglu; Emel Ceylan Gunay; Erdem Yucel; Meltem Nass Duce
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 10.  Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  1 in total

1.  Radiopaque tissue transfer and X-ray system versus standard specimen radiography for intraoperative margin assessment in breast-conserving surgery: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Angrit Stachs; Julia Bollmann; Annett Martin; Johannes Stubert; Toralf Reimer; Bernd Gerber; Steffi Hartmann
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-07-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.