| Literature DB >> 20300170 |
Abstract
International air travel has played a significant role in driving recent increases in the rates of biological invasion and spread of infectious diseases. By providing high speed, busy transport links between spatially distant, but climatically similar regions of the world, the worldwide airline network (WAN) increases the risks of deliberate or accidental movements and establishment of climatically sensitive exotic organisms. With traffic levels continuing to rise and climates changing regionally, these risks will vary, both seasonally and year-by-year. Here, detailed estimates of air traffic trends and climate changes for the period 2007-2010 are used to examine the likely directions and magnitudes of changes in climatically sensitive organism invasion risk across the WAN. Analysis of over 144 million flights from 2007-2010 shows that by 2010, the WAN is likely to change little overall in terms of connecting regions with similar climates, but anticipated increases in traffic and local variations in climatic changes should increase the risks of exotic species movement on the WAN and establishment in new areas. These overall shifts mask spatially and temporally heterogenous changes across the WAN, where, for example, traffic increases and climatic convergence by July 2010 between parts of China and northern Europe and North America raise the likelihood of exotic species invasions, whereas anticipated climatic shifts may actually reduce invasion risks into much of eastern Europe.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 20300170 PMCID: PMC2836027 DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05588.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecography ISSN: 0906-7590 Impact factor: 5.992
Figure 1Mean monthly CEDs and monthly total seat capacities across the WAN for 2007 and 2010.
Figure 2Percentage change in incoming seat capacities 2007–2010 at airports globally.
From the top 10% of routes by longest distance: (a) top 10 routes by CEDt for January, April, July and October 2007, (b) top 10 routes by CEDt for January, April, July and October 2010, (c) top 10 routes by largest difference between CEDt in 2007 and 2010 for January, April, July and October.
| Rank | January | April | July | October |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||
| 1 | Los Angeles (USA) – Shanghai (China) | Portland (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Montreal (Canada) – Paris (France) | Detroit (USA) – Osaka (Japan) |
| 2 | New York (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Seattle (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Toronto (Canada) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Detroit (USA) – Nagoya (Japan) |
| 3 | Seattle (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Seattle (USA) – Copenhagen (Denmark) | Montreal (Canada) – Munich (Germany) | Chicago (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 4 | New York (USA) – Zurich (Switzerland) | Seattle (USA) – Paris (France) | New York (USA) – Vienna (Austria) | Minneapolis (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 5 | Los Angeles (USA) – Amsterdam (Netherlands) | Seattle (USA) – London (UK) | Montreal (Canada) – London (UK) | Boston (USA) – Nagoya (Japan) |
| 6 | New York (USA) – Hamburg (Germany) | Johannesburg (S Africa) – Sydney (Australia) | Toronto (Canada) – Paris (France) | Boston (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 7 | Istanbul (Turkey) – Shanghai (China) | Chicago (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Ottawa (Canada) – London (UK) | New York (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 8 | Los Angeles (USA) – Taipei (Taiwan) | Washington DC (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) | Frankfurt (Germany) – Beijing (China) | Amsterdam (Netherlands) – Osaka (Japan) |
| 9 | New York (USA) – Geneva (Switzerland) | Portland (USA) – London (UK) | New York (USA) – Brussels (Belgium) | Houston (USA) – Delhi (India) |
| 10 | Toronto (Canada) – Zurich (Switzerland) | New York (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Toronto (Canada) – Dusseldorf (Germany) | Washington DC (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| (b) | ||||
| 1 | Los Angeles (USA) – Amsterdam (Netherlands) | Seattle (USA) – London (UK) | Montreal (Canada) – Munich (Germany) | Seattle (USA) – Seoul (Korea) |
| 2 | New York (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Portland (USA) – London (UK) | Montreal (Canada) – Paris (France) | Detroit (USA) – Osaka (Japan) |
| 3 | Istanbul (Turkey) – Shanghai (China) | Seattle (USA) – Copenhagen (Denmark) | Toronto (Canada) – Beijing (China) | Minneapolis (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 4 | Seattle (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Portland (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | New York (USA) – Vienna (Austria) | Detroit (USA) – Nagoya (Japan) |
| 5 | Los Angeles (USA) – Shanghai (China) | Washington (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) | New York (USA) – Beijing (China) | Chicago (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 6 | New York (USA) – Zurich (Switzerland) | Seattle (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Frankfurt (Germany) – Beijing (China) | Boston (USA) – Nagoya (Japan) |
| 7 | New York (USA) – Hamburg (Germany) | New York (USA) – Seoul (Korea) | Chicago (USA) – Beijing (China) | Boston (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 8 | New York (USA) – London (UK) | Chicago (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | Toronto (Canada) – Frankfurt (Germany) | New York (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 9 | Boston (USA) – Paris (France) | New York (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Montreal (Canada) – Prague (Czech Rep) | Amsterdam (Netherlands) – Osaka (Japan) |
| 10 | Chicago (USA) – Warsaw (Poland) | Chicago (USA) – Paris (France) | Chicago (USA) – Warsaw (Poland) | San Francisco (USA) – Shanghai (China) |
| (c) | ||||
| 1 | Los Angeles (USA) – Amsterdam (Netherlands) | Seattle (USA) – London (UK) | Montreal (Canada) – Munich (Germany) | Seattle (USA) – Seoul (Korea) |
| 2 | Istanbul (Turkey) – Shanghai (China) | New York (USA) – Seoul (Korea) | Toronto (Canada) – Beijing (China) | San Francisco (USA) – Shanghai (China) |
| 3 | Las Vegas (USA) – London (UK) | Portland (USA) – London (UK) | Toronto (Canada) – Seoul (Korea) | Minneapolis (USA) – Tokyo (Japan) |
| 4 | Rome (Italy) – Shanghai (China) | Chicago (USA) – Seoul (Korea) | New York (USA) – Beijing (China) | Atlanta (USA) – Rome (Italy) |
| 5 | Boston (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Los Angeles (USA) – Beijing (China) | Vancouver (Canada) – Amsterdam (Netherlands) | Detroit (USA) – Shanghai (China) |
| 6 | New York (USA) – Frankfurt (Germany) | London (UK) – Minneapolis (USA) | Munich (Germany) – Beijing (China) | Detroit (USA) – Osaka (Japan) |
| 7 | Chicago (USA) – Warsaw (Poland) | Atlanta (USA) – Singapore (Singapore) | Detroit (USA) – Beijing (China) | Philadelphia (USA) – Hong Kong (China) |
| 8 | Toronto (Canada) – Milan (Italy) | Detroit (USA) – Shanghai (China) | Chicago (USA) – Beijing (China) | New York (USA) – Seoul (Korea) |
| 9 | Salt Lake City (USA) – Milan (Italy) | Chicago (USA) – Warsaw (Poland) | Toronto (Canada) – Munich (Germany) | Istanbul (Turkey) – Shanghai (China) |
| 10 | New York (USA) – Prague (Czech Rep) | Munich (Germany) – Shanghai (China) | Chicago (USA) – Warsaw (Poland) | Chicago (USA) – Shanghai (China) |
Figure 3CSIt in 2007 for (a) January and (b) July. Percentage change in CSIt 2007–2010 for (c) January and (d) July. Results for April and October are presented in Supplementary Information.
Figure 4(a) Average per-seat incoming gross national income (GNI) in US$ for 2007, (b) percentage change in incoming average per-seat GNI 2007–2010.