Literature DB >> 20299513

Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study.

Sigurdur Y Kristinsson1, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Magnus Björkholm, Lynn R Goldin, Sam Schulman, Cecilie Blimark, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist, Anders Wahlin, Ingemar Turesson, Ola Landgren.   

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of venous thrombosis. Interestingly, excess risk of venous thromboembolism has been observed among patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Using population-based data from Sweden, we assessed the risks of venous and arterial thrombosis in 18,627 MM and 5326 MGUS patients diagnosed from 1958 to 2006, compared with 70,991 and 20,161 matched controls, respectively. At 1, 5, and 10 years after MM diagnosis, there was an increased risk of venous thrombosis: hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 7.5 (6.4-8.9), 4.6 (4.1-5.1), and 4.1 (3.8-4.5), respectively. The corresponding results for arterial thrombosis were 1.9 (1.8-2.1), 1.5 (1.4-1.6), and 1.5 (1.4-1.5). At 1, 5, and 10 years after MGUS diagnosis, hazard ratios were 3.4 (2.5-4.6), 2.1 (1.7-2.5), and 2.1 (1.8-2.4) for venous thrombosis. The corresponding risks for arterial thrombosis were 1.7 (1.5-1.9), 1.3 (1.2-1.4), and 1.3 (1.3-1.4). IgG/IgA (but not IgM) MGUS patients had increased risks for venous and arterial thrombosis. Risks for thrombosis did not vary by M-protein concentration (> 10.0 g/L or < 10.0 g/L) at diagnosis. MGUS patients with (vs without) thrombosis had no excess risk of MM or Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Our findings are of relevance for future studies and for improvement of thrombosis prophylaxis strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20299513      PMCID: PMC2890150          DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-252072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  44 in total

1.  Extended survival in advanced and refractory multiple myeloma after single-agent thalidomide: identification of prognostic factors in a phase 2 study of 169 patients.

Authors:  B Barlogie; R Desikan; P Eddlemon; T Spencer; J Zeldis; N Munshi; A Badros; M Zangari; E Anaissie; J Epstein; J Shaughnessy; D Ayers; D Spoon; G Tricot
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Lenalidomide and venous thrombosis in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert Knight; Robert J DeLap; Jerome B Zeldis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The role of aspirin in the prevention of thrombotic complications of thalidomide and anthracycline-based chemotherapy for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Rachid Baz; Liang Li; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Gordan Srkalovic; Bridget McGowan; Erin Yiannaki; Mary Ann Karam; Beth Faiman; Rony Abou Jawde; Steven Andresen; Jerome Zeldis; Mohamad A Hussein
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Combination therapy with thalidomide plus dexamethasone for newly diagnosed myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Suzanne Hayman; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Philip R Greipp; Susan Geyer; Nancy Iturria; Rafael Fonseca; John A Lust; Robert A Kyle; Thomas E Witzig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Hazard rate estimation under random censoring with varying kernels and bandwidths.

Authors:  H G Müller; J L Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors.

Authors:  J A Heit
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.824

7.  Thromboembolism in patients on thalidomide for myeloma.

Authors:  Stella J Bowcock; Saad M B Rassam; Sue M Ward; Jacky T Turner; Mike Laffan
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  Risk of lymphoproliferative disorders among first-degree relatives of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia patients: a population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Magnus Björkholm; Lynn R Goldin; Mary L McMaster; Ingemar Turesson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  The risk of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  S Sallah; A Husain; J Wan; P Vos; N P Nguyen
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  The relationship between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  Adam L Cohen; Rami Sarid
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 3.944

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  Approach to chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Peter Oppelt; Anthony Betbadal; Lalitha Nayak
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 2.  The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Antonio Palumbo; Hans Erik Johnsen; Monika Engelhardt; Francesca Gay; Henrik Gregersen; Roman Hajek; Martina Kleber; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Pellegrino Musto; Torben Plesner; Orhan Sezer; Evangelos Terpos; Anders Waage; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Henk M Lokhorst
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 3.  Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Complications Associated with Multiple Myeloma Therapies: Incidence, Pathophysiology, and Management.

Authors:  Vivek G Patel; Robert F Cornell
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma: is the evidence there?

Authors:  Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 6.  Precursors to lymphoproliferative malignancies.

Authors:  Lynn R Goldin; Mary L McMaster; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Family history of venous thromboembolism is associated with increased risk for thrombosis in multiple myeloma: a population-based study.

Authors:  S Y Kristinsson; L Goldin; I Turesson; M Hultcrantz; M Björkholm; O Landgren
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  The thromboprotective effect of bortezomib is dependent on the transcription factor Kruppel-like factor 2 (KLF2).

Authors:  Lalitha Nayak; Hong Shi; G Brandon Atkins; Zhiyong Lin; Alvin H Schmaier; Mukesh K Jain
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Predicting venous thromboembolism in multiple myeloma: development and validation of the IMPEDE VTE score.

Authors:  Kristen M Sanfilippo; Suhong Luo; Tzu-Fei Wang; Mark Fiala; Martin Schoen; Tanya M Wildes; Joseph Mikhael; Nicole M Kuderer; David C Calverley; Jesse Keller; Theodore Thomas; Kenneth R Carson; Brian F Gage
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 10.  What is the significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance?

Authors:  Catherine Atkin; Alex Richter; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.