Literature DB >> 19193398

The relationship between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and venous thromboembolic disease.

Adam L Cohen1, Rami Sarid.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been proposed to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). However, no series published to date has been population-based or included a control group with similar comorbidities to people with MGUS. PATIENTS/
METHODS: We reviewed the records of all the male veterans in a single VA healthcare system with MGUS between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2005. We compared the rate of VTE in 166 patients with MGUS with the rate of VTE in an age-matched control group of 465 patients who had tested negative for monoclonal gammopathy by serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP).
RESULTS: The VTE rate in the MGUS group was 2.2 per 100 person-years, which was not significantly different from the rate in the control group, 1.4 per 100 person-years (HR 1.38, CI 0.63-3.01, p=0.42). Most VTE events occurred within 4 months of the diagnosis of MGUS. In univariate analysis, albumin level (HR 0.21, CI 0.1-0.41, p<0.001), abnormal leukocyte count (HR 2.53, CI 1.09-5.86, p=0.03), and history of prior VTE (HR 4.41, CI 1.69-11.54, p=0.003) were associated with increased risk of VTE. On multivariate analysis, albumin level and history of prior VTE remained significant, but presence of MGUS was still not significantly associated with VTE risk.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the increased rate of VTE in people with MGUS may be primarily due to other underlying conditions that led to testing for a monoclonal gammopathy rather than to the monoclonal gammopathy itself. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19193398     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  7 in total

Review 1.  The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network.

Authors:  Niels W C J van de Donk; Antonio Palumbo; Hans Erik Johnsen; Monika Engelhardt; Francesca Gay; Henrik Gregersen; Roman Hajek; Martina Kleber; Heinz Ludwig; Gareth Morgan; Pellegrino Musto; Torben Plesner; Orhan Sezer; Evangelos Terpos; Anders Waage; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Pieter Sonneveld; Henk M Lokhorst
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Magnus Björkholm; Lynn R Goldin; Sam Schulman; Cecilie Blimark; Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Anders Wahlin; Ingemar Turesson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM).

Authors:  Robert A Kyle; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 4.  Precursors to lymphoproliferative malignancies.

Authors:  Lynn R Goldin; Mary L McMaster; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 5.  Thrombotic complications in multiple myeloma: a report of three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yonal Ipek; Hindilerden Fehmi; Besisik-Kalayoglu Sevgi; Sargin Deniz
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Cardiovascular Morbidity in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Danish Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Brian Schwartz; Morten Schou; Frederick L Ruberg; Dane Rucker; Jihoon Choi; Omar Siddiqi; Kevin Monahan; Lars Køber; Gunnar Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Charlotte Andersson
Journal:  JACC CardioOncol       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 7.  Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)-Not So Asymptomatic after All.

Authors:  Oliver C Lomas; Tarek H Mouhieddine; Sabrin Tahri; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.