Literature DB >> 2028496

Amphetamine promotes recovery from sensory-motor integration deficit after thrombotic infarction of the primary somatosensory rat cortex.

B E Hurwitz1, W D Dietrich, P M McCabe, O Alonso, B D Watson, M D Ginsberg, N Schneiderman.   

Abstract

The present studies were undertaken to examine 1) whether d-amphetamine sulfate administered to rats well after thrombotic infarction of the vibrissal cortical barrel-field within the primary somatosensory cortex affected the rate and completeness of behavioral recovery and 2) whether a dose-response relation exists between d-amphetamine sulfate dose and recovery of function. In a learning task requiring sensory-motor integration, 41 rats were trained to perform a motor response in a T-maze consequent to the detection of a vibrissal deflection cue. Once training was complete, unilateral (n = 29) or sham (n = 12) infarction was produced by a noninvasive photochemical technique. After infarction, T-maze performance was assessed repeatedly in rats receiving 2 (n = 10) or 4 (n = 10) mg/kg d-amphetamine sulfate or saline (n = 9) 24 hours prior to testing on days 4, 6, 9, and 11. The sham-operated control rats received d-amphetamine sulfate (n = 7) or no injections (n = 5). All three infarcted groups displayed a reliable and sustained behavioral deficit in performance that was not present in the sham-operated control animals. Although the performance of each infarcted group improved over the testing sessions after the first injection, the amphetamine-treated groups improved at a faster rate than the saline-injected group. The results further demonstrated a dose-response effect, with the 4 mg/kg amphetamine group recovering to within preinfarction levels 6-8 days earlier than the 2 mg/kg amphetamine and saline-injected groups. Moreover, both amphetamine-treated groups recovered more completely than the saline-injected group. Quantification of the chronic infarct area revealed no differences among the amphetamine-treated and saline-injected groups. These data provide further evidence of the facilitatory effect of d-amphetamine sulfate on recovery from brain injury and extend this effect to the enhancement of recovery subsequent to thrombotic infarction of the primary somatosensory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2028496     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.22.5.648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Present status and future possibilities of adjuvant pharmacotherapy for aphasia].

Authors:  C Korsukewitz; C Breitenstein; M Schomacher; S Knecht
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Cortical barrel lesions impair whisker-CS trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Roberto Galvez; Aldis P Weible; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Long-term survival and serial assessment of stroke damage and recovery - practical and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Michel Modo
Journal:  J Exp Stroke Transl Med       Date:  2009-01

4.  Amphetamine-enhanced motor training after cervical contusion injury.

Authors:  Laura Krisa; Kelly L Frederick; John C Canver; Scott K Stackhouse; Jed S Shumsky; Marion Murray
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Nogo receptor antagonism promotes stroke recovery by enhancing axonal plasticity.

Authors:  Jung-Kil Lee; Ji-Eun Kim; Michael Sivula; Stephen M Strittmatter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke.

Authors:  Binith Cheeran; Leonardo Cohen; Bruce Dobkin; Gary Ford; Richard Greenwood; David Howard; Masud Husain; Malcolm Macleod; Randolph Nudo; John Rothwell; Anthony Rudd; James Teo; Nicholas Ward; Steven Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 7.  The effects of amphetamine on recovery of function in animal models of cerebral injury: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Scott Barbay; Randolph J Nudo
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 8.  Drugs for stroke recovery: the example of amphetamines.

Authors:  Louise Martinsson; Staffan Eksborg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  GABAergic but not anti-cholinergic agents re-induce clinical deficits after stroke.

Authors:  Ronald M Lazar; Mitchell F Berman; Joanne R Festa; Allison E Geller; Teresa G Matejovsky; Randolph S Marshall
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.181

10.  Cardiac Arrest-Induced Global Brain Hypoxia-Ischemia during Development Affects Spontaneous Activity Organization in Rat Sensory and Motor Thalamocortical Circuits during Adulthood.

Authors:  Michael Shoykhet; Jason W Middleton
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.492

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.