Literature DB >> 2027480

Magnetic resonance imaging of the head in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a prospective 2-year follow-up with comparison of clinical evaluation, evoked potentials, oligoclonal banding, and CT.

K H Lee1, S A Hashimoto, J P Hooge, L F Kastrukoff, J J Oger, D K Li, D W Paty.   

Abstract

We previously compared the diagnostic capabilities of MRI of the head with CT, evoked potentials, and CSF oligoclonal banding (OB) analysis in a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with suspected multiple sclerosis (MS). To examine the ability of MRI and other paraclinical tests to predict the diagnosis of clinically definite MS (CDMS), we did a systematic clinical follow-up of 200 patients who were previously reported. In that study, 85 of 200 could be diagnosed as having laboratory-supported definite MS (LSDMS). In follow-up, we excluded one patient diagnosed as LSDMS who in retrospect was considered to have had CDMS at entry and 15 patients who were eventually diagnosed as having other diseases. After a mean follow-up of 2.1 years, 55 of the remaining 184 patients (30%) had developed CDMS. Thirty-eight of 84 patients with an original diagnosis of LSDMS (45%) and 17 of the remaining 100 patients with suspected MS (17%) had become CDMS. Forty-six of the 55 patients who developed CDMS in follow-up (84%) had an initial MRI that was strongly suggestive of MS. Fifty-two of those 55 CDMS patients (95%) had at least one MS-like abnormality on MRI when originally studied. In contrast, 38 of 55 (69%) had CSF OB, 38 of 55 (69%) had an abnormal VEP, 35 of 55 (64%) had an abnormal SEP, and 21 of 55 (38%) had an abnormal CT when first studied. MRI was the most sensitive single paraclinical test for predicting CDMS. CDMS developed during follow-up in 46 of the 94 patients (49%) whose initial MRI was strongly suggestive of MS.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027480     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  24 in total

1.  Lack of restriction of T cell receptor beta variable gene usage in cerebrospinal fluid lymphocytes in acute optic neuritis.

Authors:  R N Heard; S M Teutsch; B H Bennetts; S D Lee; E M Deane; G J Stewart
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Schmierer; L Niehaus; S Röricht; B U Meyer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Tintoré; A Rovira; M J Martínez; J Rio; P Díaz-Villoslada; L Brieva; C Borrás; E Grivé; J Capellades; X Montalban
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  EDMUS, a European database for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  C Confavreux; D A Compston; O R Hommes; W I McDonald; A J Thompson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 5.  [Differential diagnosis of chronic inflammatory diseases of the central nervous system. Cerebrospinal fluid diagnosis and immunological parameters].

Authors:  D Reske; H-F Petereit
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Isolated optic neuritis and its prognosis for multiple sclerosis: a clinical and paraclinical study with evoked potentials. CSF examination and brain MRI.

Authors:  A Ghezzi; V Torri; M Zaffaroni
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1996-10

7.  The effect of contrast reduction on pattern-reversal VEPs in suspected multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis.

Authors:  Adrian W Davidson; Richard F Scott; Keith W Mitchell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in probable multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G F Sau; I Aiello; S Siracusano; M Belgrano; M Pastorino; P Balsamo; I Magnano; G Rosati
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1997-10

9.  Prognostic value of MR and magnetization transfer imaging findings in patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis at presentation.

Authors:  G Iannucci; C Tortorella; M Rovaris; M P Sormani; G Comi; M Filippi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Sensitivities and predictive values of paraclinical tests for diagnosing multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Filippini; G C Comi; V Cosi; L Bevilacqua; M Ferrarini; V Martinelli; R Bergamaschi; M Filippi; A Citterio; L D'Incerti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.