Literature DB >> 2027097

On-site screening for urinary Hg concentrations and correlation with glomerular and renal tubular function.

C Naleway1, H N Chou, T Muller, J Dabney, D Roxe, F Siddiqui.   

Abstract

At the American Dental Association 1985 and 1986 Annual Sessions, an on-site screening for mercury was conducted as part of the Health Screening Program (HSP) to identify dentists having elevated urinary mercury concentrations. The data generated from this study were used to examine the relationship between elevated urinary mercury exposure and kidney dysfunction. Kidney dysfunction was assessed by measurement of serum and urine beta 2 microglobulin concentrations, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance. The mean values found for urinary mercury were 5.8 micrograms Hg/L and 7.6 micrograms Hg/L for 1985 and 1986, respectively. Urinary mercury concentrations for this population were found to fall within the range of not detected to 115 micrograms Hg/L. Of the total number of participants assayed in 1985 and 1986, roughly 10 percent of the sample exhibited elevated mercury concentrations above 20 micrograms Hg/L. An analysis of the clinical markers indicated no clear relationship between elevated urinary mercury concentrations and kidney dysfunction. In addition to mercury testing, all dentists who participated in the 1985 and 1986 HSP were issued a questionnaire soliciting information as to their professional exposure. Those participants who were identified as having elevated urinary mercury concentrations in the 1985 HSP were issued a followup questionnaire that addressed psychological and neuropsychological symptoms. From these questionnaires three significant relationships were found. These relationships were associated with mercury/amalgam handling and skin contact, the number of amalgams placed by the dentist, and the number of hours of practice per week. The reported absence of a clear relationship between urinary mercury concentrations and potential kidney dysfunction is in agreement with other findings at the mercury concentrations tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027097     DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1991.tb02169.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Dent        ISSN: 0022-4006            Impact factor:   1.821


  6 in total

1.  Case files of the Emory University Medical Toxicology Fellowship: inhalational mercury toxicity from a traditional Vietnamese product.

Authors:  Soumya L Pandalai; Brent W Morgan
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Mechanical Properties Comparing Composite Fiber Length to Amalgam.

Authors:  Richard C Petersen; Perng-Ru Liu
Journal:  J Compos       Date:  2016

3.  Exposures of dental professionals to elemental mercury and methylmercury.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Goodrich; Hwai-Nan Chou; Stephen E Gruninger; Alfred Franzblau; Niladri Basu
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.563

4.  The inhibition of mercury absorption by dietary ethanol in humans: cross-sectional and case-control studies.

Authors:  M D Martin; C Naleway
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Mercury derived from dental amalgams and neuropsychologic function.

Authors:  Pam Factor-Litvak; Gunnar Hasselgren; Diane Jacobs; Melissa Begg; Jennie Kline; Jamie Geier; Nancy Mervish; Sonia Schoenholtz; Joseph Graziano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Evaluation of mercury exposure level, clinical diagnosis and treatment for mercury intoxication.

Authors:  Byeong-Jin Ye; Byoung-Gwon Kim; Man-Joong Jeon; Se-Yeong Kim; Hawn-Cheol Kim; Tae-Won Jang; Hong-Jae Chae; Won-Jun Choi; Mi-Na Ha; Young-Seoub Hong
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-01-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.