M D Martin1, C Naleway. 1. Department of Oral Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA. mickeym@u.washington.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since the inhibition of mercury absorption by ethanol was serendipitously discovered in 1965,(1) a limited number of small number studies with both animal and human subjects have reported results consistent with this finding. AIMS: To investigate this phenomenon in a large scale human study with low level Hg exposed dentists. METHODS: Data were collected for a sample of 1171 dentists, and both cross sectional and case-control methods were utilised to examine the data. RESULTS: Abstainers (n = 345) had significantly higher urinary mercury concentrations (HgU) than drinkers (n = 826): 5.4 microg/l v 4.8 microg/l. Multiple linear regression showed a significant effect of ethanol dose on HgU after adjusting for potential confounders. A case-control analysis in which cases were defined as those individuals with urinary Hg concentrations of > or =15 microg/l (approximately top 5%), and controls as those with concentrations of <1.0 microg/l ( approximately bottom 5%), showed a clear protective dose-response relation; there was a decreasing risk of being a "case" (having an HgU > or =15 microg/l) with increasing ethanol consumption. The significance of the adjusted model is p<0.001, and the chi2 test for trend across ethanol consumption categories in the adjusted model is p<0.05, confirming the dose-response relation. CONCLUSION: We believe that this straightforward investigation provides the first specific confirmation in a large scale human study of the inhibitory effect of ethanol on urinary mercury concentration, and by inference, on mercury absorption.
BACKGROUND: Since the inhibition of mercury absorption by ethanol was serendipitously discovered in 1965,(1) a limited number of small number studies with both animal and human subjects have reported results consistent with this finding. AIMS: To investigate this phenomenon in a large scale human study with low level Hg exposed dentists. METHODS: Data were collected for a sample of 1171 dentists, and both cross sectional and case-control methods were utilised to examine the data. RESULTS: Abstainers (n = 345) had significantly higher urinary mercury concentrations (HgU) than drinkers (n = 826): 5.4 microg/l v 4.8 microg/l. Multiple linear regression showed a significant effect of ethanol dose on HgU after adjusting for potential confounders. A case-control analysis in which cases were defined as those individuals with urinary Hg concentrations of > or =15 microg/l (approximately top 5%), and controls as those with concentrations of <1.0 microg/l ( approximately bottom 5%), showed a clear protective dose-response relation; there was a decreasing risk of being a "case" (having an HgU > or =15 microg/l) with increasing ethanol consumption. The significance of the adjusted model is p<0.001, and the chi2 test for trend across ethanol consumption categories in the adjusted model is p<0.05, confirming the dose-response relation. CONCLUSION: We believe that this straightforward investigation provides the first specific confirmation in a large scale human study of the inhibitory effect of ethanol on urinary mercury concentration, and by inference, on mercury absorption.
Authors: John B Whitfield; Veronica Dy; Robert McQuilty; Gu Zhu; Andrew C Heath; Grant W Montgomery; Nicholas G Martin Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 9.031