Literature DB >> 20238202

[Incisional hernia - how do I do it? Standard surgical approach].

J Conze1, M Binnebösel, K Junge, V Schumpelick.   

Abstract

Various techniques for repair of an incisional hernia are available for the surgeon. Conventional suture techniques are quick and easy to perform but they are associated with an unacceptable rate of recurrence and therefore should only be used in exceptional cases. An underlying systemic disturbance of collagen metabolism is assumed to exist in patients with an incisional hernia. In such patients the mechanisms of wound healing and remodeling of the abdominal wall following laparotomy are insufficient, which necessitates reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a non-resorbable alloplastic mesh prosthesis to enable a long-term cure. The implantation of such meshes can be carried out laparoscopically or by an open approach. The gold standard of open repair techniques is the retromuscular placement of a mesh prosthesis. The retromuscular mesh placement as a reinforcement of the abdominal wall (augmentation) must be categorically differentiated into the abdominal wall replacement by mesh bridging. In this technique the mesh is likewise placed in the retromuscular space, however a complete closure of the ventral fascia is not necessary. Retromuscular augmentation enables an extra-peritoneal placement of the prosthesis, an optimization of tissue integration by plane coverage of the prosthesis by well vascularized muscular tissue and a sufficient overlap in cranio-caudal and lateral directions. Mesh fixation is best made with absorbable suture material but is better suited for technical simplification. The use of a prophylactic drainage should be decided depending on the individual patient's risk factors, because sufficient evidence-based data are currently not available. If augmentation is not possible bridging is necessary and then the mesh has to be fixed without underlying support. Current data reveal that the recurrence rate following incisional hernia repair by retromuscular mesh augmentation has decreased promisingly in comparison to simple suture techniques. In total the recurrence rate following retromuscular mesh placement ranges between 2 and 12%. Current results of prospective randomized multicentre trials are not available. However, it is to be expected that further development of mesh materials as well as improvement of surgical techniques with avoidance of typical pitfalls will lead to further reduction of the recurrence rate with an improvement in patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20238202     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1817-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  22 in total

Review 1.  The lightweight and large porous mesh concept for hernia repair.

Authors:  Bernd Klosterhalfen; Karsten Junge; Uwe Klinge
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Wound drains after incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

3.  Mesh for hernia repair.

Authors:  U Klinge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight composite mesh with polyester or polypropylene mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  J Conze; A N Kingsnorth; J B Flament; R Simmermacher; G Arlt; C Langer; E Schippers; M Hartley; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  "Components separation" method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study.

Authors:  O M Ramirez; E Ruas; A L Dellon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study.

Authors:  Y Cengiz; P Blomquist; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

7.  Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall.

Authors:  U Klinge; B Klosterhalfen; J Conze; W Limberg; B Obolenski; A P Ottinger; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1998-12

8.  Ventral rectus fascia closure on top of mesh hernia repair in the sublay technique.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Gabriele Henke; Leonore Zimmermann; Georg Aumann; Gunter Hellmich; Klaus Ludwig
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia.

Authors:  Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; S Smedberg; A Montgomery; P Nordin; L Spangen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Abdominal wall components separation method for closure of complicated abdominal hernias].

Authors:  D Pantelis; A Jafari; T O Vilz; N Schäfer; J C Kalff; M Kaminski
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Growth and trends in publications about abdominal wall hernias and the impact of a specific journal on herniology: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu; D Oztuna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Mesh fixation in open IPOM procedure with tackers or sutures? A randomized clinical trial with preliminary results.

Authors:  M R Langenbach; D Enz
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Mesh biocompatibility: effects of cellular inflammation and tissue remodelling.

Authors:  Karsten Junge; Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Raphael Rosch; Uwe Klinge; Ulf P Neumann; Petra Lynen Jansen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Marcel Binnebösel; Klaus T von Trotha; Petra Lynen Jansen; Joachim Conze; Ulf P Neumann; Karsten Junge
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 9.623

6.  Prevention of subcutaneous seroma formation in open ventral hernia repair using a new low-thrombin fibrin sealant.

Authors:  Gernot Köhler; Oliver Owen Koch; Stavros A Antoniou; Michael Lechner; Franz Mayer; Klaus Emmanuel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Abdominal wall integrity after open abdomen: long-term results of vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction (VAWCM).

Authors:  A Willms; S Schaaf; R Schwab; I Richardsen; D Bieler; B Wagner; C Güsgen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Current Status of Hernia Centres Around the Globe.

Authors:  Hakan Kulacoglu; Derya Oztuna
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use.

Authors:  L D'Amore; F Ceci; S Mattia; M Fabbi; P Negro; F Gossetti
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  [Use of biological meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Results of a survey in Germany].

Authors:  G Woeste; F-E Isemer; C W Strey; H-M Schardey; H Thielemann; A Mihaljevic; J Kleeff; J Kleef
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.