Stefan Vegter1, Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg. 1. Unit of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics (PE), Department of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. s.vegter@rug.nl
Abstract
AIMS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are frequently prescribed for various cardiovascular and renal diseases. A common side-effect of these drugs is a persistent dry cough. Physicians who fail to recognize a dry cough to be ACEi-related may attempt to treat it with antitussive agents instead of recommended ACEi substitution. Prescription behaviour in the general population considering treatment of the side-effect with antitussive agents has not been studied before. METHODS: Drug dispensing data between 2000 and 2007 were retrieved from the IADB.nl database. A prescription sequence symmetry analysis was used to determine whether antitussive agents were prescribed more often following ACEi initiation than the other way around. A logistic regression model was fitted to determine predictors. RESULTS: We identified 27 446 incident users of ACEi therapy. One thousand and fifty-four patients were incident users of both ACEi and antitussives within a half-year time span. There was an excess of patients being prescribed antitussive agents after ACEi initiation (703 vs. 351), adjusted sequence ratio 2.2 [confidence interval (CI) 1.9, 2.4]. Female patients were more likely to be prescribed antitussive agents following ACEi therapy initiation, odds ratio 1.4 (CI 1.1, 1.9), age and co-medications were not significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant and clinically relevant excess of patients receiving antitussives after ACEi initiation. The results suggest that cough as a side-effect of ACEi is not recognized as being ACEi-related or is symptomatically treated with antitussive agents instead of ACEi substitution. The estimated frequency of antitussive treatment of ACEi-induced dry cough is 15%.
AIMS: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are frequently prescribed for various cardiovascular and renal diseases. A common side-effect of these drugs is a persistent dry cough. Physicians who fail to recognize a dry cough to be ACEi-related may attempt to treat it with antitussive agents instead of recommended ACEi substitution. Prescription behaviour in the general population considering treatment of the side-effect with antitussive agents has not been studied before. METHODS: Drug dispensing data between 2000 and 2007 were retrieved from the IADB.nl database. A prescription sequence symmetry analysis was used to determine whether antitussive agents were prescribed more often following ACEi initiation than the other way around. A logistic regression model was fitted to determine predictors. RESULTS: We identified 27 446 incident users of ACEi therapy. One thousand and fifty-four patients were incident users of both ACEi and antitussives within a half-year time span. There was an excess of patients being prescribed antitussive agents after ACEi initiation (703 vs. 351), adjusted sequence ratio 2.2 [confidence interval (CI) 1.9, 2.4]. Female patients were more likely to be prescribed antitussive agents following ACEi therapy initiation, odds ratio 1.4 (CI 1.1, 1.9), age and co-medications were not significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant and clinically relevant excess of patients receiving antitussives after ACEi initiation. The results suggest that cough as a side-effect of ACEi is not recognized as being ACEi-related or is symptomatically treated with antitussive agents instead of ACEi substitution. The estimated frequency of antitussive treatment of ACEi-induced dry cough is 15%.
Authors: Eric Schirm; Taco B M Monster; Robin de Vries; Paul B van den Berg; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Hilde Tobi Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: P Ruggenenti; A Perna; G Gherardi; G Garini; C Zoccali; M Salvadori; F Scolari; F P Schena; G Remuzzi Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-07-31 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Seyed H Mahmoudpour; Abirami Veluchamy; Moneeza K Siddiqui; Folkert W Asselbergs; Patrick C Souverein; Catherine E de Keyser; Albert Hofman; Chim C Lang; Alexander S F Doney; Bruno H Stricker; Anthonius de Boer; Anke H Maitland-van der Zee; Colin N A Palmer Journal: Pharmacogenet Genomics Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Scott M Vouri; Earl J Morris; Silken A Usmani; Rachel Reise; Xinyi Jiang; Carl J Pepine; Todd M Manini; Daniel C Malone; Almut G Winterstein Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2021-10-06 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Stefan Vegter; Pieter de Boer; Klaas Willem van Dijk; Sipke Visser; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.606