Scott M Vouri1,2,3,4, Earl J Morris1, Silken A Usmani1,3, Rachel Reise1,3, Xinyi Jiang1, Carl J Pepine5, Todd M Manini2,4, Daniel C Malone6, Almut G Winterstein1,2,7. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 2. Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 3. University of Florida Health Physicians, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 4. Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 5. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. 6. Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 7. Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption regarding balance between marker drug (i.e., medication used to treat a drug-induced adverse event) initiation rates before and after initiation of an index drug (i.e., medication that is potentially associated with the drug-induced adverse event) in the absence of prescribing cascades, we used a well-described example of loop diuretic initiation to treat dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH CCB)-induced edema. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository from June 2011 and July 2018 was used to assess temporal prescribing of DH CCB and loop diuretics within the prescription sequence symmetry analysis framework. Validation of the prescribing cascade was performed via clinical expert chart review. RESULTS: Among patients without heart failure who were initiated on DH CCB, 26 and 64 loop diuretics initiators started within 360 days before versus after DH CCB initiation, respectively, resulting in an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) of 2.27 (95% CI, 1.44-3.58). Overall, 35 (54.7%) patients were determined to have a prescribing cascade. Removing patients who experienced a prescribing cascade resulted in an aSR of 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.78). CONCLUSION: Loop diuretic initiation rates before and after DH CCB initiation for reasons other a prescribing cascade were similar, thus confirming the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption regarding balance between marker drug (i.e., medication used to treat a drug-induced adverse event) initiation rates before and after initiation of an index drug (i.e., medication that is potentially associated with the drug-induced adverse event) in the absence of prescribing cascades, we used a well-described example of loop diuretic initiation to treat dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH CCB)-induced edema. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The University of Florida Health Integrated Data Repository from June 2011 and July 2018 was used to assess temporal prescribing of DH CCB and loop diuretics within the prescription sequence symmetry analysis framework. Validation of the prescribing cascade was performed via clinical expert chart review. RESULTS: Among patients without heart failure who were initiated on DH CCB, 26 and 64 loop diuretics initiators started within 360 days before versus after DH CCB initiation, respectively, resulting in an adjusted sequence ratio (aSR) of 2.27 (95% CI, 1.44-3.58). Overall, 35 (54.7%) patients were determined to have a prescribing cascade. Removing patients who experienced a prescribing cascade resulted in an aSR of 1.05, 95% CI 0.62-1.78). CONCLUSION: Loop diuretic initiation rates before and after DH CCB initiation for reasons other a prescribing cascade were similar, thus confirming the prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption.
Authors: Lisa M Kalisch Ellett; Nicole L Pratt; John D Barratt; Debra Rowett; Elizabeth E Roughead Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: C A Naranjo; U Busto; E M Sellers; P Sandor; I Ruiz; E A Roberts; E Janecek; C Domecq; D J Greenblatt Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1981-08 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Rachel D Savage; Jessica D Visentin; Susan E Bronskill; Xuesong Wang; Andrea Gruneir; Vasily Giannakeas; Jun Guan; Kenneth Lam; Miles J Luke; Stephanie H Read; Nathan M Stall; Wei Wu; Lynn Zhu; Paula A Rochon; Lisa M McCarthy Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Scott Martin Vouri; Xinyi Jiang; Earl J Morris; Babette A Brumback; Almut G Winterstein Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Suzanne M Cadarette; Malcolm Maclure; J A Chris Delaney; Heather J Whitaker; Kaleen N Hayes; Shirley V Wang; Mina Tadrous; Joshua J Gagne; Giulia P Consiglio; Jesper Hallas Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Ann S Doherty; Faiza Shahid; Frank Moriarty; Fiona Boland; Barbara Clyne; Tobias Dreischulte; Tom Fahey; Seán P Kennelly; Emma Wallace Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2022-10