Literature DB >> 20232937

Sequence-dependent Kink-and-Slide deformations of nucleosomal DNA facilitated by histone arginines bound in the minor groove.

Difei Wang1, Nikolai B Ulyanov, Victor B Zhurkin.   

Abstract

In addition to bending and twisting deformabilities, the lateral displacements of the DNA axis (Kink-and-Slide) play an important role in DNA wrapping around the histone core (M. Y. Tolstorukov, A. V. Colasanti, D. M. McCandlish, W. K. Olson, V. B. Zhurkin, J. Mol. Biol. 371, 725-738 (2007)). Here, we show that these Kink-and-Slide deformations are likely to be stabilized by the arginine residues of histones interacting with the minor groove of DNA. The arginines are positioned asymmetrically in the minor groove, being closer to one strand. The asymmetric arginine-DNA interactions facilitate lateral displacement of base pairs across the DNA grooves, thus leading to a stepwise accumulation of the superhelical pitch of nucleosomal DNA. To understand the sequence dependence of such Kink-and-Slide deformations, we performed all-atom calculations of DNA hexamers with the YR and RY steps in the center. We found that when the unrestrained DNA deformations are allowed, the YR steps tend to bend into the major groove, and RY steps bend into the minor groove. However, when the nucleosomal Kink-and-Slide deformation is considered, the YR steps prove to be more favorable for bending into the minor groove. Overall, the Kink-and-Slide deformation energy of DNA increases in the order TA < CA < CG < GC < AC < AT. We propose a simple stereochemical model accounting for this sequence dependence. Our results agree with experimental data indicating that the TA step most frequently occurs in the minor-groove kink positions in the most stable nucleosomes. Our computations demonstrate that the Kink-and-Slide distortion is accompanied by the BI to BII transition. This fact, together with irregularities in the two-dimensional (Roll, Slide) energy contour maps, suggest that the Kink-and-Slide deformations represent a nonharmonic behavior of the duplex. This explains the difference between the two estimates of the DNA deformation energy in nucleosome - the earlier one made using knowledge-based elastic energy functions, and the current one based on all-atom calculations. Our findings are useful for refining the score functions for the prediction of nucleosome positioning. In addition, the reverse bending behavior of the YR and RY steps revealed under the Kink-and-Slide constraint is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms of binding transcription factors (such as p53) to DNA exposed on the surface of nucleosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232937      PMCID: PMC2987563          DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2010.10508586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn        ISSN: 0739-1102


  46 in total

1.  Asymmetries in the nucleosome core particle at 2.5 A resolution.

Authors:  J M Harp; B L Hanson; D E Timm; G J Bunick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-12

2.  Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences.

Authors:  A Thåström; P T Lowary; H R Widlund; H Cao; M Kubista; J Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Structure and dynamic behavior of nucleosomes.

Authors:  Karolin Luger
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.578

4.  A novel roll-and-slide mechanism of DNA folding in chromatin: implications for nucleosome positioning.

Authors:  Michael Y Tolstorukov; Andrew V Colasanti; David M McCandlish; Wilma K Olson; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Transcription factor access to chromatin.

Authors:  M Beato; K Eisfeld
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.

Authors:  K Luger; A W Mäder; R K Richmond; D F Sargent; T J Richmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Anisotropic flexibility of DNA and the nucleosomal structure.

Authors:  V B Zhurkin; Y P Lysov; V I Ivanov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Sequence-dependent anisotropic flexibility of B-DNA. A conformational study.

Authors:  N B Ulyanov; V B Zhurkin
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1984-10

9.  Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG.

Authors:  A V Fratini; M L Kopka; H R Drew; R E Dickerson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-12-25       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition.

Authors:  Remo Rohs; Sean M West; Alona Sosinsky; Peng Liu; Richard S Mann; Barry Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  15 in total

1.  Functional specificity of a protein-DNA complex mediated by two arginines bound to the minor groove.

Authors:  Jesús Mendieta; Laura Pérez-Lago; Margarita Salas; Ana Camacho
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Histone Sprocket Arginine Residues Are Important for Gene Expression, DNA Repair, and Cell Viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amelia J Hodges; Isaura J Gallegos; Marian F Laughery; Rithy Meas; Linh Tran; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Can nucleosomal DNA be described by an elastic model?: comment on "Sequence-dependent collective properties of DNAs and their role in biological systems" by Pasquale De Santis and Anita Scipioni.

Authors:  Victor B Zhurkin; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Working the kinks out of nucleosomal DNA.

Authors:  Wilma K Olson; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Nucleosome adaptability conferred by sequence and structural variations in histone H2A-H2B dimers.

Authors:  Alexey K Shaytan; David Landsman; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 6.  A brief review of nucleosome structure.

Authors:  Amber R Cutter; Jeffrey J Hayes
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Dynamics of the nucleosomal histone H3 N-terminal tail revealed by high precision single-molecule FRET.

Authors:  Kathrin Lehmann; Suren Felekyan; Ralf Kühnemuth; Mykola Dimura; Katalin Tóth; Claus A M Seidel; Jörg Langowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Codons support the maintenance of intrinsic DNA polymer flexibility over evolutionary timescales.

Authors:  G A Babbitt; K V Schulze
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Transcriptional activation of yeast genes disrupts intragenic nucleosome phasing.

Authors:  Feng Cui; Hope A Cole; David J Clark; Victor B Zhurkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An ensemble of B-DNA dinucleotide geometries lead to characteristic nucleosomal DNA structure and provide plasticity required for gene expression.

Authors:  Arvind Marathe; Manju Bansal
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2011-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.