Literature DB >> 20232605

Satisfaction with a weight loss program: what matters?

Jeffrey J VanWormer1, Anna M Martinez, Dan Cosentino, Nicolaas P Pronk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Satisfaction is understudied in weight loss programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between participant/program experiences and satisfaction with a weight loss intervention.
DESIGN: A prospective cohort design was utilized.
SETTING: The study was conducted in the Minneapolis metro area. SAMPLE: Participants were obese employees of a managed care organization. One hundred were enrolled, and 78 had complete data available. INTERVENTION: Treatment included telephone counseling along with a home telemonitoring scale and instructions to self-weigh daily. MEASURES: Outcomes included overall program satisfaction and willingness to refer the program to others. Predictors included demographics, treatment group, participation in other programs, expected weight, general health, body mass index, diet quality, physical activity, body image, mental health, counseling, and self-weighing. ANALYSIS: Quantitative predictor-outcome associations were examined using multiple logistic regressions. Qualitative satisfaction responses were analyzed using a general inductive approach.
RESULTS: Weight loss (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, p = .008), improved diet (OR = 1.27, p = .092), increased physical activity (OR = 1.05, p = .034), and improved body image (OR = 1.38, p = .051) were independent predictors of overall satisfaction. Treatment group (OR = 14.83, p = .015) and number of counseling calls (OR = 1.49, p = .009) were predictors of willingness to refer the program. Qualitative themes indicated desire to integrate counseling on emotional issues.
CONCLUSION: Health progress explained overall satisfaction, whereas treatment characteristics explained willingness to endorse the intervention. Concentrating on these factors may improve retention. Limitations included self-reported measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20232605     DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.080613-QUAN-92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  16 in total

1.  Preventing weight gain in African American breast cancer survivors using smart scales and activity trackers: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Carmina G Valle; Allison M Deal; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  The EARLY trials: a consortium of studies targeting weight control in young adults.

Authors:  Leslie A Lytle; Laura P Svetkey; Kevin Patrick; Steven H Belle; I Diana Fernandez; John M Jakicic; Karen C Johnson; Christine M Olson; Deborah F Tate; Rena Wing; Catherine M Loria
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Perioperative Online Weight Monitoring in Bariatric Surgery with a Digital Internet-Connected Scale.

Authors:  Mark Tenhagen; Gabriëlle H van Ramshorst; Ahmet Demirkiran; Michiel A J M Hunfeld; Huib A Cense
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  How feedback biases give ineffective medical treatments a good reputation.

Authors:  Mícheál de Barra; Kimmo Eriksson; Pontus Strimling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  A randomized trial testing the efficacy of a novel approach to weight loss among men with overweight and obesity.

Authors:  Melissa M Crane; Lesley D Lutes; Dianne S Ward; J Michael Bowling; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Physiological and Psychological Changes Following Liposuction of Large Volumes of Fat in Overweight and Obese Women.

Authors:  Allan Geliebter; Emily Krawitz; Tatiana Ungredda; Ella Peresechenski; Sharon Y Giese
Journal:  J Diabetes Obes       Date:  2015-12-09

7.  Relationship between Body Image and Body Weight Control in Overweight ≥55-Year-Old Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cristina Bouzas; Maria Del Mar Bibiloni; Josep A Tur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  What is the psychological impact of self-weighing? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yael Benn; Thomas L Webb; Betty P I Chang; Benjamin Harkin
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-02-09

9.  Perceived helpfulness of the individual components of a behavioural weight loss program: results from the Hopkins POWER Trial.

Authors:  A T Dalcin; G J Jerome; S L Fitzpatrick; T A Louis; N-Y Wang; W L Bennett; N Durkin; J M Clark; G L Daumit; L J Appel; J W Coughlin
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2015-09-09

10.  A gender- and culturally-sensitive weight loss intervention for Hispanic males: The ANIMO randomized controlled trial pilot study protocol and recruitment methods.

Authors:  David O Garcia; Luis A Valdez; Melanie L Bell; Kyle Humphrey; Melanie Hingle; Marylyn McEwen; Steven P Hooker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.