Literature DB >> 20231787

Physical therapy treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Christy C Tomkins1, Katherine H Dimoff, Holly S Forman, Emily S Gordon, Jennifer McPhail, Joyce R Wong, Michele C Battié.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Given the dearth of high quality research on conservative treatment for spinal stenosis, an empirical understanding of the scope of physical therapy provided in the community can help focus research and build standards of care.
OBJECTIVES: Provide preliminary insight into current physical therapy practice in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), from both patient and physical therapist perspectives.
METHODS: Patients greater than 50 years of age with LSS diagnosed by a spine surgeon were recruited to participate in a telephone survey regarding treatment. Physical therapists were recruited to complete a survey regarding treatments offered to patients with LSS.
RESULTS: Of the patients participating in the study (n=75), 44 (59%) reported receiving physical therapy treatment. Treatments most frequently reported by patients were massage (27%), strengthening exercises (23%), flexibility exercises (18%), and heat/ice (14%). The most frequently advocated treatments by the 76 physical therapists included flexibility (87%), stabilization (86%) and strengthening exercises (83%), followed by heat/ice (76%), acupuncture (63%) and joint mobilization (62%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results can guide both clinical research priorities and standards of care for physical therapy treatments of LSS. Based on the results of this study, future research foci should include massage, flexibility and strengthening exercises, stabilization techniques and heat/ice treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20231787     DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2010-0245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-8127            Impact factor:   1.398


  8 in total

Review 1.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

Review 2.  Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Luciana Gazzi Macedo; Abraham Hum; Laura Kuleba; Joey Mo; Linda Truong; Mankeen Yeung; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-07-25

3.  Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Ville Leinonen; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Tapani Saari; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally Invasive Decompression and Physiotherapy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Haydn Hoffman; Shelley S Bennett; Charles H Li; Piia Haakana; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-06-11

5.  Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua Zadro; Mary O'Keeffe; Christopher Maher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Relationship between changes in physical function parameters and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score after decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Hiroto Takenaka; Hideshi Sugiura; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Kasuri Nishihama; Atsuki Ito; Junya Suzuki; Morio Kawamura; Shuntaro Hanamura
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 0.794

Review 7.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Eugene Carragee; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

8.  Understanding the mechanisms of a combined physical and psychological intervention for people with neurogenic claudication: protocol for a causal mediation analysis of the BOOST trial.

Authors:  Christine Comer; Hopin Lee; Esther Williamson; Sarah Lamb
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.