Literature DB >> 20230386

The prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) urine test in men with previous negative biopsies: does free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio influence the performance of the PCA3 score in predicting positive biopsies?

Guillaume Ploussard1, Alexander Haese, Hendrik Van Poppel, Michael Marberger, Arnulf Stenzl, Peter F A Mulders, Hartwig Huland, Laurence Bastien, Clèment-Claude Abbou, Mesut Remzi, Martina Tinzl, Susan Feyerabend, Alexander B Stillebroer, Martijn P M Q Van Gils, Jack A Schalken, Alexandre de La Taille.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to determine the performance characteristics of the prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) score on the outcome of biopsy relative to different ranges of free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (f/tPSA) in men with a previous negative biopsy and a PSA level of 2.5-10 ng/mL, as urine tests like PCA3 are currently under investigation in order to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and to decrease the rate of unnecessary rebiopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: data from the previous prospective European multicentre study were reviewed. Only patients with a PSA level of 2.5-10 ng/mL were included in the present study. In all, 301 patients had complete data. The diagnostic accuracy of the PCA3 score for predicting a positive biopsy outcome was studied using sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values. The PCA3 performance was evaluated relative to three different subgroups of f/tPSA, as follows: >20% (group 1), 10-20% (group 2) and <10% (group 3).
RESULTS: the prostate cancer detection rates were 18.8%, 23.9% and 34.8% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the PCA3 score, total PSA and f/tPSA was 0.688, 0.553 and 0.571, respectively. The percentage of men with positive biopsies was 30.6%, 37.0% and 44.4% in those with a PCA3 score of >30, vs 10.3%, 15.5% and 28.6% when the PCA3 score was <30, in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The difference was significant only in groups 1 and 2. In men with a f/tPSA of ≤ 10% the difference in detection rates relative to the PCA3 score was not statistically significant regardless of which PCA3 threshold was used. A high PCA3 score was significantly associated with age, clinical T2 stage and positive biopsy (P < 0.001, 0.013 and <0.001, respectively). In bivariate analysis accounting for the PCA3 score and the f/tPSA, a PCA3 score of >30 was a significant independent predictor of positive biopsies (odds ratio 3.01; 95% confidence interval 1.74-5.23; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PCA3 remained a better predictor of prostate cancer than f/tPSA. In men with a f/tPSA of >10%, the use of the PCA3 score was highly correlated with the risk of having cancer on re-biopsy, and could prevent unnecessary prostate biopsies if the value is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230386     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09286.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of GSTP1 and APC methylation as indicators for repeat biopsy in a high-risk cohort of men with negative initial prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Michelle J Brotzman; Leslie A Mangold; Joseph W Bigley; Jonathan I Epstein; David McLeod; Eric A Klein; J Stephen Jones; Songbai Wang; Theresa McAskill; Jyoti Mehrotra; Bhargavi Raghavan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of the PCA3 urine test.

Authors:  George Leighton Lee; Albert Dobi; Shiv Srivastava
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  [Prostate biopsy. Update for indication, procedure, and future developments].

Authors:  S Machtens; A Roosen; C G Stief; M C Truß
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Noncoding RNAs in endocrine malignancy.

Authors:  Jessica Kentwell; Justin S Gundara; Stan B Sidhu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-09

5.  Assessment of long-term outcomes associated with urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion at repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Scott A Tomlins; Christine L Barnett; Todd M Morgan; James E Montie; John T Wei; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prostate cancer: improvements in risk stratification of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gurdarshan S Sandhu; Gerald L Andriole
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  PCA3 in the detection and management of early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xavier Filella; Laura Foj; Montserrat Milà; Josep M Augé; Rafael Molina; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-03-16

8.  Long noncoding RNAs as putative biomarkers for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Bongyong Lee; Joseph Mazar; Muhammad N Aftab; Feng Qi; John Shelley; Jian-Liang Li; Subramaniam Govindarajan; Felipe Valerio; Inoel Rivera; Tadzia Thurn; Tien Anh Tran; Darian Kameh; Vipul Patel; Ranjan J Perera
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 9.  Toward the detection of prostate cancer in urine: a critical analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; David F Jarrard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 7.600

Review 10.  Potential Approaches and Recent Advances in Biomarker Discovery in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Weronika Majer; Katarzyna Kluzek; Hans Bluyssen; Joanna Wesoły
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.