Literature DB >> 20230143

The effects of age in four alternative forced-choice item and associative recognition tasks.

Meredith M Patterson1, Christopher Hertzog.   

Abstract

Seventy-three young and 84 older adults were taught interactive imagery as a strategy for learning word pairs. In the control condition, participants viewed word pairs 1 at a time and formed an interactive image for each. In the experimental condition, participants first formed individual mental images for both the cue and the target and then formed an interactive image for the pair. Participants in both conditions then completed 4 alternative forced-choice item and associative recognition tasks that avoid influences of age differences in retrieval strategies such as recall-to-reject. Unlike findings with typical yes-no recognition tests, associative recognition was superior to item recognition in the control condition. This effect was attenuated in the experimental condition. Older adults had poorer recognition memory for both associative and item tests, with a larger age difference for recognizing new associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20230143      PMCID: PMC2841315          DOI: 10.1037/a0016046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  14 in total

1.  The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-12

2.  The associative memory deficit of older adults: further support using face-name associations.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Jonathan Guez; Angela Kilb; Sarah Reedy
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-09

3.  Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leah L Light; Meredith M Patterson; Christie Chung; Michael R Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-10

4.  Aging neuromodulation impairs associative binding: a neurocomputational account.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Li; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-06

5.  Associative and strategic components of episodic memory: a life-span dissociation.

Authors:  Yee Lee Shing; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Shu-Chen Li; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-08

6.  Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics.

Authors:  Michael R Healy; Leah L Light; Christie Chung
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Use of relational and item-specific information in remembering by older and younger adults.

Authors:  M A Luszcz; T H Roberts; J Mattiske
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1990-06

8.  Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.

Authors:  B L Chalfonte; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

9.  Adult age differences in memory performance: tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Zahra Hussain; Jonathan Guez; Maoz Bar-On
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  4 in total

1.  Do age-related differences in episodic feeling of knowing accuracy depend on the timing of the judgement?

Authors:  Stephanie N Maclaverty; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-11

2.  Multielement Episodic Encoding in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Taylor James; M Natasha Rajah; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Age invariance in semantic and episodic metamemory: both younger and older adults provide accurate feeling-of-knowing for names of faces.

Authors:  Deborah K Eakin; Christopher Hertzog; William Harris
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-03-28

4.  Artificial neural networks reveal individual differences in metacognitive monitoring of memory.

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Matthew G Wisniewski; Helen L Williams; Jane M Berry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.