Literature DB >> 20229874

Dosimetric accuracy of a deterministic radiation transport based 192Ir brachytherapy treatment planning system. Part I: single sources and bounded homogeneous geometries.

K Zourari1, E Pantelis, A Moutsatsos, L Petrokokkinos, P Karaiskos, L Sakelliou, E Georgiou, P Papagiannis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to validate a deterministic radiation transport based treatment planning system (TPS) for single 192Ir brachytherapy source dosimetry in homogeneous water geometries.
METHODS: TPS results were obtained using the deterministic radiation transport option of a BRACHYVISION v. 8.8 system for three characteristic source designs (VS2000, GMPlus HDR, and GMPlus PDR) with each source either centered in a 15 cm radius spherical water phantom, or positioned at varying distance away from the phantom center. Corresponding MC simulations were performed using the MCNPX code v.2.5.0 and source geometry models prepared using information provided by the manufacturers.
RESULTS: Comparison in terms of the AAPM TG-43 dosimetric formalism quantities, as well as dose rate distributions per unit air kerma strength with a spatial resolution of 0.1 cm, yielded close agreement between TPS and MC results for the sources centered in the phantom. Besides some regions close to the source longitudinal axes where discrepancies could be characterized as systematic, overall agreement for all three sources studied is comparable to the statistical (type A) uncertainty of MC simulations (1% at the majority of points in the geometry increasing to 2%-3% at points lying both away from the source center and close to the source longitudinal axis). A corresponding good agreement was also found between TPS and MC results for the sources positioned away from the phantom center.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of this work attest the capability of the TPS to accurately account for the scatter conditions regardless of the size or shape of a given geometry of dosimetric interest, and the position of a source within it. This is important since, as shown in the literature and summarized also in this work, these factors could introduce a significant dosimetric effect that is currently ignored in clinical treatment planning. It is concluded that the implementation of the deterministic radiation transport option of the BRACHYVISION v. 8.8 system for 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry in homogeneous water geometries yields results of comparable accuracy to the golden standard of Monte Carlo simulation, in clinically viable calculation times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20229874     DOI: 10.1118/1.3290630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  11 in total

1.  Current state of the art brachytherapy treatment planning dosimetry algorithms.

Authors:  P Papagiannis; E Pantelis; P Karaiskos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Impact of heterogeneity-based dose calculation using a deterministic grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for intracavitary brachytherapy.

Authors:  Justin K Mikell; Ann H Klopp; Graciela M N Gonzalez; Kelly D Kisling; Michael J Price; Paula A Berner; Patricia J Eifel; Firas Mourtada
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Fast patient-specific Monte Carlo brachytherapy dose calculations via the correlated sampling variance reduction technique.

Authors:  Andrew Sampson; Yi Le; Jeffrey F Williamson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dosimetric comparison of Acuros™ BV with AAPM TG43 dose calculation formalism in breast interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy with the use of metal catheters.

Authors:  Mourougan Sinnatamby; Vivekanandan Nagarajan; Sathyanarayana Reddy K; Gunaseelan Karunanidhi; Vivekanandam Singhavajala
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2015-09-14

5.  BrachyGuide: a brachytherapy-dedicated DICOM RT viewer and interface to Monte Carlo simulation software.

Authors:  Evaggelos Pantelis; Vassiliki Peppa; Vasileios Lahanas; Eleftherios Pappas; Panagiotis Papagiannis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Impact of GBBS algorithm on post-mastectomy scar boost irradiation of breast using catheter flap.

Authors:  Mourougan Sinnatamby; Vijayaprabhu Neelakandan; Gunaseelan Karunanidhi; Saravanan Kandasamy; Seenisamy Ramapandian; Muniyappan Kannan; Elakiya Sampath
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2021-05-24

7.  Physics-aspects of dose accuracy in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy: source dosimetry, treatment planning, equipment performance and in vivo verification techniques.

Authors:  Antony Palmer; David Bradley; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30

8.  Head and neck (192)Ir HDR-brachytherapy dosimetry using a grid-based Boltzmann solver.

Authors:  Frank-André Siebert; Sabine Wolf; George Kóvacs
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-12-18

9.  Impact of heterogeneity-corrected dose calculation using a grid-based Boltzmann solver on breast and cervix cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Julia Hofbauer; Christian Kirisits; Alexandra Resch; Yingjie Xu; Alina Sturdza; Richard Pötter; Nicole Nesvacil
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-19

10.  Dosimetric comparison of surface mould HDR brachytherapy with VMAT.

Authors:  Eeva L Boman; Dean B Paterson; Shelley Pearson; Nichola Naidoo; Carol Johnson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.