Literature DB >> 20227271

Learning latent structure: carving nature at its joints.

Samuel J Gershman1, Yael Niv.   

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms provide powerful explanations for simple learning and decision-making behaviors and the functions of their underlying neural substrates. Unfortunately, in real-world situations that involve many stimuli and actions, these algorithms learn pitifully slowly, exposing their inferiority in comparison to animal and human learning. Here we suggest that one reason for this discrepancy is that humans and animals take advantage of structure that is inherent in real-world tasks to simplify the learning problem. We survey an emerging literature on 'structure learning'--using experience to infer the structure of a task--and how this can be of service to RL, with an emphasis on structure in perception and action. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227271      PMCID: PMC2862793          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  27 in total

1.  Electrolytic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus disrupt renewal of conditional fear after extinction.

Authors:  Jinzhao Ji; Stephen Maren
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.

Authors:  Charles Kemp; Joshua B Tenenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Brain hemispheres selectively track the expected value of contralateral options.

Authors:  Stefano Palminteri; Thomas Boraud; Gilles Lafargue; Bruno Dubois; Mathias Pessiglione
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociating working memory from task difficulty in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  D M Barch; T S Braver; L E Nystrom; S D Forman; D C Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Intra-dimensional/extra-dimensional set-shifting performance in schizophrenia: impact of distractors.

Authors:  Sandra Jazbec; Christos Pantelis; Trevor Robbins; Thomas Weickert; Daniel R Weinberger; Terry E Goldberg
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Motor task variation induces structural learning.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Ad Aertsen; Daniel M Wolpert; Carsten Mehring
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Discrimination learning, reversal, and set-shifting in first-episode schizophrenia: stability over six years and specific associations with medication type and disorganization syndrome.

Authors:  Verity C Leeson; Trevor W Robbins; Elizabeth Matheson; Samuel B Hutton; María A Ron; Thomas R E Barnes; Eileen M Joyce
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 10.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  89 in total

1.  Neural representation of abstract task structure during generalization.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Henry M Jones; Johanny Castillo; David Badre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 2.  Combining fMRI and behavioral measures to examine the process of human learning.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Lauren L Emberson; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Intentional communication: computationally easy or difficult?

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Johan Kwisthout; Mark Blokpoel; Jakub Szymanik; Todd Wareham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Reinforcement learning in multidimensional environments relies on attention mechanisms.

Authors:  Yael Niv; Reka Daniel; Andra Geana; Samuel J Gershman; Yuan Chang Leong; Angela Radulescu; Robert C Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  In a Temporally Segmented Experience Hippocampal Neurons Represent Temporally Drifting Context But Not Discrete Segments.

Authors:  John H Bladon; Daniel Joseph Sheehan; Camila S De Freitas; Marc W Howard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed.

Authors:  Simone Vossel; Christoph Mathys; Jean Daunizeau; Markus Bauer; Jon Driver; Karl J Friston; Klaas E Stephan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Orbitofrontal cortex as a cognitive map of task space.

Authors:  G Schoenbaum; Yael Niv; Robert C Wilson; Yuji K Takahashi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Learning to represent reward structure: a key to adapting to complex environments.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Nakahara; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.304

9.  Structure learning in human sequential decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel E Acuña; Paul Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Decision making under uncertainty: a neural model based on partially observable markov decision processes.

Authors:  Rajesh P N Rao
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.