Literature DB >> 20227242

Measuring waist circumference in disabled adults.

A Waninge1, K A M Ligthart, J Kramer, S Hoeve, C P van der Schans, H H Haisma.   

Abstract

To date, it is unknown whether waist circumference can be measured validly and reliably when a subject is in a supine position. This issue is relevant when international standards for healthy participants are applied to persons with severe intellectual, sensory, and motor disabilities. Thus, the aims of our study were (1) to determine the validity of waist circumference measurements obtained in a supine position, (2) to formulate an equation that predicts standing waist circumference from measurements obtained in a supine position, and (3) to determine the reliability of measuring waist circumference in persons with severe intellectual, sensory, and motor disabilities. First, we performed a validity study in 160 healthy participants, in which we compared waist circumference obtained in standing and supine positions. We also conducted a test-retest study in 43 participants with severe intellectual, sensory, and motor disabilities, in which we measured the waist circumference with participants in the supine position. Validity was assessed with paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. A prediction equation was estimated with multiple regression analysis. Reliability was assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test, limits of agreement (LOA), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test revealed significant differences between standing and supine waist circumference measurements. We formulated an equation to predict waist circumference (R(2)=0.964, p<0.001). There were no significant differences between test and retest waist circumference values in disabled participants (p=0.208; Wilcoxon signed rank test). The LOA was 6.36 cm, indicating a considerable natural variation at the individual level. ICC was .98 (p<0.001). We found that the validity of supine waist circumference is biased towards higher values (1.5 cm) of standing waist circumference. However, standing waist circumference can be predicted from supine measurements using a simple prediction equation. This equation allows the comparison of supine measurements of disabled persons with the international standards. Supine waist circumference can be reliably measured in participants with severe intellectual, sensory, and motor disabilities. 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227242     DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Dev Disabil        ISSN: 0891-4222


  8 in total

1.  Racial differences in adipose tissue distribution and risk of aggressive prostate cancer among men undergoing radiotherapy.

Authors:  Emma H Allott; Lauren E Howard; Hai-Jun Song; Katharine N Sourbeer; Bridget F Koontz; Joseph K Salama; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Measuring Abdominal Circumference and Skeletal Muscle From a Single Cross-Sectional Computed Tomography Image: A Step-by-Step Guide for Clinicians Using National Institutes of Health ImageJ.

Authors:  Sandra L Gomez-Perez; Jacob M Haus; Patricia Sheean; Bimal Patel; Winnie Mar; Vivek Chaudhry; Liam McKeever; Carol Braunschweig
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Prognostic factors for steroid-free remission in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: importance of anthropometric measurements.

Authors:  Jung Sun Lee; Jung Eun Lee; Seokchan Hong; Chang-Keun Lee; Bin Yoo; Ji Seon Oh; Yong-Gil Kim
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.346

4.  Additive interaction between potentially modifiable risk factors and ethnicity among individuals in the Han, Tujia and Miao populations with first-ever ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  Na Zhang; Xinrui Wu; Mengyuan Tian; Xiaolei Wang; Jian Ding; Yong Tian; Chengcai Liang; Zhi Zeng; Hua Xiang; Hongzhuan Tan
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Association of Adipose Tissue Distribution With Type 2 Diabetes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jia Qi; Hui Hu; Lusine Yaghjyan; Lejun An; Harris A Kalim; Erinn O Cooke; Ting-Yuan David Cheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2020-11-23

6.  Incidence and characteristics of stroke in Zanzibar-a hospital-based prospective study in a low-income island population.

Authors:  Jutta M Adelin Jørgensen; Dirk Lund Christensen; Karoline Kragelund Nielsen; Halima Saleh Sadiq; Muhammad Yusuf Khan; Ahmed M Jusabani; Richard Walker
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Fully automated waist circumference measurement on abdominal CT: Comparison with manual measurements and potential value for identifying overweight and obesity as an adjunct output of CT scan.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Min-Sun Kwak; Dae Hyun Park; Soon Ho Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Establishing post mortem criteria for the metabolic syndrome: an autopsy based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Martin Roest Christensen; Anne Bugge; Mariam Elmegaard Malik; Jørgen Lange Thomsen; Niels Lynnerup; Jørgen Rungby; Jytte Banner
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 3.320

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.