Literature DB >> 20227209

Tumorsize dependent detection rate of endorectal MRI of prostate cancer--a histopathologic correlation with whole-mount sections in 70 patients with prostate cancer.

Matthias C Roethke1, Matthias P Lichy, Leo Jurgschat, Jörg Hennenlotter, Ulrich Vogel, David Schilling, Arnulf Stenzl, Claus D Claussen, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of T2w endorectal MRI (eMRI) for correct detection of tumor foci within the prostate regarding tumor size.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 70 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer were examined with T2w eMRI before radical prostatectomy at a 1.5T scanner. For evaluation of eMRI, two radiologists evaluated each tumor focus within the gland. After radical prostatectomy, the prostates were prepared as whole-mount sections, according to transversal T2w eMRI. For each slice, tumor surroundings were marked and compared with eMRI. Based on whole-mount section, 315 slices were evaluated and 533 tumor lesions were documented.
RESULTS: Based on the T2w eMRI, 213 tumor lesions were described. In 137/213, histology could prove these lesions. EMRI was able to visualize 0/56 lesions with a maximum size of <0.3 cm (detection rate 0%), between 0.3 and 0.5 cm 4/116 (3%), between 1 and 0.5 cm 22/169 (13%), between 2 and 1cm 61/136 (45%) and for >2 cm 50/56 (89%). False positive eMRI findings were: <0.3 cm n=0, 0.5-0.3 cm n=12, 0.5-1cm n=34, 1-2 cm n=28 and >2 cm n=2.
CONCLUSION: T2w eMRI cannot exclude prostate cancer with lesions smaller 10mm and 0.4 cm(3) respectively. The detection rate for lesions more than 20mm (1.6 cm(3)) is to be considered as high.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20227209     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

1.  MRI-guided prostate biopsy detects clinically significant cancer: analysis of a cohort of 100 patients after previous negative TRUS biopsy.

Authors:  M Roethke; A G Anastasiadis; M Lichy; M Werner; P Wagner; S Kruck; Claus D Claussen; A Stenzl; H P Schlemmer; D Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  [Fusion imaging in urology: combination of MRI and TRUS for detection of prostate cancer].

Authors:  D Schilling; M Kurosch; R Mager; I Tsaur; A Haferkamp; M Röthke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Accuracy of preoperative endorectal MRI in predicting extracapsular extension and influence on neurovascular bundle sparing in radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Matthias C Roethke; Matthias P Lichy; Michaela Kniess; Matthias K Werner; Claus D Claussen; Arnulf Stenzl; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; David Schilling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Prostate cancer].

Authors:  T Franiel; N Eckardt; M Waginger; M Horstmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Development and evaluation of a multichannel endorectal RF coil for prostate MRI at 7T in combination with an external surface array.

Authors:  M Arcan Ertürk; Jinfeng Tian; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer: current applications and strategies.

Authors:  Daniel J Lee; Hashim U Ahmed; Caroline M Moore; Mark Emberton; Behfar Ehdaie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Junker; Georg Schäfer; Friedrich Aigner; Peter Schullian; Leo Pallwein-Prettner; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-31

8.  Five-point Likert scaling on MRI predicts clinically significant prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Taisuke Harada; Takashige Abe; Fumi Kato; Ryuji Matsumoto; Hiromi Fujita; Sachiyo Murai; Naoto Miyajima; Kunihiko Tsuchiya; Satoru Maruyama; Kohsuke Kudo; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Real-time elastography of the prostate.

Authors:  D Junker; T De Zordo; M Quentin; M Ladurner; J Bektic; W Horniger; W Jaschke; F Aigner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Nonvisible tumors on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging does not predict low-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Kyo Chul Koo; Dong Hoon Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.