Literature DB >> 20224983

Dose delivery estimated by bremsstrahlung imaging and partition model correlated with response following intra-arterial radioembolization with 32P-glass microspheres for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Xiao-Dong Wang1, Ren-Jie Yang, Xi-Cai Cao, Jian Tan, Bin Li.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of a combination of (32)P-glass microsphere-mediated intra-arterial internal radiation and chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma referred for radiation therapy were treated with intra-arterial infusion of (32)P-glass microspheres followed by chemoembolization. beta-bremsstrahlung imaging was performed to monitor microsphere distribution. A partition model and a radiation dose equation were used for determination of radiation exposure in various tissues. Clinical response was evaluated using computed axial tomography scans.
RESULTS: The mean estimated absorption dose in tumor tissue was 137.42 +/- 56.69 Gy. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to establish 90.65 Gy as the cutoff absorption dose with the best sensitivity and specificity for predicting response. The overall tumor response rate was 92%, while response in patients with radiation doses >90.65 Gy was 100%. Overall median patient survival was 15 months.
CONCLUSION: beta-bremsstrahlung imaging following intra-arterial infusion of (32)P-glass microspheres and chemoembolization incorporates effective treatment with convenient dosimetry monitoring and manageable adverse events using a single surgical procedure. This approach is a safe and effective method for ameliorating hepatocellular carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224983     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1180-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

1.  Tolerance of the liver to the effects of Yttrium-90 radiation.

Authors:  B N Gray; M A Burton; D Kelleher; P Klemp; L Matz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Prospective study of treatment with selective internal radiation therapy spheres in patients with unresectable primary or secondary hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  L Lim; P Gibbs; D Yip; J D Shapiro; R Dowling; D Smith; A Little; W Bailey; M Liechtenstein
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.048

3.  Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with 90Yttrium microspheres for extensive colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  R S Stubbs; R J Cannan; A W Mitchell
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

4.  Selective internal radiation therapy with SIR-Spheres in patients with nonresectable liver tumors.

Authors:  Gabriele Pöpperl; Thomas Helmberger; Wolfgang Münzing; Rupert Schmid; Tobias Franz Jacobs; Klaus Tatsch
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.099

5.  Management and prevention of adverse effects related to treatment of liver tumours with 90Y microspheres.

Authors:  Teresa Szyszko; Adil Al-Nahhas; Paul Tait; D Rubello; Ruben Canelo; Nagy Habib; Long Jiao; Harpreet Wasan; D Bansi; A Thillainayagam; K Nijran; G Stamp; E O'Rourke
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Assessment of response to treatment of unresectable liver tumours with 90Y microspheres: value of FDG PET versus computed tomography.

Authors:  Teresa Szyszko; Adil Al-Nahhas; Ruben Canelo; Nagy Habib; Long Jiao; Harpreet Wasan; Margarita Pagou; Paul Tait
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 7.  Current management strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bernardino Rampone; Beniamino Schiavone; Antonio Martino; Carmine Viviano; Giuseppe Confuorto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Radioembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a clinical review.

Authors:  Saad-M Ibrahim; Robert-J Lewandowski; Kent-T Sato; Vanessa-L Gates; Laura Kulik; Mary-F Mulcahy; Robert-K Ryu; Reed-A Omary; Riad Salem
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  A phase I dose escalation trial of yttrium-90 microspheres in the treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  F A Shepherd; L E Rotstein; S Houle; T C Yip; K Paul; K W Sniderman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic arterial yttrium-90 microspheres: a phase I and II study.

Authors:  W Y Lau; W T Leung; S Ho; N W Leung; M Chan; J Lin; C Metreweli; P Johnson; A K Li
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Short-term effectiveness of radiochemoembolization for selected hepatic metastases with a combination protocol.

Authors:  Shahram Akhlaghpoor; Alireza Aziz-Ahari; Mahasti Amoui; Shahnaz Tolooee; Hossein Poorbeigi; Shahab Sheybani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Technical Considerations of Phosphorous-32 Bremsstrahlung SPECT Imaging after Radioembolization of Hepatic Tumors: A Clinical Assessment with a Review of Imaging Parameters.

Authors:  Elahe Pirayesh; Mahasti Amoui; Shahram Akhlaghpoor; Shahnaz Tolooee; Maryam Khorrami; Hossain Poorbeigi; Shahab Sheibani; Majid Assadi
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-27

Review 3.  The effect of intra-arterial angiotensin II on the hepatic tumor to non-tumor blood flow ratio for radioembolization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andor F van den Hoven; Maarten L J Smits; Charlotte E N M Rosenbaum; Helena M Verkooijen; Maurice A A J van den Bosch; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.