Literature DB >> 20224981

Not just for trauma patients: damage control laparotomy in pancreatic surgery.

Katherine Morgan1, Deanna Mansker, David B Adams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) has been a major advance in modern trauma care. The principles of damage control which include truncation of operation to correct acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy with subsequent planned definitive repair are applicable in managing patients undergoing abdominal operations. In order to define indications, technique, and outcome, we undertook a retrospective review and analysis of pancreatic surgery patients in whom DCL was utilized.
METHODS: In a cohort of 835 patients who underwent elective pancreatic operations at the Medical University of South Carolina from 2001 to 2007, eight patients were identified who required DCL. Under Institutional Review Board approval, records were reviewed to define intraoperative blood loss, acidosis, hypothermia, coagulopathy, operative techniques, timing of definitive operation, and hospital outcome.
RESULTS: There were five men and three women with a mean age of 51 years. The diagnosis was chronic pancreatitis in seven patients and cancer in one. The index operation was pancreatoduodenectomy in four patients, distal pancreatectomy in three, and total pancreatectomy in one. In four patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection intraoperative portal vein hemorrhage initiated damage control laparotomy. Four patients had damage control utilized at reoperation for abdominal sepsis (two) and hemorrhage (two). DCL techniques included external tube drainage (eight), abdominal packing (seven), staple closure of open bowel (four), and rapid abdominal closure (four). Operative blood loss ranged from 300 to 12,000 cc. Operative transfusions ranged from 0 to 44 U of packed red cells. Intraoperative INR was greater than 1.5 in four patients, pH ranged from 7.08 to 7.45, and temperature ranged from 34.8 to 38.8 degrees C. Laparotomy for pack removal and intestinal reconstruction was undertaken 1 to 7 days after DCL. Length of hospital stay ranged from 7 to 80 days. Hospital mortality was zero.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with exsanguinating hemorrhage and severe sepsis related to pancreatic surgery can be successfully managed with principles of DCL. Truncation of operation with abdominal packing, bowel closure, external drainage of bile and pancreatic ducts, and rapid abdominal closure with planned subsequent completion laparotomy should be considered in pancreatic operations when patients risk intraoperative acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy due to sepsis or hemorrhage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224981     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1186-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  4 in total

1.  Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: hypothermia and acidoses revisited.

Authors:  N Cosgriff; E E Moore; A Sauaia; M Kenny-Moynihan; J M Burch; B Galloway
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-05

2.  Abbreviated laparotomy and planned reoperation for critically injured patients.

Authors:  J M Burch; V B Ortiz; R J Richardson; R R Martin; K L Mattox; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy.

Authors:  H H Stone; P R Strom; R J Mullins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  'Damage control': an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury.

Authors:  M F Rotondo; C W Schwab; M D McGonigal; G R Phillips; T M Fruchterman; D R Kauder; B A Latenser; P A Angood
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1993-09
  4 in total
  5 in total

1.  Damage control principles for pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Thomas J Howard; Nicholas J Zyromski; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Damage Control Surgery for Non-traumatic Abdominal Emergencies.

Authors:  Edouard Girard; Julio Abba; Bastien Boussat; Bertrand Trilling; Adrian Mancini; Pierre Bouzat; Christian Létoublon; Mircea Chirica; Catherine Arvieux
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prior surgery determines islet yield and insulin requirement in patients with chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Hongjun Wang; Krupa D Desai; Huansheng Dong; Stefanie Owzarski; Joseph Romagnuolo; Katherine A Morgan; David B Adams
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Damage Control Surgery may be a Safe Option for Severe Non-Trauma Peritonitis Management: Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm.

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Michael Parra; Alberto García; Fernando Rodríguez; Yaset Caicedo; José Julián Serna; Alexander Salcedo; Josefa Franco; Luis Eduardo Toro; Juliana Ordoñez; Luis Fernando Pino; Mónica Guzmán; Claudia Orlas; Juan Pablo Herrera; Gonzalo Aristizábal; Francesco Pata; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Trauma and nontrauma damage-control laparotomy: The difference is delirium (data from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma SLEEP-TIME multicenter trial).

Authors:  Kaitlin McArthur; Cassandra Krause; Eugenia Kwon; Xian Luo-Owen; Meghan Cochran-Yu; Lourdes Swentek; Sigrid Burruss; David Turay; Chloe Krasnoff; Areg Grigorian; Jeffry Nahmias; Ahsan Butt; Adam Gutierrez; Aimee LaRiccia; Michelle Kincaid; Michele N Fiorentino; Nina Glass; Samantha Toscano; Eric Ley; Sarah R Lombardo; Oscar D Guillamondegui; James M Bardes; Connie DeLa'O; Salina M Wydo; Kyle Leneweaver; Nicholas T Duletzke; Jade Nunez; Simon Moradian; Joseph Posluszny; Leon Naar; Haytham Kaafarani; Heidi Kemmer; Mark J Lieser; Alexa Dorricott; Grace Chang; Zoltan Nemeth; Kaushik Mukherjee
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.697

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.