Literature DB >> 20224835

Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.

Eduardo Anitua1, Raul Tapia, Felipe Luzuriaga, Gorka Orive.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the length, diameter, and geometry of Biotechnology Institute dental implants on stress distribution in bone. Three-dimensional finite element models of osseointegrated titanium dental implants were created for this study. A force of 150 N was applied at an angle of 30 degrees. The four implant systems used were: Tiny, Interna Universal, Interna Plus, and Interna Wide, and presented the following platforms: 3.5, 4.1, 4.1 (with a 4.8-mm neck), and 5.5 mm, respectively. Implant lengths of 8.5, 10.0, 11.5, 13.0, and 15.0 mm and diameters of 2.5, 3.3, 3.75, 4.0, 4.5, and 5.0 mm were evaluated. Results showed that the effect of implant diameter on stress distribution in bone was more significant than the effect of the implant's length or its geometry. The maximum stress was located around the neck of the implant and the majority of the stress, independent of the parameter being studied, was distributed in the bone adjacent to the first six threads of the implant. Based on these finite element studies, the use of wider implants may be better to dissipate the acting forces and thus reduce the stress in the bone surrounding the implant. Additionally, the use of shorter and wider implants might be a reasonable alternative in sites limited by the height of the residual ridge.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20224835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN: 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Does apical root resection in endodontic microsurgery jeopardize the prosthodontic prognosis?

Authors:  Sin-Yeon Cho; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-05-28

2.  Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takumi Hasegawa; Aki Sasaki; Izumi Saito; Satomi Arimoto; Nanae Yatagai; Yujiro Hiraoka; Daisuke Takeda; Yasumasa Kakei; Masaya Akashi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Analysis of micromovements and peri-implant stresses and strains around ultra-short implants - A three-dimensional finite-element method study.

Authors:  Nida Sumra; Shrikar Desai; Rohit Kulshrestha; Khusbhu Mishra; Raahat Vikram Singh; Prachi Gaonkar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Biomechanical effects of platform switching in two different implant systems: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mahasti Sahabi; Mehdi Adibrad; Fatemeh Sadat Mirhashemi; Sareh Habibzadeh
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-05-31

5.  Influence of three different implant thread designs on stress distribution: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Mansi Manish Oswal; Ulhas N Amasi; Manish S Oswal; Ashish S Bhagat
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Impact of implant diameter and length on stress distribution in osseointegrated implants: A 3D FEA study.

Authors:  R Eazhil; Siva Vadivel Swaminathan; Madhan Gunaseelan; G Vijay Kannan; Chandrapandian Alagesan
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

7.  Effect of the Location of Dental Mini-Implants on Strain Distribution under Mandibular Kennedy Class I Implant-Retained Removable Partial Dentures.

Authors:  Pimduen Rungsiyakull; Kallaya Kujarearntaworn; Pathawee Khongkhunthian; Michael Swain; Chaiy Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-05-04

8.  Biomechanics and load resistance of short dental implants: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Istabrak Hasan; Christoph Bourauel; Torsten Mundt; Friedhelm Heinemann
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2013-05-08

Review 9.  Predictability of short implants ( < 10 mm) as a treatment option for the rehabilitation of atrophic maxillae. A systematic review.

Authors:  J-L Sierra-Sánchez; F García-Sala-Bonmatí; A Martínez-González; C García-Dalmau; J-F Mañes-Ferrer; A Brotons-Oliver
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-05-01

10.  Narrow implants (2.75 and 3.25 mm diameter) supporting a fixed splinted prostheses in posterior regions of mandible: one-year results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tommaso Grandi; Luigi Svezia; Giovanni Grandi
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.