Literature DB >> 20223852

Methods for monitoring patient dose in dental radiology.

Ebba Helmrot1, Anne Thilander-Klang.   

Abstract

Different types of X-ray equipment are used in dental radiology, such as intra-oral, panoramic, cephalometric, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) units. Digital receptors have replaced film and screen-film systems and other technical developments have been made. The radiation doses arising from different types of examination are sparsely documented and often expressed in different radiation quantities. In order to allow the comparison of radiation doses using conventional techniques, i.e. intra-oral, panoramic and cephalometric units, with those obtained using, CBCT or MSCT techniques, the same quantities and units of dose must be used. Dose determination should be straightforward and reproducible, and data should be stored for each image and clinical examination. It is shown here that air kerma-area product (P(KA)) values can be used to monitor the radiation doses used in all types of dental examinations including CBCT and MSCT. However, for the CBCT and MSCT techniques, the methods for the estimation of dose must be more thoroughly investigated. The values recorded can be used to determine the diagnostic standard doses and to set diagnostic reference levels for each type of clinical examination and equipment used. It should also be possible to use these values for the estimation and documentation of organ or effective doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223852     DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  6 in total

1.  Trabecular bone structure parameters from 3D image processing of clinical multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography data.

Authors:  Eva Klintström; Orjan Smedby; Rodrigo Moreno; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.

Authors:  Christina Granlund; Anne Thilander-Klang; Betȕl Ylhan; Sara Lofthag-Hansen; Annika Ekestubbe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance and the relation to risk factors.

Authors:  Dimitrios Makedonas; Henrik Lund; Kerstin Gröndahl; Ken Hansen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Common positioning errors in panoramic radiography: A review.

Authors:  Rafael Henrique Nunes Rondon; Yamba Carla Lara Pereira; Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2014-03-19

5.  Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months and at the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

Authors:  Dimitrios Makedonas; Henrik Lund; Ken Hansen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose.

Authors:  Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Chinem; Beatriz de Souza Vilella; Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Maurício; Lucia Viviana Canevaro; Luiz Fernando Deluiz; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.