Literature DB >> 20223444

Trends in inpatient prolapse procedures in the United States, 1979-2006.

Keisha A Jones1, Jonathan P Shepherd, Sallie S Oliphant, Li Wang, Clareann H Bunker, Jerry L Lowder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe national trends for inpatient procedures for pelvic organ prolapse from 1979-2006. STUDY
DESIGN: The National Hospital Discharge Survey was analyzed for patient and hospital demographics, as were International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic and procedures codes from 1979-2006. Age-adjusted rates (AARs) per 1000 women were calculated using the 1990 US Census data.
RESULTS: There was a significantly decreasing trend in the AARs for inpatient prolapse procedures, from 2.93-1.52 per 1000 women from 1979-2006. AARs for hysterectomy decreased from 8.39-4.55 per 1000 women from 1979-2006. Over the study period, AARs remained at about the 1979 level among the women>or=52 years old (2.73-2.86; P=.075). In women<52 years old, AARs declined to less than one-third of the 1979 rate (3.03-0.84; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: AARs for inpatient procedures for prolapse in the United States remained stable for women aged>or=52 years from 1979-2006; rates declined by two-thirds for women aged<52 years. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20223444      PMCID: PMC3097054          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

1.  Design and operation of the National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1988 redesign.

Authors:  C Dennison; R Pokras
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 1       Date:  2000-12

2.  Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States.

Authors:  L L Subak; L E Waetjen; S van den Eeden; D H Thom; E Vittinghoff; J S Brown
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979-1997.

Authors:  Sarah Hamilton Boyles; Anne M Weber; Leslie Meyn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections.

Authors:  K M Luber; S Boero; J Y Choe
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Vaginal hysterectomy versus tubal ligation: considerations pertaining to the sterilization of multiparous patients with pelvic relaxation.

Authors:  D H Nichols
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Anne M Weber; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  3. Sampling variance of standardized mortality rates.

Authors:  N Keyfitz
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 0.553

8.  Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study.

Authors:  J Mant; R Painter; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1997-05

Review 9.  The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care.

Authors:  S E Swift
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  33 in total

1.  A retrospective cohort study of perioperative management on the morbidity of urogynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Eddie H M Sze; Preiya Jain; Gerry Hobbs
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Matthew D Barber; Nancy Janz; Kim Kenton; Yvonne Hsu; W Jerod Greer; Keisha Dyer; Amanda White; Susan Meikle; Wen Ye
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Mika S Ohno; Monica L Richardson; Eric R Sokol
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparison of two different techniques used in urology and gynecology.

Authors:  Adnan Orhan; Kemal Ozerkan; Hakan Vuruskan; Gokhan Ocakoglu; Isil Kasapoglu; Bahadir Koşan; Gurkan Uncu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Bowel preparation before vaginal prolapse surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alicia C Ballard; Candace Y Parker-Autry; Alayne D Markland; R Edward Varner; Carrie Huisingh; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Alix Leader-Cramer; Margaret Mueller; Bhumy Davé; Alexandria Alverdy; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.

Authors:  C Rondini; H Braun; J Alvarez; M J Urzúa; R Villegas; C Wenzel; C Descouvieres
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.

Authors:  R Liang; S Abramowitch; K Knight; S Palcsey; A Nolfi; A Feola; S Stein; P A Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Lindsay C Turner; Erin S Lavelle; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Autumn L Edenfield; Virginia Pate; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.