Literature DB >> 20223004

Pilot study on low penetrance breast and colorectal cancer predisposition markers in latvia.

Arvids Irmejs1, Edvins Miklasevics, Viktors Boroschenko, Andris Gardovskis, Andrejs Vanags, Inga Melbarde-Gorkusa, Marianna Bitina, Janina Suchy, Janis Gardovskis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has not been established whether CHEK2 and NOD2 variants are present in Latvia and whether inherited variation in these genes influences cancer risk in this population. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the role of CHEK2 and NOD2 mutations in breast and colorectal cancers in the population of Latvia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral venous blood samples were collected from 185 breast cancer and 235 colorectal cancer consecutive hospital-based cases from 11/2003 to 06/2005. The population control group included blood samples from the clamped distal part of the umbilical cord from 978 consecutive anonymous newborns born between 03/2005 and 08/2005. All cases and controls were tested for the presence of NOD2 3020insC mutation and CHEK2 I157T mutation.
RESULTS: NOD2 3020insC was present in 7.7% (18/235) of CRC cancers, in 9.2% (17/185) of breast cancers and in 7.7% (75/974) of controls. CHEK2 I157T variant was found in 7.6% (14/185) of breast cancer cases, 10.2% (24/235) of colon cancer cases and in 6.4% (63/978) of population controls. NOD2 3020insC variant was associated with increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 2.5, p < 0.05) for cases diagnosed at age between 51 and 60 years. CHEK2 I157T variant was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR = 1.7, p < 0.05) with the highest OR = 2.0 for cases diagnosed at age >70 yrs.
CONCLUSIONS: NOD2 3020insC, CHEK2 I157T variants may be associated with increased risk of colorectal and breast cancers in Latvia.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 20223004      PMCID: PMC3401921          DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-4-1-48

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract        ISSN: 1731-2302            Impact factor:   2.857


Introduction

There is continuing interest in identifying DNA variants which are associated with an increased risk of cancer. Several studies have suggested an increased risk of cancer in individuals who carry a mutation in the CHEK2 gene, one of the genes in the DNA damage signalling pathway. Originally, a single founder allele in CHEK2, 1100delC, was reported to be a low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility allele in several studies, and in many ethnic groups [1-4]. Then, a positive association was found between CHEK2 variants and prostate cancer in the USA, Finland and Poland [5-7]. Recently, it was reported that individuals with a single common founder allele in Poland (the I157T missense variant) have increased risk of cancer development in many organs including the breast, prostate, thyroid, kidney and colon [8]. The NOD2 gene is associated with susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease - Crohn's disease [9]. It was reported that a single truncating mutation in NOD2, 3020insC, may confer increased risk of late onset colorectal cancer [10] and then that a NOD2 mutation may be associated with increased susceptibility to lung, ovarian, early-onset laryngeal cancer and early onset breast cancer [11]. It has not been established whether CHEK2 and NOD2 variants are present in Latvia and whether inherited variation in these genes influences cancer risk in this population. To address these issues, we report here the results of the CHEK2 and NOD2 analyses for 185 breast cancer cases and 235 colorectal cancer cases.

Methods

From 11/2003 to 06/2005 family cancer history and peripheral venous blood samples were collected in 185 consecutive hospital-based breast cancer cases and 235 colorectal cancer cases. The population control group included umbilical cord blood samples from 978 consecutively collected anonymous newborn children between 03/2005 and 08/2005. Cases were considered consecutive if at least 70% of newly diagnosed patients were involved in the study from a particular hospital and department in a given period of time. In the breast cancer group, 82 cases were involved from the Regional Oncology Hospital of Daugavpils, 72 cases from the Regional Oncology Hospital of Liepaja and 31 cases from Paula Stradins University Hospital. In the CRC group, 92 cases were involved from the Oncology Center of Latvia, 73 cases from Paula Stradins University Hospital, 46 cases from the Regional Oncology Hospital of Liepaja and 24 cases from the Regional Oncology Hospital of Daugavpils. In the CRC group 114/235 (49%) were females and 121/235 (51%) were males. The distribution of breast and colorectal cancers according to the age of diagnosis are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Distribution of breast cancer and CRC group according to age at time of cancer diagnosis

DecadeBreast cancer%CRC%
20-2910.60%20.90%

30-3994.90%41.70%

40-493116.90%146.00%

subtotal (<50)4122.40%208.60%

50-594625.10%3715.70%

60-695530.00%7933.60%

70-793016.40%8034.00%

80-89105.50%177.20%

>9010.55%20.85%

subtotal (>50)14277.60%21591.40%

total183*235

*In 2 cases time of breast cancer onset was unknown

Distribution of breast cancer and CRC group according to age at time of cancer diagnosis *In 2 cases time of breast cancer onset was unknown Median age of CRC onset was 66 years and median onset of breast cancer was 60 years. In order to evaluate the representativity of breast cancer and CRC groups, they were compared to all newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancers diagnosed between years 1999 and 2003 in Latvia and it was concluded that breast and CRC groups are comparable to the total group of newly diagnosed breast cancers and CRCs as far as age at time of diagnosis and gender are concerned. All cancer and control group samples were tested for the presence of NOD2 3020insC, CHEK2 I157T polymorphisms as described by G. Kurzawski and C. Cybulski respectively [7-10]. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Pauls Stradins University Hospital and the Central Committee of Medical Ethics. All patients completed a family cancer history questionnaire. Family cancer histories were analysed according to internationally approved clinical diagnostic hereditary cancer criteria. If there were no malignancies among relatives of the proband the patient was classified as being negative for a family history of the disease. The prevalence of the CHEK2 and NOD2 alleles in cases and population controls was compared. Odds ratios were generated from two-by-two tables and statistical significance was assessed using the Fisher exact test. The odds ratios were used as estimates of relative risk.

Results

The NOD2 3020insC mutation was present in 7.7% (18/235) of CRC cancers, in 9.2% (17/185) of breast cancer patients and in 7.7% (75/974) of the control group. The CHEK2 I157T polymorphism was found in 7.6% (14/185) of breast cancer patients, 10.2% (24/235) of colon cancer cases and in 6.4% (63/978) of the control group. Statistically significant differences compared to population controls were observed: for NOD2 3020insC for the subgroup of breast cancer patients diagnosed at the age between 51 and 60 (OR = 2.5, p < 0.05) (Table 2); for CHEK2 I157T for the entire series of consecutive colorectal cancers (OR = 1.7, p < 0.05). The highest odds ratio (OR = 2.0, p = 0.06) was observed for CRC diagnosed at age >70 yrs (Table 3).
Table 2

Prevalence of NOD2 3020insC mutation in breast cancer patients, according to age at onset

Age groupsPrevalence of NOD2 3020insC
<410% (0/10)

41-509.7% (3/31)

51-6017% (8/46)*

61-707.3% (4/55)

>704.9% (2/41)

total9.1% (17/185)

* - statistically significant difference as compared to population controls (7.7% (75/974); OR = 2.5, p < 0.05)

Table 3

Prevalence of CHEK2 I157T mutation in colorectal cancer cases according to age at onset

Age groupsPrevalence of CHEK2 I157T
<5115% (3/20)

51-605.4% (2/37)

61-708.9% (7/79)

>7012.1% (12/99)

total10.2% (24/235)*

* - significant difference compared to controls (6.4% (63/978); OR = 1.7, p < 0.05)

Prevalence of NOD2 3020insC mutation in breast cancer patients, according to age at onset * - statistically significant difference as compared to population controls (7.7% (75/974); OR = 2.5, p < 0.05) Prevalence of CHEK2 I157T mutation in colorectal cancer cases according to age at onset * - significant difference compared to controls (6.4% (63/978); OR = 1.7, p < 0.05) In seven NOD2 3020insC positive cases family cancer history was negative. In another 10 cases there were two other relatives affected with cancer in their families, which did not match any recognised diagnostic criteria of hereditary cancer. A single NOD2 3020insC positive patient had a family history of three CRCs in their family. The average age of cancer onset for breast cancer patients harbouring NOD2 3020insC was 58 years. In six NOD2 3020insC positive breast cancer patients their family cancer history was negative. In 5/17 (29%) cases at least two breast cancers were identified in these families and one family matched the criteria of belonging to unspecified strong cancer family aggregation (CFA). The average age of disease onset for CHEK2 I157T positive CRC cases was 67. In 16 cases with the I157T mutation family cancer history was negative. Among another 8 CHEK2 I157T positive CRC patients, 3/24 (13%) matched criteria of CFA, 1/24 (4%) case was suspected of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) and 1/24 (4%) case had late-onset HNPCC. The average age of breast cancer onset for CHEK2 I157T positive cases was 59 years. In four CHEK2 I157T positive breast cancer cases family cancer history was negative. 8/14 (57%) cases had familial breast cancer.

Discussion and conclusions

This first study of low penetrant CRC and breast cancer predisposition markers in Latvia shows a trend that both NOD2 3020insC and CHEK2 I157T polymorphisms are associated with increased risk of colorectal and breast cancers. Statistically significant differences between cases and controls were not as well expressed as it has been recognised in earlier studies from Poland, probably because of the much smaller number of cases and controls, but the general trend was the same - NOD2 3020insC was more frequent among early onset breast cancers and late onset CRCs; CHEK2 I157T was in excess among colorectal cancer and late onset breast cancer cases. In our study we focused on breast and colon cancers. Since for both sites we saw a similar trend as described earlier by the Polish group, we expect that the spectrum of tumours associated with mutations in NOD2 and CHEK2 in Latvia will also include other cancers. However, further studies on larger series of cancers and of different sites are necessary in this regard.
  11 in total

1.  A CHEK2 genetic variant contributing to a substantial fraction of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Pia Vahteristo; Jirina Bartkova; Hannaleena Eerola; Kirsi Syrjäkoski; Salla Ojala; Outi Kilpivaara; Anitta Tamminen; Juha Kononen; Kristiina Aittomäki; Päivi Heikkilä; Kaija Holli; Carl Blomqvist; Jiri Bartek; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Heli Nevanlinna
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  CHEK2*1100delC and susceptibility to breast cancer: a collaborative analysis involving 10,860 breast cancer cases and 9,065 controls from 10 studies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Y Ogura; D K Bonen; N Inohara; D L Nicolae; F F Chen; R Ramos; H Britton; T Moran; R Karaliuskas; R H Duerr; J P Achkar; S R Brant; T M Bayless; B S Kirschner; S B Hanauer; G Nuñez; J H Cho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  CHEK2 is a multiorgan cancer susceptibility gene.

Authors:  C Cybulski; B Górski; T Huzarski; B Masojć; M Mierzejewski; T Debniak; U Teodorczyk; T Byrski; J Gronwald; J Matyjasik; E Zlowocka; M Lenner; E Grabowska; K Nej; J Castaneda; K Medrek; A Szymańska; J Szymańska; G Kurzawski; J Suchy; O Oszurek; A Witek; S A Narod; J Lubiński
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Ans van den Ouweland; Jan Klijn; Marijke Wasielewski; Anja de Snoo; Rogier Oldenburg; Antoinette Hollestelle; Mark Houben; Ellen Crepin; Monique van Veghel-Plandsoen; Fons Elstrodt; Cornelia van Duijn; Carina Bartels; Carel Meijers; Mieke Schutte; Lesley McGuffog; Deborah Thompson; Douglas Easton; Nayanta Sodha; Sheila Seal; Rita Barfoot; Jon Mangion; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diana Eccles; Rosalind Eeles; D Gareth Evans; Richard Houlston; Victoria Murday; Steven Narod; Tamara Peretz; Julian Peto; Catherine Phelan; Hong Xiang Zhang; Csilla Szabo; Peter Devilee; David Goldgar; P Andrew Futreal; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara Weber; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  A novel founder CHEK2 mutation is associated with increased prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Cezary Cybulski; Tomasz Huzarski; Bohdan Górski; Bartłomiej Masojć; Marek Mierzejewski; Tadeusz Debniak; Bartłomiej Gliniewicz; Joanna Matyjasik; Elzbieta Złowocka; Grzegorz Kurzawski; Andrzej Sikorski; Michał Posmyk; Marek Szwiec; Ryszard Czajka; Steven A Narod; Jan Lubiński
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Mutations in CHEK2 associated with prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Xiangyang Dong; Liang Wang; Ken Taniguchi; Xianshu Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Shannon K McDonnell; Chiping Qian; Angela F Marks; Susan L Slager; Brett J Peterson; David I Smith; John C Cheville; Michael L Blute; Steve J Jacobsen; Daniel J Schaid; Donald J Tindall; Stephen N Thibodeau; Wanguo Liu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The CHEK2*1100delC variant acts as a breast cancer risk modifier in non-BRCA1/BRCA2 multiple-case families.

Authors:  Rogier A Oldenburg; Karin Kroeze-Jansema; Jaennelle Kraan; Hans Morreau; Jan G M Klijn; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Marjolein J L Ligtenberg; Christi J van Asperen; Hans F A Vasen; Carel Meijers; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Truuske H de Bock; Cees J Cornelisse; Peter Devilee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  The NOD2 3020insC mutation and the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Grzegorz Kurzawski; Janina Suchy; Józef Kładny; Ewa Grabowska; Marek Mierzejewski; Anna Jakubowska; Tadeusz Debniak; Cezary Cybulski; Elsbieta Kowalska; Zbigniew Szych; Wenancjusz Domagała; Rodney J Scott; Jan Lubiński
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  CHEK2 variants associate with hereditary prostate cancer.

Authors:  E H Seppälä; T Ikonen; N Mononen; V Autio; A Rökman; M P Matikainen; T L J Tammela; J Schleutker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cumulative Small Effect Genetic Markers and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Authors:  Pablo Serrano-Fernandez; Dagmara Dymerska; Grzegorz Kurzawski; Róża Derkacz; Tatiana Sobieszczańska; Zbigniew Banaszkiewicz; Hanno Roomere; Eneli Oitmaa; Andres Metspalu; Ramūnas Janavičius; Pavel Elsakov; Mindaugas Razumas; Kestutis Petrulis; Arvīds Irmejs; Edvīns Miklaševičs; Rodney J Scott; Jan Lubiński
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 2.260

2.  A risk of breast cancer in women - carriers of constitutional CHEK2 gene mutations, originating from the North - Central Poland.

Authors:  Aneta Bąk; Hanna Janiszewska; Anna Junkiert-Czarnecka; Marta Heise; Maria Pilarska-Deltow; Ryszard Laskowski; Magdalena Pasińska; Olga Haus
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 3.  CHEK2 Germline Variants in Cancer Predisposition: Stalemate Rather than Checkmate.

Authors:  Lenka Stolarova; Petra Kleiblova; Marketa Janatova; Jana Soukupova; Petra Zemankova; Libor Macurek; Zdenek Kleibl
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Investigation of the effects of DNA repair gene polymorphisms on the risk of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ian P M Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston; Grant W Montgomery; Oliver M Sieber; Malcolm G Dunlop
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  NOD2 polymorphisms associated with cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jingwei Liu; Caiyun He; Qian Xu; Chengzhong Xing; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.