| Literature DB >> 20223004 |
Arvids Irmejs1, Edvins Miklasevics, Viktors Boroschenko, Andris Gardovskis, Andrejs Vanags, Inga Melbarde-Gorkusa, Marianna Bitina, Janina Suchy, Janis Gardovskis.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It has not been established whether CHEK2 and NOD2 variants are present in Latvia and whether inherited variation in these genes influences cancer risk in this population. AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate the role of CHEK2 and NOD2 mutations in breast and colorectal cancers in the population of Latvia.Entities:
Year: 2006 PMID: 20223004 PMCID: PMC3401921 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-4-1-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hered Cancer Clin Pract ISSN: 1731-2302 Impact factor: 2.857
Distribution of breast cancer and CRC group according to age at time of cancer diagnosis
| Decade | Breast cancer | % | CRC | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-29 | 1 | 0.60% | 2 | 0.90% |
| 30-39 | 9 | 4.90% | 4 | 1.70% |
| 40-49 | 31 | 16.90% | 14 | 6.00% |
| 50-59 | 46 | 25.10% | 37 | 15.70% |
| 60-69 | 55 | 30.00% | 79 | 33.60% |
| 70-79 | 30 | 16.40% | 80 | 34.00% |
| 80-89 | 10 | 5.50% | 17 | 7.20% |
| >90 | 1 | 0.55% | 2 | 0.85% |
| total | 183* | 235 | ||
*In 2 cases time of breast cancer onset was unknown
Prevalence of NOD2 3020insC mutation in breast cancer patients, according to age at onset
| Age groups | Prevalence of NOD2 3020insC |
|---|---|
| <41 | 0% (0/10) |
| 41-50 | 9.7% (3/31) |
| 51-60 | 17% (8/46)* |
| 61-70 | 7.3% (4/55) |
| >70 | 4.9% (2/41) |
| total | 9.1% (17/185) |
* - statistically significant difference as compared to population controls (7.7% (75/974); OR = 2.5, p < 0.05)
Prevalence of CHEK2 I157T mutation in colorectal cancer cases according to age at onset
| Age groups | Prevalence of CHEK2 I157T |
|---|---|
| <51 | 15% (3/20) |
| 51-60 | 5.4% (2/37) |
| 61-70 | 8.9% (7/79) |
| >70 | 12.1% (12/99) |
| total | 10.2% (24/235)* |
* - significant difference compared to controls (6.4% (63/978); OR = 1.7, p < 0.05)