Literature DB >> 20222019

Safety and effectiveness of the INVATEC MO.MA proximal cerebral protection device during carotid artery stenting: results from the ARMOUR pivotal trial.

Gary M Ansel1, L Nelson Hopkins, Michael R Jaff, Paolo Rubino, J Michael Bacharach, Dierk Scheinert, Subbarao Myla, Tony Das, Alberto Cremonesi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The multicenter ARMOUR (ProximAl PRotection with the MO.MA Device DUring CaRotid Stenting) trial evaluated the 30-day safety and effectiveness of the MO.MA Proximal Cerebral Protection Device (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) utilized to treat high surgical risk patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS).
BACKGROUND: Distal embolic protection devices (EPD) have been traditionally utilized during CAS. The MO.MA device acts as a balloon occlusion "endovascular clamping" system to achieve cerebral protection prior to crossing the carotid stenosis.
METHODS: This prospective registry enrolled 262 subjects, 37 roll-in and 225 pivotal subjects evaluated with intention to treat (ITT) from September 2007 to February 2009. Subjects underwent CAS using the MO.MA device. The primary endpoint, myocardial infarction, stroke, or death through 30 days (30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]) was compared to a performance goal of 13% derived from trials utilizing distal EPD.
RESULTS: For the ITT population, the mean age was 74.7 years with 66.7% of the cohort being male. Symptomatic patients comprised 15.1% and 28.9% were octogenarians. Device success was 98.2% and procedural success was 93.2%. The 30-day MACCE rate was 2.7% [95% CI (1.0-5.8%)] with a 30-day major stroke rate of 0.9%. No symptomatic patient suffered a stroke during this trial.
CONCLUSIONS: The ARMOUR trial demonstrated that the MO.MA(R) Proximal Cerebral Protection Device is safe and effective for high surgical risk patients undergoing CAS. The absence of stroke in symptomatic patients is the lowest rate reported in any independently adjudicated prospective multicenter registry trial to date. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20222019     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  19 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Carotid stenting vs endarterectomy: new results in perspective.

Authors:  William J Perkins; Guiseppe Lanzino; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Carotid artery disease and stenting: insights from recent clinical trials.

Authors:  Ronan Margey; Douglas E Drachman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-04

4.  Safety Outcomes Using a Proximal Protection Device in Carotid Stenting of Long Carotid Stenoses.

Authors:  Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul; Priyank Khandelwal; Sudheer Ambekar; Kevin Ramdas; Luis Guada; Dileep Yavagal
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-06-16

5.  European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Leo H Bonati; Stavros Kakkos; Joachim Berkefeld; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Alison Halliday; Isabelle van Herzeele; Igor Koncar; Dominick Jh McCabe; Avtar Lal; Jean-Baptiste Ricco; Peter Ringleb; Martin Taylor-Rowan; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2021-05-11

6.  Immediate and Delayed Procedural Stroke or Death in Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Stefanie von Felten; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Martin Brown; Richard Bulbulia; David Calvet; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; John Gregson; George Howard; Olav Jansen; Jean-Louis Mas; Thomas G Brott; Peter A Ringleb; Leo H Bonati
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  [Carotid artery stenting technique].

Authors:  J Schofer; K Bijuklic
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

8.  Carotid stenting with proximal cerebral protection in symptomatic low-grade vulnerable recurrent carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Joaquin de Haro; Javier Rodriguez-Padilla; Silvia Bleda; Cristina Cañibano; Ignacio Michel; Francisco Acin
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Safety and Efficacy of Flow Reversal in Acute and Elective Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Using the Mo.Ma Device with Short-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ambooj Tiwari; Ryan Bo; Keithan Sivakumar; Karthikeyan M Arcot; Philip Ye; David T Parrella; Jeffrey Farkas
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2019-08-05

10.  Carotid artery stenting and patient outcomes: the CABANA surveillance study.

Authors:  L Nelson Hopkins; Christopher J White; Malcolm T Foster; Richard J Powell; Gerald Zemel; Juan Diaz-Cartelle
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.