G D E Papini1, S Tritella, F Secchi, A Aliprandi, G Di Leo, F Sardanelli. 1. Dipartimento di Scienze Medico-Chirurgiche, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Servizio di Radiologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Morandi 30, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was done to estimate delayed enhancement (DE) contrast resolution of infarcted myocardium (IM) relative to intraventricular blood (IB) and viable myocardium (VM) using gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval from the Ethics Committee, we retrospectively evaluated 21 consecutive patients (61+/-10 years) with a healed myocardial infarction who underwent 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using an inversion-recovery-prepared turbo gradient-echo sequence 10 minutes after injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA. Signal intensity (SI) was measured in arbitrary units (au) for IM, IB, VM, and outside the patient. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for IM to IB and IM to VM. Seven consecutive patients (59+/-6 years) with a healed myocardial infarction studied with similar technique but with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) served as the control group. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Mean SI of IM was 44+/-16 au for Gd-BOPTA and 20+/-6 au for Gd-DOTA (p<0.001), that of IB 35+/-15 au and 14+/-5 au (p=0.016), and that of VM 7+/-3 au and 5+/-2 au (p=0.116), respectively. Mean IM to IB CNR was 10+/-7 for Gd-BOPTA and 8+/-5 for Gd-DOTA (p=0.836), that of IM to VM was 45+/-27 and 18+/-6, respectively (p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Gd-BOPTA at 0.1 mmol/kg produced a higher myocardial DE and an IM to VM CNR than a single dose of Gd-DOTA. No significant difference was observed for IM to IB CNR.
PURPOSE: This study was done to estimate delayed enhancement (DE) contrast resolution of infarcted myocardium (IM) relative to intraventricular blood (IB) and viable myocardium (VM) using gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval from the Ethics Committee, we retrospectively evaluated 21 consecutive patients (61+/-10 years) with a healed myocardial infarction who underwent 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using an inversion-recovery-prepared turbo gradient-echo sequence 10 minutes after injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of Gd-BOPTA. Signal intensity (SI) was measured in arbitrary units (au) for IM, IB, VM, and outside the patient. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for IM to IB and IM to VM. Seven consecutive patients (59+/-6 years) with a healed myocardial infarction studied with similar technique but with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA) served as the control group. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Mean SI of IM was 44+/-16 au for Gd-BOPTA and 20+/-6 au for Gd-DOTA (p<0.001), that of IB 35+/-15 au and 14+/-5 au (p=0.016), and that of VM 7+/-3 au and 5+/-2 au (p=0.116), respectively. Mean IM to IB CNR was 10+/-7 for Gd-BOPTA and 8+/-5 for Gd-DOTA (p=0.836), that of IM to VM was 45+/-27 and 18+/-6, respectively (p=0.012). CONCLUSIONS:Gd-BOPTA at 0.1 mmol/kg produced a higher myocardial DE and an IM to VM CNR than a single dose of Gd-DOTA. No significant difference was observed for IM to IB CNR.
Authors: Frederik L Giesel; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Iain D Wilkinson; Peter Siegler; Claus-W von der Lieth; Martin Frank; Klaus P Lodemann; Marco Essig Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Dale R Broome; Mark S Girguis; Pedro W Baron; Alfred C Cottrell; Ingrid Kjellin; Gerald A Kirk Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: R J Kim; D S Fieno; T B Parrish; K Harris; E L Chen; O Simonetti; J Bundy; J P Finn; F J Klocke; R M Judd Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas Schlosser; Peter Hunold; Christoph U Herborn; Heidrun Lehmkuhl; Alexander Lind; Sandra Massing; Jörg Barkhausen Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Joseph B Selvanayagam; Attila Kardos; Jane M Francis; Frank Wiesmann; Steffen E Petersen; David P Taggart; Stefan Neubauer Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-09-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G Ligabue; F Fiocchi; S Ferraresi; A Barbieri; R Rossi; M G Modena; R Romagnoli; P Torricelli Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Martin R Prince; Honglei Zhang; Michael Morris; Jennifer L MacGregor; Marc E Grossman; Jeffrey Silberzweig; Robert L DeLapaz; Henry J Lee; Cynthia M Magro; Anthony M Valeri Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: L Natale; C Napolitano; A Bernardini; A Meduri; R Marano; A Lombardo; F Crea; L Bonomo Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 3.469