Literature DB >> 10652521

Attentional modulation of visual motion perception.

.   

Abstract

How is the perception and processing of visual motion affected by attention? This review examines recent research in cognition, perception and neurophysiology that explores how ongoing behavioural tasks (and the attentional states they impose) modulate the processing of visual motion. Although traditional views hold that motion is processed in an obligatory, 'pre-attentive' manner, evidence for processing in a task-independent manner is scant. Recent studies of human perception that have measured motion priming, motion aftereffects, uncertainty effects, and motion-interaction effects indicate instead that even simple aspects of motion processing may be substantially affected by whether motion information in a task is used or ignored by the perceiver. Single-unit studies in brain areas sensitive to visual motion in monkeys, and functional imaging studies on humans, also indicate that task and attentional state affect activity levels in brain regions thought to be important in motion perception. This review brings together these converging findings of attentional modulation of motion perception and considers them in light of object-oriented theories of attention.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10652521     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01437-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  12 in total

1.  Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis.

Authors:  Kairi Kreegipuu; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-25

2.  Shared attentional resources for global and local motion processing.

Authors:  Paul F Bulakowski; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Distinct effects of attention on the neural responses to form and motion processing: a SSVEP source-imaging study.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Justin M Ales; Alex R Wade; Benoit R Cottereau; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Conflict with vision diminishes proprioceptive adaptation to muscle vibration.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Rita Azzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect.

Authors:  Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Rita Azzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Action and attentional load can influence aperture effects on motion perception.

Authors:  Patricia R DeLucia; Tammy E Ott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A Collaborator's Reputation Can Bias Decisions and Anxiety under Uncertainty.

Authors:  Song Qi; Owen Footer; Colin F Camerer; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Top-down beta rhythms support selective attention via interlaminar interaction: a model.

Authors:  Jung H Lee; Miles A Whittington; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Decreased coherent motion discrimination in autism spectrum disorder: the role of attentional zoom-out deficit.

Authors:  Luca Ronconi; Simone Gori; Milena Ruffino; Sandro Franceschini; Barbara Urbani; Massimo Molteni; Andrea Facoetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?

Authors:  Elizabeth G Conlon; Gry Lilleskaret; Craig M Wright; Anne Stuksrud
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.