Literature DB >> 20221317

Flexible Phase I Clinical Trials: Allowing for Nonbinary Toxicity Response and Removal of Other Common Limitations.

Richard F Potthoff1, Stephen L George.   

Abstract

Phase I clinical trials are often subject to severe limitations. The most important one is that they typically allow only for binary response-toxic (1) or nontoxic (0)-rather than a range of responses from 0 to 1. They also may not allow a new patient to be treated until results for all previous patients are available. They may assign patients to doses in groups of two or more, rather than individually. They may require the selected dose to be one of a few prespecified doses. The flexible method proposed here addresses these four limitations. It adopts a quasi-Bayesian approach incorporating a logistic dose-response model with two parameters for the mean response. The response at any dose follows a beta distribution, which entails a third parameter. The choice of dose for a patient is based on a utility function that reflects the latest estimates of toxicity and of the variance of the estimate of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Simulations show that the method works well, and that a nonbinary toxicity measure leads to a far more accurate MTD estimate than does a binary one.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20221317      PMCID: PMC2835371          DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2009.0014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res        ISSN: 1946-6315            Impact factor:   1.452


  14 in total

1.  Bayesian methods for phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  C Gatsonis; J B Greenhouse
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Rethinking risk-benefit assessment for phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Using toxicity grades in the design and analysis of cancer phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  N H Gordon; J K Willson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  B E Storer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Phase I trial evaluating the safety of bevacizumab with concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Christopher H Crane; Lee M Ellis; James L Abbruzzese; Christina Amos; Henry Q Xiong; Linus Ho; Douglas B Evans; Eric P Tamm; Chaan Ng; Peter W T Pisters; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Marc E Delclos; Michael O'Reilly; Jeffrey E Lee; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies.

Authors:  S N Goodman; M L Zahurak; S Piantadosi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A comparison of two phase I trial designs.

Authors:  E L Korn; D Midthune; T T Chen; L V Rubinstein; M C Christian; R M Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Patient characteristics compete with dose as predictors of acute treatment toxicity in early phase clinical trials.

Authors:  André Rogatko; James S Babb; Hao Wang; Michael J Slifker; Gary R Hudes
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  The continual reassessment method for multiple toxicity grades: a Bayesian quasi-likelihood approach.

Authors:  Z Yuan; R Chappell; H Bailey
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments.

Authors:  J Whitehead; H Brunier
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995 May 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  Dose escalation with overdose control using a quasi-continuous toxicity score in cancer Phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhengjia Chen; Mourad Tighiouart; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.