AIMS: In young patients with or without a congenital heart disease, transvenous leads for pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators can cause later vascular obstruction or infection. Removal of non-functional leads is controversial as it bears the risk of vascular disrupture and embolizations. We report the data of a single centre for paediatric cardiology on efficiency and safety of transvenous lead removal. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between May 2005 and August 2009 in 22 patients with a mean age of 12.9 years (range: 3.6-29.5 years) removal of 28 transvenous leads (mean lead age: 5.1 years) was attempted. The main indications for removal were vascular obstruction, increased threshold, and lead dislocation. Commercially available retraction tools were used, if necessary. Twenty-five leads (89%) were retrieved with clinical success, of which 22 (79%) were removed with complete procedural success. In three leads the lead tips were retained, while three leads could not be retrieved. No major complications occurred. Additional interventions such as recanalization, balloon dilation, or stent implantation were performed as indicated. Procedure and X-ray times could be correlated to the implant age of the leads. CONCLUSION: Using non-electrical techniques, transvenous lead removal can be performed with a success rate of 89% in young patients. In the case of vessel obstructions, lead replacement combined with revascularization should be performed early, as the older the lead, the more prolonged and more hazardous the extraction procedure becomes. The use of new leads and precautionary implantation techniques may facilitate later lead removal.
AIMS: In young patients with or without a congenital heart disease, transvenous leads for pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators can cause later vascular obstruction or infection. Removal of non-functional leads is controversial as it bears the risk of vascular disrupture and embolizations. We report the data of a single centre for paediatric cardiology on efficiency and safety of transvenous lead removal. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between May 2005 and August 2009 in 22 patients with a mean age of 12.9 years (range: 3.6-29.5 years) removal of 28 transvenous leads (mean lead age: 5.1 years) was attempted. The main indications for removal were vascular obstruction, increased threshold, and lead dislocation. Commercially available retraction tools were used, if necessary. Twenty-five leads (89%) were retrieved with clinical success, of which 22 (79%) were removed with complete procedural success. In three leads the lead tips were retained, while three leads could not be retrieved. No major complications occurred. Additional interventions such as recanalization, balloon dilation, or stent implantation were performed as indicated. Procedure and X-ray times could be correlated to the implant age of the leads. CONCLUSION: Using non-electrical techniques, transvenous lead removal can be performed with a success rate of 89% in young patients. In the case of vessel obstructions, lead replacement combined with revascularization should be performed early, as the older the lead, the more prolonged and more hazardous the extraction procedure becomes. The use of new leads and precautionary implantation techniques may facilitate later lead removal.
Authors: Andrzej Kutarski; Wojciech Jacheć; Łukasz Tułecki; Marek Czajkowski; Dorota Nowosielecka; Paweł Stefańczyk; Konrad Tomków; Anna Polewczyk Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Michał Chudzik; Andrzej Kutarski; Przemysław Mitkowski; Andrzej Przybylski; Joanna Lewek; Barbara Małecka; Tomasz Smukowski; Aleksander Maciąg; Janusz Smigielski Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Christian Paech; Martin Kostelka; Ingo Dähnert; Patrick Flosdorff; Frank Thomas Riede; Roman Antonin Gebauer Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 1.637