Literature DB >> 20218128

Medicalization of female genital cutting in Egypt.

A Refaat1.   

Abstract

The medicalization of female genital cutting (FGC) has been increasing. This cross-sectional study estimated the determinants of the practice of FGC among Egyptian physicians. Responses from 193 physicians showed that while 88% of them knew at least one adverse physical or sexual consequence, 18% approved of it, mostly as a religious observation (82%). Almost one-fifth (19%) of physicians practised FGC, mostly due to conviction (51%) or for profit (30%). A negative correlation was found between knowledge of the adverse consequences of FGC and both approval and practice. Cultural influences were the highest determinant (81%) followed by lack of knowledge (35%).

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20218128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  East Mediterr Health J        ISSN: 1020-3397            Impact factor:   1.628


  10 in total

Review 1.  What do we know about assessing healthcare students and professionals' knowledge, attitude and practice regarding female genital mutilation? A systematic review.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Lale Say; Christina Pallitto
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 2.  Understanding the motivations of health-care providers in performing female genital mutilation: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Doucet; Christina Pallitto; Danielle Groleau
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Health care providers' and mothers' perceptions about the medicalization of female genital mutilation or cutting in Egypt: a cross-sectional qualitative study.

Authors:  Omaima El-Gibaly; Mirette Aziz; Salma Abou Hussein
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2019-08-27

4.  Involving the health sector in the prevention and care of female genital mutilation: results from formative research in Guinea.

Authors:  Mamadou Dioulde Balde; Anne Marie Soumah; Aissatou Diallo; Alpha Oumar Sall; Vernon Mochache; Wisal Ahmed; Amadou Oury Toure; Ramata Diallo; Sadan Camara; Sarah O'Neill; Christina C Pallitto
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.355

5.  What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen; Nafissatou J Diop; Glenn Laverack; Els Leye
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-23

Review 6.  Female genital mutilation and cutting: a systematic literature review of health professionals' knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.

Authors:  Yvonne Zurynski; Premala Sureshkumar; Amy Phu; Elizabeth Elliott
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2015-12-10

Review 7.  Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates.

Authors:  Samuel Kimani; Bettina Shell-Duncan
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2018-02-21

8.  Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries.

Authors:  R Elise B Johansen; Mai Mahgoub Ziyada; Bettina Shell-Duncan; Adriana Marcusàn Kaplan; Els Leye
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Female genital mutilation/cutting: Emerging factors sustaining medicalization related changes in selected Kenyan communities.

Authors:  Samuel Kimani; Caroline W Kabiru; Jacinta Muteshi; Jaldesa Guyo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Medicalization of female genital cutting in Malaysia: A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Abdul Rashid; Yufu Iguchi; Siti Nur Afiqah
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 11.069

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.