Literature DB >> 20217588

Nanoparticle characterization for cancer nanotechnology and other biological applications.

Scott C Brown1, Maria Palazuelos, Parvesh Sharma, Kevin W Powers, Stephen M Roberts, Stephen R Grobmyer, Brij M Moudgil.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is actively being used to develop promising diagnostics and therapeutics tools for the treatment of cancer and many other diseases. The unique properties of nanomaterials offer an exciting frontier of possibilities for biomedical researchers and scientists. Because existing knowledge of macroscopic materials does not always allow for adequate prediction of the characteristics and behaviors of nanoscale materials in controlled environments, much less in biological systems, careful nanoparticle characterization should accompany biomedical applications of these materials. Informed correlations between adequately characterized nanomaterial properties and reliable biological endpoints are essential for guiding present and future researchers toward clinical nanotechnology-based solutions for cancer. Biological environments are notoriously dynamic; hence, nanoparticulate interactions within these environments will likely be comparatively diverse. For this reason, we recommend that an interactive and systematic approach to material characterization be taken when attempting to elucidate or measure biological interactions with nanoscale materials. We intend for this chapter to be a practical guide that could be used by researchers to identify key nanomaterial characteristics that require measurement for their systems and the appropriate techniques to perform those measurements. Each section includes a basic overview of each measurement and notes on how to address some of the common difficulties associated with nanomaterial characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20217588     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60761-609-2_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  8 in total

1.  Macrophage scavenger receptor A mediates the uptake of gold colloids by macrophages in vitro.

Authors:  Angela França; Parag Aggarwal; Eugene V Barsov; Serguei V Kozlov; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; África González-Fernández
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.307

2.  Preparation, characterization, and in vitro dosimetry of dispersed, engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Glen M DeLoid; Joel M Cohen; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 13.491

3.  Essential Elements to Consider for MRI Cell Tracking Studies with Iron Oxide-based Labeling Agents.

Authors:  Paul C Wang; Liang Shan
Journal:  J Basic Clin Med       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Toward advancing nano-object count metrology: a best practice framework.

Authors:  Scott C Brown; Volodymyr Boyko; Greg Meyers; Matthias Voetz; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Laser Ablation for Cancer: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Emiliano Schena; Paola Saccomandi; Yuman Fong
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2017-06-14

6.  Multifunctional Cu2-xTe Nanocubes Mediated Combination Therapy for Multi-Drug Resistant MDA MB 453.

Authors:  Aby Cheruvathoor Poulose; Srivani Veeranarayanan; M Sheikh Mohamed; Rebeca Romero Aburto; Trevor Mitcham; Richard R Bouchard; Pulickel M Ajayan; Yasushi Sakamoto; Toru Maekawa; D Sakthi Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Nickel-doped cerium oxide nanoparticles: biosynthesis, cytotoxicity and UV protection studies.

Authors:  Abdolhossein Miri; Mina Sarani; Mehrdad Khatami
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 8.  How the Lack of Chitosan Characterization Precludes Implementation of the Safe-by-Design Concept.

Authors:  Cíntia Marques; Claudia Som; Mélanie Schmutz; Olga Borges; Gerrit Borchard
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.