Literature DB >> 20216110

Multisite analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT cyclosporine assay.

Pierre Wallemacq1, Gregory T Maine, Keith Berg, Thomas Rosiere, Pierre Marquet, Giuseppe Aimo, Giulio Mengozzi, Julianna Young, Kurt Wonigeit, Robert Kretschmer, Bendicht Wermuth, Rainer W Schmid.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Abbott ARCHITECT Cyclosporine (CsA) immunoassay in 7 clinical laboratories in comparison to liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), Abbott TDx, Cobas Integra 800, and the Dade Dimension Xpand immunoassay. The ARCHITECT assay uses a whole blood specimen, a pretreatment step with organic reagents to precipitate proteins and extract the drug, followed by a 2-step automated immunoassay with magnetic microparticles coated with anti-CsA antibody and an acridinium-CsA tracer. Imprecision testing at the 7 evaluation sites gave a range of total % coefficient of variations of 7.5%-12.2% at 87.5 ng/mL, 6.6%-14.3% at 411 ng/mL, and 5.2%-10.7% at 916 ng/mL. The lower limit of quantification ranged from 12 to 20 ng/mL. Purified CsA metabolites AM1, AM1c, AM4N, AM9, and AM19 were tested in whole blood by the ARCHITECT assay and showed minimal cross-reactivity at all 7 sites. In particular, AM1 and AM9 cross-reactivity in the ARCHITECT assay, ranged from -2.5% to 0.2% and -0.8% to 2.2%, respectively, and was significantly lower than for the TDx assay, in which the values were 3.2% and 16.1%, respectively. Comparable testing of metabolites in the Dade Dimension Xpand assay at 2 evaluation sites showed cross-reactivity to AM4N (6.4% and 6.8%) and AM9 (2.6% and 3.6%) and testing on the Roche Integra 800 showed cross-reactivity to AM1c (2.4%), AM9 (10.7%), and AM19 (2.8%). Cyclosporine International Proficiency Testing Scheme samples, consisting of both pooled specimens from patients receiving CsA therapy as well as whole-blood specimens supplemented with CsA, were tested by the ARCHITECT assay at 6 sites and showed an average bias of -24 to -58 ng/mL versus LC/MSMS CsA and -2 to -37 ng/mL versus AxSYM CsA. Studies were performed with the ARCHITECT CsA assay on patient specimens with the following results: ARCHITECT CsA assay versus LC/MSMS, average bias of 31 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus the Dade Dimension assay (4 sites), average biases of -7 to -228 ng/mL; ARCHITECT versus AxSYM and TDx, average biases of -4 and -53 ng/mL, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients were >or=0.89. The ARCHITECT CsA assay has significantly reduced CsA metabolite interference relative to other immunoassays and is a convenient and sensitive semiautomated method to measure CsA in whole blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20216110      PMCID: PMC5374220          DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181d46386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the new AxSYM cyclosporine assay: comparison with TDx monoclonal whole blood and Emit cyclosporine assays.

Authors:  P E Wallemacq; K Alexandre
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Robotic automation of cyclosporine analysis in whole blood.

Authors:  J W Holman; R A Felder
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Multi-site analytical evaluation of a chemiluminescent magnetic microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for sirolimus on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyzer.

Authors:  Rainer W Schmid; Johannes Lotz; Rosemarie Schweigert; Karl Lackner; Giuseppe Aimo; Judith Friese; Thomas Rosiere; Diana Dickson; Daniel Kenney; Gregory T Maine
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Abbott TDx monoclonal antibody assay evaluated for measuring cyclosporine in whole blood.

Authors:  R W Yatscoff; K R Copeland; C J Faraci
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Identification and analysis of nine metabolites of cyclosporine in whole blood by liquid chromatography. 2: Comparison of patients' results.

Authors:  G L Lensmeyer; D A Wiebe; I H Carlson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 6.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Update on Lake Louise Consensus Conference on cyclosporin and tacrolimus.

Authors:  M Oellerich; V W Armstrong; E Schütz; L M Shaw
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.281

7.  Three commercial polyclonal immunoassays for cyclosporine in whole blood compared: 1. Results with patients' specimens.

Authors:  M J Strassman; G L Lensmeyer; D A Wiebe; I H Carlson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Measurement of cyclosporine by liquid chromatography and three immunoassays in blood from liver, cardiac, and renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  J H McBride; S S Kim; D O Rodgerson; A F Reyes; M K Ota
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Cyclosporin whole blood immunoassays (AxSYM, CEDIA, and Emit): a critical overview of performance characteristics and comparison with HPLC.

Authors:  E Schütz; D Svinarov; M Shipkova; P D Niedmann; V W Armstrong; E Wieland; M Oellerich
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay.

Authors:  Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Sebastien Goffinet; Susan O'Morchoe; Thomas Rosiere; Gregory T Maine; Myriam Labalette; Giuseppe Aimo; Diana Dickson; Ed Schmidt; Reinhard Schwinzer; Rainer W Schmid
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.681

View more
  6 in total

1.  Multicenter-Based Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ciclosporin in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients.

Authors:  Ling Xue; Wen-Juan Zhang; Ji-Xin Tian; Lin-Na Liu; Hai-Hong Yan; Wen-Wen Zhang; Xiao-Liang Ding; Jing-Jing Zhang; Li-Yan Miao
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Effect of itraconazole on the concentrations of tacrolimus and cyclosporine in the blood of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Miho Nara; Naoto Takahashi; Masatomo Miura; Takenori Niioka; Hideaki Kagaya; Naohito Fujishima; Hirobumi Saitoh; Yoshihiro Kameoka; Hiroyuki Tagawa; Makoto Hirokawa; Kenichi Sawada
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Comparison of architect I 2000 for determination of cyclosporine with axsym.

Authors:  Nafija Serdarevic; Lejla Zunic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2012-12

4.  Multicenter analytical evaluation of the automated electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for cyclosporine.

Authors:  Michael Vogeser; Maria Shipkova; Raül Rigo-Bonnin; Pierre Wallemacq; Matthias Orth; Monika Widmann; Alain G Verstraete
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Effects of CYP3A5 polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of a once-daily modified-release tacrolimus formulation and acute kidney injury in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Takaya Yamashita; Naohito Fujishima; Masatomo Miura; Takenori Niioka; Maiko Abumiya; Yoshinori Shinohara; Kumi Ubukawa; Miho Nara; Masumi Fujishima; Yoshihiro Kameoka; Hiroyuki Tagawa; Makoto Hirokawa; Naoto Takahashi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Multi-center Performance Evaluations of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassays in the Asia-Pacific Region.

Authors:  Xuzhen Qin; Jianzhong Rui; Yong Xia; Hong Mu; Sang Hoon Song; Raja Elina Raja Aziddin; Gabrielle Miles; Yuli Sun; Sail Chun
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.464

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.