Uma Rao1, Constance L Hammen, Russell E Poland. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9101, USA. uma.rao@utsouthwestern.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study examined whether cortisol measures are associated with the clinical course of depression in adolescents. Furthermore, the study evaluated whether the relationship between cortisol and clinical course is moderated by environmental stress and/or social support. METHOD: Fifty-five adolescents with depression (age range 13-18 years) were recruited. In addition to a systematic diagnostic assessment, information was obtained on environmental stress and social support. Urinary free cortisol measures were collected on three consecutive nights during the index episode. Clinical follow-up evaluations were conducted at regular intervals over a 5-year period, documenting recovery from the index depressive episode and recurrent episodes. Information on environmental stress and social support also was gathered during each follow-up assessment. RESULTS: Consistent with prior reports, the majority of adolescents (92.2%) recovered from the initial depressive episode. A substantial proportion of the recovered youth (42.6%) experienced a subsequent episode during the follow-up period. Higher cortisol levels were associated with a longer time to recovery from the index depressive episode. The effect of cortisol on recovery was moderated by social support. The combination of elevated cortisol and recent stressful experiences predicted recurrence, whereas a higher level of social support was protective against recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: These data, in conjunction with prior literature, suggest that depression reflects an underlying neurobiological vulnerability that may predispose individuals with high vulnerability to chronic, recurrent episodes. Psychosocial factors, independently or in combination with an underlying neurobiological vulnerability, also play an important role in determining the clinical course of depression.
OBJECTIVE: The study examined whether cortisol measures are associated with the clinical course of depression in adolescents. Furthermore, the study evaluated whether the relationship between cortisol and clinical course is moderated by environmental stress and/or social support. METHOD: Fifty-five adolescents with depression (age range 13-18 years) were recruited. In addition to a systematic diagnostic assessment, information was obtained on environmental stress and social support. Urinary free cortisol measures were collected on three consecutive nights during the index episode. Clinical follow-up evaluations were conducted at regular intervals over a 5-year period, documenting recovery from the index depressive episode and recurrent episodes. Information on environmental stress and social support also was gathered during each follow-up assessment. RESULTS: Consistent with prior reports, the majority of adolescents (92.2%) recovered from the initial depressive episode. A substantial proportion of the recovered youth (42.6%) experienced a subsequent episode during the follow-up period. Higher cortisol levels were associated with a longer time to recovery from the index depressive episode. The effect of cortisol on recovery was moderated by social support. The combination of elevated cortisol and recent stressful experiences predicted recurrence, whereas a higher level of social support was protective against recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: These data, in conjunction with prior literature, suggest that depression reflects an underlying neurobiological vulnerability that may predispose individuals with high vulnerability to chronic, recurrent episodes. Psychosocial factors, independently or in combination with an underlying neurobiological vulnerability, also play an important role in determining the clinical course of depression.
Authors: Antoinette L Bouhuys; Elisabeth H Bos; Ewin Geerts; Titus W D P van Os; Johan Ormel Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Rachel Manber; Helena C Kraemer; Bruce A Arnow; Madhukar H Trivedi; A John Rush; Michael E Thase; Barbara O Rothbaum; Daniel N Klein; James H Kocsis; Alan J Gelenberg; Martin E Keller Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2008-06
Authors: Rachel H Jacobs; Jonathan L Orr; Jennifer R Gowins; Erika E Forbes; Scott A Langenecker Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2015-01-24 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Katherine J W Baucom; Sara L Turner; Eunjin L Tracy; Cynthia A Berg; Deborah J Wiebe Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Uma Rao; Li-Ann Chen; Anup S Bidesi; Mujeeb U Shad; M Albert Thomas; Constance L Hammen Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 13.382