BACKGROUND: Smaller hippocampal volume has been reported in some adult and pediatric studies of unipolar major depressive disorder. It is not clear whether the smaller hippocampal volume precedes or is a consequence of the illness. Early-life adversity is associated with both smaller hippocampal volume and increased vulnerability to depressive disorder. Hippocampal changes may mediate the relationship between early-life adversity and depressive illness in a subset of patients. However, there are no reports of longitudinal clinical studies that have examined this issue. METHODS: Thirty adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder, 22 adolescent volunteers with no personal history of a psychiatric illness including depression but who were at high risk for developing depression by virtue of parental depression (high-risk group), and 35 adolescent volunteers with no personal or family history of a psychiatric disorder (control subjects) underwent volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. Information was also gathered on early and recent adverse experiences with standard interviews. The participants were followed for up to 5 years to assess the onset and clinical course of depression. RESULTS: Depressed and high-risk groups had significantly smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than control subjects. Higher levels of early-life adversity were associated with smaller hippocampal volumes. Smaller hippocampal volume partially mediated the effect of early-life adversity on depression during longitudinal follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller hippocampal volume in adolescents at high risk for depression suggests that it may be a vulnerability marker for the illness. Early-life adversity may interact with genetic vulnerability to induce hippocampal changes, potentially increasing the risk for depressive disorder. 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Smaller hippocampal volume has been reported in some adult and pediatric studies of unipolar major depressive disorder. It is not clear whether the smaller hippocampal volume precedes or is a consequence of the illness. Early-life adversity is associated with both smaller hippocampal volume and increased vulnerability to depressive disorder. Hippocampal changes may mediate the relationship between early-life adversity and depressive illness in a subset of patients. However, there are no reports of longitudinal clinical studies that have examined this issue. METHODS: Thirty adolescents with unipolar major depressive disorder, 22 adolescent volunteers with no personal history of a psychiatric illness including depression but who were at high risk for developing depression by virtue of parental depression (high-risk group), and 35 adolescent volunteers with no personal or family history of a psychiatric disorder (control subjects) underwent volumetric magnetic resonance imaging studies. Information was also gathered on early and recent adverse experiences with standard interviews. The participants were followed for up to 5 years to assess the onset and clinical course of depression. RESULTS: Depressed and high-risk groups had significantly smaller left and right hippocampal volumes than control subjects. Higher levels of early-life adversity were associated with smaller hippocampal volumes. Smaller hippocampal volume partially mediated the effect of early-life adversity on depression during longitudinal follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Smaller hippocampal volume in adolescents at high risk for depression suggests that it may be a vulnerability marker for the illness. Early-life adversity may interact with genetic vulnerability to induce hippocampal changes, potentially increasing the risk for depressive disorder. 2010 Society of Biological Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Klaus-Thomas Kronmüller; Johannes Pantel; Sebastian Köhler; Daniela Victor; Frederik Giesel; Vincent A Magnotta; Christoph Mundt; Marco Essig; Johannes Schröder Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Thomas S Frodl; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Ronald Bottlender; Christine Born; Markus Jäger; Isabel Scupin; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Eva M Meisenzahl Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-10
Authors: Erin E Edmiston; Fei Wang; Carolyn M Mazure; Joanne Guiney; Rajita Sinha; Linda C Mayes; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-12
Authors: Brigitte A Apfel; Jessica Ross; Jennifer Hlavin; Dieter J Meyerhoff; Thomas J Metzler; Charles R Marmar; Michael W Weiner; Norbert Schuff; Thomas C Neylan Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2010-11-20 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Elizabeth McCauley; Gretchen Gudmundsen; Kelly Schloredt; Christopher Martell; Isaac Rhew; Samuel Hubley; Sona Dimidjian Journal: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol Date: 2015-01-20
Authors: Daniel S Busso; Katie A McLaughlin; Stephanie Brueck; Matthew Peverill; Andrea L Gold; Margaret A Sheridan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: U Dannlowski; H J Grabe; K Wittfeld; J Klaus; C Konrad; D Grotegerd; R Redlich; T Suslow; N Opel; P Ohrmann; J Bauer; P Zwanzger; I Laeger; C Hohoff; V Arolt; W Heindel; M Deppe; K Domschke; K Hegenscheid; H Völzke; D Stacey; H Meyer Zu Schwabedissen; H Kugel; B T Baune Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Jamie L Hanson; Brendon M Nacewicz; Matthew J Sutterer; Amelia A Cayo; Stacey M Schaefer; Karen D Rudolph; Elizabeth A Shirtcliff; Seth D Pollak; Richard J Davidson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 13.382